cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/1328094

Texas state Sen. Roland Gutierrez, since news outlets have a phobia of putting the damn name in the title

-5 points

Snowballs chance unfortunately. I understand getting a Democrat to win in Texas is effectively impossible.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

Its not though. We used to be a Democrat bastion pre southern strategy. People need to get back to voting in their own interest and not party lines. I suppose step one is even voting to begin with…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Oh cool, thanks. I have friends in Texas and they make it sound like it could never happen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It is going to be a tough battle and we will have to fight every attempt to stop it. The republicans have built state government in a way to try and make it as difficult as possible for a democrat to take over. But it is never impossible. We also tend to be pessimistic on this topic

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

We used to be a Democrat bastion pre southern strategy

So when the Democrats were the racists?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Not entirely. You should work on your black and white view of the world.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I understand getting a Democrat to win in Texas is effectively impossible.

For statewide offices it’s our low turnout. The populations of the Austin, Dallas, Houston, and San Antonio metros outnumber the rest of the state and generally vote blue. We need to get the non-voters out to the polls to flip the US Senators, Governor, Lt Governor, and Attorney General. Then we.can make headway on gerrymandering.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Honestly between this guy and Allred there is a chance to get rid of Ralphie

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Every election the GOP margin of victory in Texas shrinks. Beto was within 3 points after saying he’d take people’s guns. A strong candidate from the Democrats can absolutely win a statewide election in Texas.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The comment on guns was during his presidential campaign.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
94 points
*

I do not like that man Ted Cruz, I do not like his far-right views. I do not like his stupid chin, I do not like his smarmy grin. I do not like him with a beard, I do not like him freshly sheared. I do not like Ted Cruz at all, that man Ted Cruz can suck my balls.

I do not like that man Ted Cruz, I do not like him in the news. I do not like what he just said, I do not like his boxy head. I do not like him wearing glasses, I do not like him kissing asses. I wish he’d never get one vote, that man Ted Cruz can lick my scrote.

I do not like that man Ted Cruz, I do not like his backward views. I do not like his stupid suits, I do not like his cowboy boots. I do not like him when he sneezes, I do not like him eating cheeses. I hate to see his dumb face smirking, because his beard looks like a merkin’.

I do not like that man Ted Cruz, I do not like his far-right views. I do not like him in these reeds, I do not like him when he feeds. I do not like him by a wall, I do not like this shit at all. I do not like him as Santa’s elf, that man Ted Cruz can fuck himself.

I do not like that Ted Cruz man, I do not like him shouting klan. I do not like him in a room, I do not like him in Cancún. I do not like him playing ball, I do not like his face at all. I wish he’d lose his cushy job, that man Ted Cruz is a fucking knob.

I do not like that man Ted Cruz, I do not like his shitty views. I do not like him saying ass, I do not like him serving sass. I do not like him in a seat, I do not like him holding meat. I do not like him when he’s smooching, I do not like him with Mnuchin. I hate his stupid pronoun bits, that man Ted Cruz is full of shit.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

I tip my hat off to you. that was awesome.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

It was a recurring bit on John Oliver’s show. Should be turned into a book though.

https://youtu.be/bV42PgyOFE0

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/bV42PgyOFE0

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I’m open-source, check me out at GitHub.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I wish I had more upvotes to give. I also tip my hat to you, good sir.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Please don’t pull another “Beto”

permalink
report
reply
16 points

He fucking killed his campaign with one sentence. If he was running in California, he might have been able to survive. I have no doubt that Beto would be a fine governor, but the DNC should have never even considered running him in TX.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Ribbit

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What sentence are you referring to?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

What was wrong with Beto? Am I out of the loop?

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

He’s being very anti-gun in a state where there is a strong gun culture. He could’ve said something like “We need to stop criminals from getting guns”, instead, he said something along the lines of “We’re coming for all your guns!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

People seem to just be assuming the gun control comments were an insurmountable anchor around his neck, but after Uvalde polling put him just down 4 points (43-47) for trust on gun issues. There’s a lot more wiggle room in the gun debate, even in Texas, than people think.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

He would have been a fine governor, but the reason he fucked up was because he told TX citizens that he’d take their guns away. That’s the easiest way to kill a campaign in TX

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Ahh, thank you for the clarity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

“Hell yes we’re going to take your guns” is not the best slogan when running for governor of Texas.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

He is to politics as a glass of milk is to beverages.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Unironically a great analogy because milk rehydrates you much better than water (and chocolate milk is even better) but it’s fucking impossible to drink when you’re really thirsty.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Gutierrez voted to make Texas a sanctuary state for oil and gas companies. Just another “lesser of two evils”.

Source: https://justfacts.votesmart.org/candidate/key-votes/106951/roland-gutierrez

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Unfortunately, many democrats still love thier oil money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Which you can add on to the list of reasons why two party systems are bullshit.

I vote for people and not against people, though. Corrupt politicians are not politicians I want to vote for.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

Someone needs to get rid of That Asshole Ted Cruz. That Asshole Ted Cruz is a real asshole.

permalink
report
reply
29 points

The totally human Ted Cruz?

https://www.tedcruzforhumanpresident.com/

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

https://www.tedcruzforhumanpresident.com/

Well that made my day. Thanks!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m not sure what i just clicked on… mostly because during the last election republican candidates at the state level had legitimate websites that looked… worse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Are you talking about the Ted Cruise that pisses his pants because he likes the warm wet feeling between his legs?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Ribbit

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Nope, that’s what Cruz did. Texans were suffering and he went on vacation after the issue had begun.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Hey let’s not kink shame, he’s an asshole for other reasons

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Yeah like fucking off to Cancun while his constituents froze without power and in many cases, water

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I understood this reference

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 450K

    Comments