31 points

New trolley problem:

You are a worker at wef, you have access to anarchist cookbook

Do you [redacted] [redacted] [redacted] or [redacted] [redacted] [redacted]

permalink
report
reply

Some time ago I heard that the anarchist cookbook is not recommended and one should use CIA instructions to manufacture improvised explosives etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

To quote Crimethinc, the anarchist cookbook is “not composed or released by anarchists, not derived from anarchist practice, not intended to promote freedom and autonomy or challenge repressive power – and was barely a cookbook, as most of the recipes in it are notoriously unreliable”

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

The anarchist cookbook contains a recipe for “bannanadine” a fictional drug derived from banana peels which as far as I know only exists as a prank for extremely gullible highschool students. This can give you some insight into the quality of recipes included

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I don’t know a whole lot about moral philosophy, but isn’t the only moral thing to do here not to pull the lever? From a Kantian perspective, pulling the lever can only be ethical if everyone pulling the lever would also be ethical, but that leads to the worst outcome. From a utilitarian perspective, the lives of your loved ones are no more valuable the the strangers’ in the middle, so you would maximize utility by preventint the most deaths. From a cynical perspective, self interested rational actors are likely to decide to pull the lever, so you’d stand to lose more from pulling the lever and most certainly achieving the worst case scenario, than you’d gain from the off chance that the other party made the same calculation and decided against taking the risk. From a natural law perspective either choice can be acceptable so long as the intention behind the action is not to kill any person, and the deaths fall into double effect. So maybe there you could justify pulling the lever.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

I dunno, I kinda agree with this person

Philosophy should be banned.

permalink
report
parent
reply

They’re just workshopping ideas for the next Saw movie.

permalink
report
reply
11 points
*

I wish I could dig up the video snippet where “amoral” philosopher Hans-Georg Moeller destroys the trolley problem: https://www.youtube.com/@carefreewandering/videos

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Hopefully you can. Thinking about it now, it reminds me of one of those topics that every redditor™ who thought they were a genius talked to death 10 years ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I know it’s buried in one of his videos, but haven’t found it. The gist is that trolley problems are perfectly spherical frictionless cows in a vacuum. They are metaphysical, platonic ideals of dilemmas that never actually occur in the real world. They’re divorced from the uncountably large number of specifics of any real-life situation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Oh wait they did this in The Dark Knight.

permalink
report
reply

memes

!memes@hexbear.net

Create post

dank memes

Rules:

  1. All posts must be memes and follow a general meme setup.

  2. No unedited webcomics.

  3. Someone saying something funny or cringe on twitter/tumblr/reddit/etc. is not a meme. Post that stuff in /c/slop

  4. Va*sh posting is haram and will be removed.

  5. Follow the code of conduct.

  6. Tag OC at the end of your title and we’ll probably pin it for a while if we see it.

  7. Recent reposts might be removed.

  8. Tagging OC with the hexbear watermark is praxis.

  9. No anti-natalism memes. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Community stats

  • 2K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.8K

    Posts

  • 33K

    Comments