Perhaps most salient is the suit filed last month by Stability AI cofounder Cyrus Hodes, who claimed the CEO convinced him to sell his 15 percent stake in the company for $100 after insisting that the company is “essentially worthless”

oof

permalink
report
reply
92 points

Always remember…if someone tells you something is worthless, but they still want it, it ain’t worthless…

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

How bad did he need $100!? That is essentially worthless in the context of any company, even a small business. I would imagine “essentially worthless” in a company is much closer to 100k

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

Yeah that seems really weird. $100 is so little money that you might as well hold onto it even if it were indeed worthless.

That would only make sense if there was something external forcing the sale or some kind of liability that you could escape through selling. And I can’t see either applying here

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Persuasion level 100

permalink
report
parent
reply
65 points

This is the best summary I could come up with:


From fundraising more than $100 million at the end of 2022 to hemorrhaging top talent by mid-2023, Stability AI — the firm that funds and supports development of the open source Stable Diffusion image generator — has had a helluva year.

Though Mostaque insists that “churn” is a common practice in startups while trying to establish “cultural fit” between employee and company, interviews with several former and current people involved with the project say the CEO’s lofty vision often doesn’t match up to the reality of his day-to-day ability as a business leader.

Earlier this summer, Forbes published an exposé that highlighted his “history of exaggeration,” and in its opening lines notes that Mostaque’s claim that he has a master’s degree from Oxford didn’t hold up to scrutiny.

Case in point: in a statement to Futurism, a Stability representative said that because the company “is in the innovation business,” it is “well aware that any time a new path is taken in any field, there will be critics and skeptics.”

“That reality is no different for the field of generative AI, which has taken the world by storm because of its potential to be the greatest disruptor of our time,” the statement continued.

We remain focused on developing the best open language and image models for millions of users worldwide, and our work is just beginning."


I’m a bot and I’m open source!

permalink
report
reply
17 points

Good bot

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

Unstable Diffusion

permalink
report
reply

That’s a porn subreddit

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Unstable Diffusion describes an experimental version of SD

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That was my first terminal-based usage of SD before I found Automatic1111, but admittedly they picked an unfortunate name as I’m pretty sure the name was already in use by an NSFW AI-gen art community.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I get it but there’s literally a porn subreddit

https://old.reddit.com/r/unstable_diffusion/

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Emad is a lot like how I imagine Elon without the money.

The more I read, the more it seems Runway, not Stability, deserved to release what would eventually become Stable Diffusion.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

All you need to know about him is he spends all his waking hours approaching different publications and asking them to interview him for his thoughts on AI. He is from the new batch of muskulencers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Techbros gonna techbro. This barely counts as gossip. I wish them all a very accidentally trip in to the torment nexus where they suffer for a simulated eternity or something.

permalink
report
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.ml

Create post

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

Community stats

  • 3.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.6K

    Posts

  • 41K

    Comments

Community moderators