US presidents cannot be prosecuted for selling pardons or assassinating political rivals through SEAL Team Six, personal Trump lawyer John Sauer argued Tuesday

Advancing a sweeping interpretation of executive immunity, Donald Trump’s attorney told a federal appeals court on Tuesday that U.S. presidents could not be prosecuted for selling pardons or assassinating political rivals through SEAL Team Six.

Trump’s lead attorney D. John Sauer argued that only a president who has been impeached and removed from office in a Senate trial potentially would be subject to prosecution for those kinds of alleged crimes.

A three-judge panel appeared extremely skeptical of Trump’s vision of absolute immunity, sharply questioning and interrupting Sauer during the opening minutes of the oral arguments with the former president himself sitting nearby.

“Could a president order SEAL Team Six to assassinate a political rival? That’s an official act–an order to Seal Team Six,” U.S. Circuit Judge Florence Pan asked Sauer.

“He would have to be, and would speedily be, you know, impeached and convicted before the criminal prosecution,” Sauer replied, setting a pre-condition for such prosecution in Pan’s hypothetical.

253 points
*

So this means its open Trump hunting season for Biden, right? It is totally legal and cool for him to assassinate Trump, right??


Of course we all know they intend for this argument to only apply to Trump.

permalink
report
reply
64 points

Stuff like this is what I wish would happen.

Like the german nazi party desperately wants more people to be evicted from Germany, I say great, evict the AfD politicians and their voters! Wooot! Everyone happy!

permalink
report
parent
reply
60 points
*

Right, when the right wing fuckos trot out their obviously bad-faith arguments, we should be taking to them to their logical fucking conclusions right the fuck away.

It would be beautiful to see the entire Republican wing of the house pissing themselves and losing their shit knowing that an assassin from Biden could get them at any moment. Especially after the first few drop and Biden just says “it’s me, it’s totally legal and cool, right?” Also making sure to drop the first 20-or-so at the same time so right after it happens the Dems have a majority in both the House and Senate so no Republican can actually bring a vote for impeachment.

They’d be screaming bloody murder because the only thing they actually care about is their own skins.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Nah, let them keep a majority in the house. They vote to impeach, the Senate acquits, then he goes for round two…

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Trump is not a very good walker. Very weak steps. Maybe it will be a sort of accident? Is that the ruzzian way or what?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Very weak steps by the very low window in the very tall building.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Trump has the tallesest buildings. Buildings with windows so tall, the likes of which nobody has ever seen before.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Nah, that’s polonium tea

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I know Elmer always lost, but I still want to see Trump being chased by Biden with a rifle like Elmer Fudd. Real life doesn’t have to imitate the cartoon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-34 points
*

No. If you read the article, you’ll see that this isn’t Sauer’s argument. It’s another ragebait title, and based on the comments in this thread, it’s working.

EDIT: Okay, I see the flaw in my thinking. Carry on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points
*

His argument is that there would be no possible legal recourse if a US president tried to seize absolute power the way Saddam Hussein did in Iraq, by having everyone in the legislature that might oppose him lined up and shot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Okay, I was wrong. I see the problem. Thank you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

Yeah it is. Maybe you’d like to think there’s some subtlety we’re missing because Sauer stated the President would need to be impeached to lose immunity, but what happens if the President assassinates anyone who would impeach him?

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points
*

Oh right on, hey call it off guys and gals. This dude read the article and says democracy is going to be just fine.

Edit: much respect to anyone willing to update their conclusions based on new input.

permalink
report
parent
reply
96 points

Then they’re saying it would be legal if Biden assassinated Trump right now.

permalink
report
reply
53 points

Either his actions were treason and the sentence is death or his actions as president were untouchable in which case the president can shoot him without reprise. What a dangerous precedent to set!

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Sounds like these legal arguments are a win-win for anyone who isn’t Trump then

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Only if the House didn’t impeach him and the Senate didn’t convict.

So Biden would also have to kill as many Congressional Republicans as possible to prevent any impeachment vote from succeeding. This “legal theory” is essentially saying “one murder might be criminally liable, but mass murder of political opponents is just fine!”

permalink
report
parent
reply
95 points
*

Here’s a better question, Judge Pan.

Could a president order Seal Team Six to assassinate unsympathetic judges, either of an appeals court or the Supreme Court itself, since that’s an “official act?” Because that might be something worth considering.

permalink
report
reply
10 points
*

This argument would, in fact, suggest that the president could order a judge assassinated. And I’m guessing the appeals court knows that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Like every other grand ol’ projection, I believe this should be interpreted as a threat of things to come, not academic speculation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
76 points

what the fuck

permalink
report
reply
45 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Yes, and also revealing how fascist the United States has been for centuries.

permalink
report
parent
reply
64 points

Man, why did Nixon even bother resigning? Why was Clinton or Trump even impeached? They were obviously immune from ever doing anything wrong, ever. The Presidency exists completely outside of the normal checks and balances in our government, the President can just do whatever they want.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

Well being President is sort of like being a Star. And as well all know, if you’re a Star they let you do it. Orange Julius was talking about underage pageant contestants at the time, but I think the same principle applies here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The Dic…president I mean is a god. /s

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 21K

    Posts

  • 545K

    Comments