The president’s speech at a South Carolina church did not go over well with the GOP candidate.

Joe Biden gave a speech in South Carolina on Monday, and Nikki Haley isn’t happy about it. Specifically, she’s not happy about the part where the president called her out for her extremely cringeworthy comments about the Civil War, saying, “Let me be clear, for those who don’t seem to know: Slavery was the cause of the Civil War.”

The issue of the Civil War—and her commentary on it—has come up for Haley in the past. While running for governor of South Carolina in 2010, she described the war as a matter of two sides fighting over “tradition” and “change,” adding that the Confederate flag was “not something that is racist.” She also claimed there was no reason to take the flag down from the statehouse grounds (until five years later, after the mass shooting at the Charleston church). After Haley’s gaffe in December, Jaime Harrison, the chair of the Democratic National Committee, said that her failure to mention slavery was “not stunning if you were a Black resident in SC when she was Governor.”

123 points
*

Here’s the thing about the states that seceded - they drafted ordinances of secession with a declaration of causes for secession, and they all say they’re leaving the union because they want to enslave black people.

There is no debate about this. It was written down by the confederates.

Georgia’s first paragraph in their declaration of causes:

The people of Georgia having dissolved their political connection with the Government of the United States of America, present to their confederates and the world the causes which have led to the separation. For the last ten years we have had numerous and serious causes of complaint against our non-slave-holding confederate States with reference to the subject of African slavery. They have endeavored to weaken our security, to disturb our domestic peace and tranquility, and persistently refused to comply with their express constitutional obligations to us in reference to that property

Mississippi, second sentence:

Our position is thoroughly identified with the institution of slavery-- the greatest material interest of the world. Its labor supplies the product which constitutes by far the largest and most important portions of commerce of the earth. These products are peculiar to the climate verging on the tropical regions, and by an imperious law of nature, none but the black race can bear exposure to the tropical sun.

South Carolina, first paragraph:

The people of the State of South Carolina, in Convention assembled, on the 26th day of April, A.D., 1852, declared that the frequent violations of the Constitution of the United States, by the Federal Government, and its encroachments upon the reserved rights of the States, fully justified this State in then withdrawing from the Federal Union; but in deference to the opinions and wishes of the other slaveholding States, she forbore at that time to exercise this right. Since that time, these encroachments have continued to increase, and further forbearance ceases to be a virtue.

Texas, 3rd paragraph in after babbling about dates and tranquility:

She was received as a commonwealth holding, maintaining and protecting the institution known as negro slavery-- the servitude of the African to the white race within her limits-- a relation that had existed from the first settlement of her wilderness by the white race, and which her people intended should exist in all future time. Her institutions and geographical position established the strongest ties between her and other slave-holding States of the confederacy.

Virginia, first paragraph:

the Federal Government, having perverted said powers, not only to the injury of the people of Virginia, but to the oppression of the Southern Slaveholding States.

permalink
report
reply
16 points

Just a note, I think secession instead of succession?

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

secession

Thanks. Dyslexic guy here. So I make stupid typos like this a lot. 😅

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Can I ask where you found this? I want to learn where I can look this up in the future when some doofus claims a different reason for the civil war

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

They’re readily available, if you Google any state followed by letter of secession they will pop right up.

Here’s Georgia, Mississippi, South Carolina’, Virginia, and Texas:

https://www.battlefields.org/learn/primary-sources/declaration-causes-seceding-states#georgia

There isn’t a letter for every state, some didn’t write a letter and just passed a law saying the union is dissolved or something like that.

Here also is the confederate constitution: https://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/csa_csa.asp

I will direct your attention to this line -

(4) No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, or law denying or impairing the right of property in negro slaves shall be passed.

For anyone parroting states rights nonsense. Literally banned the ability of a state to choose on whether or not to allow slavery

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Sweet, thanks for that!

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Not the same person but I googled “causes for secession” and clicked the first link.

First link.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Thanks, I wasn’t sure how to look them up. I’m largely unfamiliar with the topic and didn’t know what a “causes” meant in legalese so it flew over my head. 😅

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeahnobutreallyitzaboutstatesrightsandmuhfreedomandtraditionz!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
permalink
report
parent
reply
114 points

Yes, Nikki, you’re right that it was about “tradition” and “change,” but what you’re conveniently neglecting is the fact that the tradition that these states didn’t want to change was owning slaves.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

She might really enjoy how in Florida they have Prager U make books and videos on how Slavery was beneficial to the slaves for the masses to get their edumications from…

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

She’s pitching to those afflicted with the Southern notion of “liberty” though, which is essentially all of the Republican Party.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Southern liberty isn’t liberty at all, it’s actual chattel slavery.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Not quite. It was more about the north not returning their property, so they threw a tantrum.

