Maybe its just me buying “old” technology like the 24-core threadripper but how are y’alls putting more than 128GB in your mobos?

permalink
report
reply
4 points

At home 32 to 64GiB is plenty. For the data center I generally order 384GiB now. It varies depending on use case.

permalink
report
parent
reply

So what I am hearing is that I need to start buying server and not desktop motherboards.

128GB isn’t that much when running multiple VMs with PCIe passthrough and docker apps in the background, but its all my little asus x399 board can handle… or any x399 board it seems.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I rarely run more than one VM at home at a time. Hosting multiple VMs what the big iron is for.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Dumb question. Why should someone ever buy a HDD nowadays?

permalink
report
reply
3 points

HDD is still the superior way to store data compared to ssd’s. Ssd’s are great for accessing your data fast but for people who have a lot of data they don’t access regularly the reliability and price of an HDD is unbeatable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

16TB 7200 RPM the same price as a 2TB NVME.

Do you want 2TB super fast or 16TB that still can transfer at decent speeds?

The answer is yes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

This will blow your mind, but datacenters still buy tapes. It’s just stupid cheap. In the future, chemical storage by DNA or something similar might play the same role for cold storage.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

I don’t get why we research DNA as storage.

It is sensible as fuck, deteriorates quickly, is slow to write and read…

Only advantage it’s bio-compatibility

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

The information density is insane, both volumetric and by mass.

I sort of agree, though. With current methods it seems like it would probably be just as easy to record information in a synthetic polymer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Enterprise 5400 RPM drives for NAS are cheap/quiet/reliable

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Because I can’t afford 120TB in SSDs…

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

They’re great for a NAS, where the priority is high capacity and low cost, over high performance and high cost of SSDs for comparable capacity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

@Chev @produnis

As the other guy said, because they are way cheaper. I use them for media storage.

For 20tb of hard drive storage, you could expect to spend ~$400 (probably less these days), but the same price will get you a 5th that on ssds (maybe more these days)

If you are streaming video, hard drive read speeds are good enough.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Because of economy

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Still cheaper, i use them for large volumes of data that isn’t read or written that often

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

This made me chuckle aloud.

permalink
report
reply
31 points

Builds a high end gaming pc. Nice nice. Can’t wait to try out those new games everyone’s talking about. “Plays classic wow”

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Laughs in openxcom after buying a gaming laptop

permalink
report
parent
reply

Only time I ever ran TinyCore was on my 486 DX2/66

permalink
report
reply

Programmer Humor

!programmerhumor@lemmy.ml

Create post

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

  • Posts must be relevant to programming, programmers, or computer science.
  • No NSFW content.
  • Jokes must be in good taste. No hate speech, bigotry, etc.

Community stats

  • 5.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.5K

    Posts

  • 33K

    Comments