Sanctions were applied after the social media platform delayed compliance with a federal search warrant that required Twitter to hand over Donald Trump’s Twitter data without telling the former president about the warrant for 180 days.

1 point

I feel like it should be noted that Twitter didn’t have any objections at all to handing over all of Trump’s data. Thier only issue was with not telling him about it.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

If you read the article that was one of several things they threw out there to excuse their consistently delaying/not complying. The courts told them repeatedly that their opinions on the matter were wrong and they kept delaying over and over again.

I mean come on:

“Twitter contends that it ‘substantially complied with the [w]arrant’ because ‘there was nothing [it] could have done to comply faster’ after the court issued the February 7 order,” the court document said.
The court rejected Twitter’s “good faith” arguments, mainly because the company blew past the original deadline and repeatedly failed to raise concerns at earlier opportunities.

Twitter continued challenging the nondisclosure order and the sanctions, but the court rejected most of its arguments and ultimately affirmed the contempt sanctions, issuing its opinion on July 18.

This nonsense went on for months.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

To avoid a fine, all they had to do was tell the court they needed more time before the deadline*

*Because Space Karen fired all the people who knew how to look this up

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Space Karen lmfao

permalink
report
parent
reply
89 points

That’s like fining you or I a penny. It’s so ridiculously inconsequential to Musk.

permalink
report
reply
0 points

This the top comment on literally every news article about a fine, lol.

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points
*

If he’d held out one more day it would have been 700k. 2 more days, 1.4M. 3 more, 2.8M.

i.e. Musk caved before it became consequential.

1.4B if he’d waited 2 weeks more. 23.4T (that’s Trillion) if he wanted to shield Trump for a month. I’d say it was a heavy fine that worked as intended.

Someone check my math.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

I checked your math. It’s pretty terrible, my friend.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

Ok. And…

Correct it or stfu.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Inconsequential for Musk sure, but not Twitter. Twitter is a company that didn’t make money, lost half of its ad revenue, can’t afford to pay its rent, can’t afford to pay its cloud providers, and was saddled with huge debts that have $1b in interest annually. The clock is ticking for Twitter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Lol true.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I think the issue is it can become failure of compliance and obstruction of justice at some point or can be tried as that. Elon could really get himself fucked if am investigation found members of the company discussion rejection to oblige.

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

Until fines become wealth based, it will always be a poor people tax.

If cash flow is the issue, then start taking stocks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Or make them recurring fines that grow exponentially each time they are issued until the situation is fixed.

Edit: nvm it sounds like this is exactly what they are doing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Not just a “poor person tax” but it means that the law just doesn’t apply in any meaningful way to the wealthy

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
13 points

The fine was $50K per day, and by the time they complied it had gotten to $350K. They then went to court to fight the fine, and have not definitively lost.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

It wasn’t meant to punish. It was meant to compel, and it worked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Justice system finally getting around to expressing what we’re all feeling for TwitX.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Comply, Elmo, means comply. Like, right now. There isn’t a separate meaning for the very rich.

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 385K

    Comments