153 points

It absolutely blows my mind that a twice impeached insurrectionist single term president is not only running again but allowed to.

What the fuck is wrong with the USA?

permalink
report
reply
84 points

Don’t forget, he is the leading candidate for that party too…

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-46 points

both sides have so much in common that, yes, they are the same. it’s not like the choice is vanilla ice cream or a Michelin 8 course meal. it’s vanilla or chocolate

permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points

(Copied from another post)

The thing is, the 14th Amendment, Section 3 isn’t vague on this point - he IS disqualified:

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.

Look at the wording - it’s clearly intended to be an automatic disqualification. The only way you could possibly arrive at the conclusion that the Office of the President is exempt from this section is by jumping through frankly absurd and facile semantic hoops.

But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

Pointedly, the only way Congress should be involved (per the relevant section) is in rescinding the disqualification.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

The Supreme Court is prepared to jump through those hoops. They’ve practiced long and hard for this opportunity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Clarence Thomas’s Patreon is quite well funded, so it’d be dishonest if he didn’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

(Also copied from another post)

Well, they’re only appointed for life, and they did somewhat recently vastly broaden the scope of the 2nd Amendment, and political violence is on the rise, so I wouldn’t be shocked if one or more people decided enough is enough and conducted a “citizen’s kinetic impeachment”, as it were.

Regardless of how things ultimately turn out, things are definitely 10/10 fucky, and I absolutely hate it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Again it did not pass the 2/3 rule. That is critical to make it lawful. I don’t know why that is so hard to understand.

I get it. Trump is a sedacious bastards. But regardless they have yet to convict him of that in the legal court or within the Senate. Ones of those needs to have happened and it has not.

And by the way it is not uncommon. Was done to Clinton for what amounted to a private matter but again did not pass the Senate and thus it did not effect his access to office. As it shouldn’t have in his case.

permalink
report
parent
reply

It doesn’t require conviction. The amendment is written such that disqualification is automatic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Plus Trump is a rapist.

Traitor rapist is not the horse I would have expected the gop to hitch their cart to.

But here we are

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Christians love him!

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

He’s also allowed to run again despite declaring victory the last time, meaning that he is ineligible to run by his own reasoning.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

We’re available for purchase by the highest bidder!

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Right? I mean if justice can be aborted/ sidetracked by a simple appeal, how effective is it? Surely he was found to be liable by a judge, the ruling should stand during the appeal, not be put on hold.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I honestly do not think he will be allowed to take office. I just think things are moving at. Slow pace to make sure things are done correctly.

Probably in some hopes that he will just stop running on his own or something.

But I doubt that he will ever make his way back into office.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What the fuck is wrong with the USA?

  • The Electoral College (and land based instead of population based representation)
  • The Citizens United decision (unlimited money to campaign)
  • First Past the Post voting (mathematically determined 2 party extremism)

Not necessarily in that order. Fixing any one would put the country many degrees to the left though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Who are these people supporting him, and how can we possibly go on living in the same country with them?

My thoughts exactly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-29 points

He hasn’t been convicted of sedation yet and the impeachments did not pass the Senate for removal. Basically that is like an acquittal.

Agree what is wrong with the US but legally it is still up in the air.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points
*

This take is wildly ahistorical. Confederates were barred from office without being impeached. Impeachment is not mentioned in the 14th amendment at all. In fact, it explicitly mentions a remedy for people who have committed insurrection: the Congress can vote by 2/3 majority to reinstate an insurrectionist’s right to hold public office.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

convicted of sedation

I thought that was Bill Cosby

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Well that too with Trump and Epstein. But I may have meant sedition.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

But it shouldn’t still legally be in the air. He’s already been proven to be a traitor.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

I agree with that. Shouldn’t still be legally up in the air. Proven in public opinion, sure. Legal proven no.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Ah, yes, the well-known legal doctrine of “basically that is like.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Basically that is like an acquittal.

Not really. He has still been impeached, it’s just his own party chose not to remove him from office over the impeachment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yes we knew that. The point is legally he has been acquitted. Fair or not he has not been officially convicted and thus this can not be used to eliminate him from running for office.