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points

Tradition to do WHAT EXACTLY?? TO DO WHAT …???

permalink
report
reply
18 points

Oh, you know… Stuff.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

And things, like whips

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Permanently Deleted

permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points
*

adding that the Confederate flag was “not something that is racist.”

Imagine what might’ve happened if Haley was a university president and had parsed her words like that.

permalink
report
reply
33 points

“The flag can’t be racist, it has black flag friends.” - Haley probably (note she’s used that excuse for herself already)

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

token black flags, that is

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Henry Rollins enters chat…

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

*had

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

As a child. That’s what she said. She had black friends as a child. She’s 51. She turned 18 in 1981. She apparently hasn’t had black friends in 33 years. Not one black friend since 1981 at the very latest.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-50 points

Notice how no one had a problem with the Confederate flag until 2015-16 thereabouts? It was just a symbol meaning “of the South” politicized and demonized unnecessarily…

That said Haley is a god damn moron and a sociopath who can only look otherwise when compared to a bigger monster.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Wait, what? I’m pretty sure a lot of people have had a problem with the Confederate flag since long before 2015. It’s always been “politicized”, its literally a political symbol. And it’s demonized because people don’t like traitors or slavery.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

2015 is probably the year that the poster was allowed to go outside the “for kids” sections of the Internet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Seriously? It was always a symbol for “racist piece of shit”, and most people did have a problem with it but just ignored it, like all the other racist piece of shit symbolism because the Voting Rights act passed and Segregation was defeated so racism ended…right?..right?

Source: not born in the south but lived there, and am old.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yup. It’s like when you see someone wearing Orange Jesus regalia now - it’s always been a signifier to sane people to keep away from them as much as possible. They are surely racist AF, and on top of that, too stupid/crazy to not broadcast it to the world.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Maybe people in the south forgot, but the rest of the world definitely always knew that it’s a symbol for racist historically challenged losers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Notice how no one had a problem with the Confederate flag until 2015-16 thereabouts?

Was 2016 the first time you became politically aware, or are you just speaking in bad faith?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Ding ding.

“A thing didn’t exist before I knew of it.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Yeah no, as someone who was raised in a sane part of the United States, I knew what that flag meant before I even made it to highschool. And we all knew that the scumbags that still displayed the flag were racist pieces of shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Um, nearly everyone had a problem with the flag of the treasonous loser country.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

All those black kids I went to school with back in the 80s were fine and dandy with it. /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

The ones I went to school with in the 2000’s were fine with it, heck many of them actually wore em on t-shirts. Because culturally speaking, it had more to do with BBQ around here than it did with racism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

She very publicly removed it from the state capitol

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

That’s just a lie. I was born in 1977 and I knew that flag was an insult to every black person in America since I learned about the Civil War in elementary school. No one had to teach me that either. It’s fucking obvious.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

The “tradition” of the Confederacy lasted five years.

The Obama administration lasted eight years.

The Obama administration is more a part of their tradition and heritage than the Confederacy.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Also: Obama’s tenure only ended because of term limits. The “tradition and heritage” of the Confederacy ended in defeat at the hand of the United States.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

I’ve been thinking about this recently. Reagan would have had a third term. Clinton would still get elected and likely have a third term as well because the recession that got Bush Sr. would have got Reagan. There’s a good chance we don’t defund counter terror in the FBI and we actually catch the 9/11 terrorists. So Clinton probably stays in office until the 2008 start of the housing crisis. At this point party fatigue usually sets in so Obama would likely lose to McCain. But that’s okay because he was probably the safest GOP choice in the last 50 years. Still GOP policies would have done him in by 2016, at which point Obama v Hillary plays out and we get Obama as our current president. Trump forever remains a footnote as he tried to run against McCain in 2016 and McCain obliterated Trump’s ego in the way only the military can.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Goddamn it I’m already fed up with our reality, I didn’t need to read about an amazing alternative history where Iraq never happened and I probably joined the military to get an education and technical training!

Instead we got Bush, and I could smell the fraudulent stink of Iraq even as a stupid 17 year old…

:P

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 466K

    Comments