Critics say the QAnon conspiracy theorist, in the position less than a year, failed to deliver on funding promises

A group of Michigan Republicans voted on Saturday to remove Kristina Karamo as state party chair after months of infighting and slow fundraising raised concerns her leadership would hurt the party’s chances in the key swing state in 2024.

Karamo, a former community college instructor and election-denying activist who was elevated to her post in February, has indicated she would not respect Saturday’s vote, setting the stage for a potentially messy court battle over party leadership.

At a special meeting called by critics of Karamo, nearly all of the state committee members present voted to remove her from her post, according to Bree Moeggenberg, a state committee member who helped organize the meeting in Commerce Charter Township.

She has failed to deliver on that promise while angering many of her supporters with what they have called a lack of transparency from her administration. Contributions from the party’s largest donors have dried up, leading to a cash crunch.

A report released last month by Warren Carpenter, a former congressional district chair and one-time Karamo supporter, said the state party was mired in debt, on the “brink of bankruptcy” and “essentially non-functional” under her leadership.

It sounds the the same way all of them lead, because leading isn’t what they want to do. They want to rule, NOT lead.

It will be interesting to see if she follows through on her “I’m not going to step aside” talk. Also funny how the one thing they can all rally around is not respecting a vote, unless they win it.

Edit - s/here/her

permalink
report
reply
22 points

I swear, half of these people are grifters, while the other half are true believers who are incompetent or unstable enough to fall for the first half’s cons.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Fe, irony!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

HeH

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

Karamo, an (…) election-denying activist (…) has indicated she would not respect Saturday’s vote

Wow, surprise of the century!

Also, the headline is misleading. They’re fine with her anti-democratic conspiracy theory bullshit, they just think she isn’t good enough at collecting legal (and probably some illegal) bribes for them.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

My guess is that it has to do with her being a woman and not white. You know how republicans are.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah, that’s probably part of it too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Unfortunately the more I learn about these Q types, the more it seems like they want to world to burn to cleanse it to their liking.

Since that can’t really be done legally, with kindness, or humanity, they need a dictator to make these big moves and it seems she’s going to practice this for a bit.

permalink
report
reply
13 points

Virtually every politician or political hopeful that is a forevertrumper is a grifter themselves, they love Trump because he’s been elected as king of the grifters, they look up to him because what bigger con is there than conning your way into the presidency.

The great thing about all of them being grifters is that when tempted with all that money that flows through elections and parties, they can’t but funnel as much as they can from it into their own pockets, it’s pathological.

By electing all these grifters into positions of power, the republican party is ruining its own finances.

This while their actions through the decades has made money a direct equivalent to power.

There may be more billionaires on their side these days, but the type of billionaires that side with them aren’t the type that’ll give their own money to the cause.

Lets hope that them sabotaging themselves so persistently will be enough to offset how effective these grifters are in luring functionally retarded people to vote for them.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

I listened to her in this podcast about the situation:

https://www.thisamericanlife.org/820/believe-in-me

One point she makes is that there is too much focus on money, and that money is not the point of a party.

I wish that were true, but it’s not, at least in the USA.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

I liked when the reporter asked Karamo if she could name just one example of how they’ve been fundraising and she said yes but still failed to do so.

Kristina Karamo

We’re not bankrupt. That’s not true. So the thing about it is, we are operating at a positive cash flow. So yes, it has-- have I hit the financial goals that I would like? Not at the level I would like, but we are on our way.

Zoe Chace

Well, that’s why I guess I’m asking just for any example. Is there a fundraiser in which you tapped into businesses that had been sitting on the sidelines, like you talked about in your campaign?

Kristina Karamo

Of course.

Zoe Chace

Or something like that?

Kristina Karamo

Of course.

Zoe Chace

Just any specific you can give me?

Kristina Karamo

Yeah, well, for one, yes. But I don’t know what specific you’re looking for. Because my question is, why are you so dogmatic on the notion of people who want to push the elitist narrative? That’s my question. Because I’ve answered it multiple times.

But my question to you, so why are you so aggressive on that notion? I’m not going to go through the nuts and bolts of every person who’s given $1 or $10,000 or $20,000 to our administration. I’ve answered, we’re operating at a positive cash flow.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 385K

    Comments