I know people here don’t agree with it. I wish he was convicted myself. But it’s is not grey. It is ‘not really’. Your either convicted or acquitted and he was the latter because that is how the constitution works. Now use your vote should it come to that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
68 points

As a non-American, I beg you, get rid of Trump. You’re the most powerful country in the world, your election has so much impact outside your borders, we are looking at it and are expecting…

What happens in November ? We don’t know and it’s kinda scary…

permalink
report
reply
33 points

As an American, we don’t know either and it’s terrifying.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

We’re trying. 60 million of us (about 18%) are mentally defective backward degenerates that hold disproportionate power in our idiotic electoral system. The tyranny of this minority brought you trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Most of us know, and are just as terrified as you are. We’re just gerrymandered out of any ability to actually affect the process rationally.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

No, I’m sticking with most. We’re just gerrymandered enough that the smaller group can exert an outsized influence over the rest of us.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They’re only about a third. That’s not really solace, though. The Nazis only had about 30% support, as did Mussolini. That’s all it takes for fascism to succeed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

As a Canadian, its never been so divided as when the previous president was in power. Are we divided? Yes.

As bad as when Cheeto Dorito was in power? Absolutely not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

We have little say in that. You need to ask pootin.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-48 points

Yeah I’m so excited to vote for genocide joe over the criminally insane orange.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

I’m excited to actually be able to vote in 2028. That’s what I’m voting for.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

These names you keep giving politicians… Why?

Is it hatred against career politicians?
A way for people to remember bad things they’ve done?
Is it mostly tongue in cheek?

Legitimately curious

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Because they aren’t very bright and they need it to be simple. They’ve found a mindless mantra they can recite and, by golly, they’re going to keep saying it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Because the average voter is as mature as the average politician, I guess. ‘Of the people’ and all that jazz.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points

All of the above lol.

Genocide Joe because of his obvious involvement in Gaza and because of his copy paste foreign policy from the Obama administration

Criminally insane orange because he has been criminally charged multiple times, acts insane, and is also orange lol.

It’s just too easy to make fun of them because the two party system heavily restricts your ability to vote for a candidate that you actually want or need.

So every election period always starts off with a candidate who I almost always didn’t want or vote for, and immediately expect nothing from which is usually what happens.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

unfortunatly idiots like that are all over this place and completely remove the ability to have an actual rational discussion without them wedging that one topic into every fucking conversation

permalink
report
parent
reply
62 points

You’re either voting for America or Gilead.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Blessed be the fruit

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Under his orange skin

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

ಠ_ಠ

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

I think that argument might convince people to vote for trump tbh. More and more it looks like the US had way too much power and uses it for evil and maybe voting for the dude that will cause its downfall will be the best thing for the rest of the world

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

As a part of “the rest of the world” I say you clearly : no. I don’t want Trump nor Gilead. I prefer corporate America other that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points
*

Genocide and climate apocalypse, or genocide and climate apocalypse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

This is not ending with a Biden win. If Trump loses there are others waiting to take up the mantle. People that will look better (not physically) on paper so to speak. They will appeal to the more Traditional conservative, the mainstream.

A Trump loss will force MAGA back, after a bit of grumbling and violence, then they will become quiet. Not all of them. But the next fight will be 2026, 2028, 2030, etc. Though my belief thinks a better than Trump candidate will definitely be 2028 the next presidential election.

This Insurrection isn’t over for them…just like the Civil War never ended for them. They have patience.

We must remain vigilant and push for more equality for all.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

The impossible needs to happen. We need constitutional amendments to further define and protect our democracy. But that would require those in power to be willing to close the gaps to limit individuals and party power, and I think very few in state houses (states have to ratify amendments) or Congress want to do that. It’s like the poor man who wants to protect the rich man’s wealth from taxes because someday he will be rich too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

A constitutional amendment will never occur again, because it is an incredibly high bar to overcome even when the legislative process in the country isn’t as dysfunctional.

One party would need a super majority in both houses of Congress, where the bar is 2/3 but you’re probably going to need at least ten more than that to prevent the amendment from being scrapped by a contingent of Joe Liebermans.

Then that same party will need a majority in the state legislatures of 38 states to ratify the amendment.

It’s just not going to happen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Completely agree.

Although if we could get away from the partisan political mess we have now and get back to when members would work together instead of punishing them for crossing the isle there could be a chance. Maybe in 40 or 50 years, but that’s still a chance.

https://www.vox.com/2015/4/23/8485443/polarization-congress-visualization

A house divided and all that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I would say less patience and more persistent.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

You also need to look around you and realize that you have been governed by authoritarian fascists for the past 100 years continuously

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

So then do nothing and not participate right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

That’s your stupid conclusion

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points
*

deleted by creator

permalink
report
reply
2 points

It’s not the scary foreigners. It’s “our” rich people who have bought out the system and molded it to their liking. Capitalism always turns into fascism as the system crumbles under its own weight unless something drastic occurs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Funny story, it’s both

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 10K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 480K

    Comments