The pledge includes a clause saying that the candidate will support the eventual GOP nominee.

157 points

I will never, ever understand how the entire Republican party lined up behind this guy.

Before Trump was elected, they were all vocal about how unfit he was. Too stupid. Too rude.

Then he got the nomination, and they all bent the knee, and became so loyal to him that they protected him from facing the consequences of his insurrection, even when he put their lives in danger.

permalink
report
reply
60 points

They hate libs so much they will fall in line behind anyone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points
*

Well, he became the guy who would sign their shitty legislation, appoint right-wing judges and other officials to long-term positions, undermine regulators, spread fascist propaganda amplified by the power of the presidency, etc. The person with the R next to their name opens the doors for the flood of partisan garbage and shuts down those pesky people who want things like “democracy” and “tap water that doesn’t poison my family.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

The people who were criticizing Trump in the beginning were the ones with brains, that had gotten to the top to exploit power. They’re smart enough to know not to fight against the mob that is their support base. But also stupid enough to bring in someone that can rile up the mob better than they could.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Power. Plain and simple.

He did exactly what republicans wanted to do just he kept saying the quiet part loud. Now they are stuck. He is a result of decades of right wing talk radio and tv telling people everyone who disagrees is a satan worshipping pedophile. I fear he wont be the worst though

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Same reason the anti-war democrats fell completely silent when Obama got elected, doubled the drone strikes, renewed the Patriot act, and attacked 2 more countries. Party matters a lot more than policy in this country.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Hilarious what that commitment to towing the party line got them

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

💀

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The funny thing is that I think BEFORE Trump, Democrats might have been to some degree susceptible to the same sort of willful blindness to an awful human being who nonetheless supported our policy agenda.

But now, having watched, with disgust, the moral corruption in the Republican party, Democrats are now hypersensitive to it. We have all become more self critical, and more righteous because we’ve seen what a slippery slope it is that the Republicans fell down.

By contrast, Republicans have so much (mostly figurative) blood on their hands that they can’t admit they were wrong about Trump. They can’t admit it to us, and they certainly can’t admit it to themselves. If they were to acknowledge the glaringly obvious facts about Trump’s criminality regarding the attempt to overthrow the election or his theft, mishandling, and cover-up of classified documents, that would mean admitting that Democrats were right about Trump all along.

It’s clear that Republicans would rather lobotomize themselves with Fox News than ever, ever, ever, admit to themselves that they’ve been the bad guys for years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

My theory is that he dug up tons of leverage for each and every one of them. He talks like a mobster, deals like a mobster, decides like a mobster, he certainly keeps his posse in line like a mobster.

permalink
report
parent
reply
106 points

This is great news IMO

He’ll run on his own Freedom Party ticket and we’ll get a 3-party election. Oh no, now the rightwing votes are split. Bummer!

permalink
report
reply
51 points

Much more likely at this point that he just wins the nomination. There is still time for that to change, but nothing that indicates that it will.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

The GOP is in a terrible state

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

We all know they’re in Mississippi, but there are chapters in some good states, too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The US is in a terrible state. Mostly because of the GOP.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Right, there’s really no reason for Trump to participate in the debates anyway - he’s way far out in front, so it would only hurt him. Hell, this might even be an excuse to skip them without looking like he’s afraid to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Trump doesn’t believe he will win the nomination. If he believed he would win, there would be no problem with him signing the pledge. He believes the eventual nominee will be one of 3 or 4 people he despises and cannot support.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

He’ll run on his own Freedom Party ticket and we’ll get a 3-party election. Oh no, now the rightwing votes are split. Bummer!

Republicans are too spineless. Realistically trump will threaten to run third party, and they will forgo the primaries and hand him the nomination.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Isn’t that a little unconstitutional? I know that hasn’t stopped them in the past, but just straight up cancelling a vote of the people is more blatantly fascist than I’d expect from even them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

The political parties are private organizations. They can do whatever they want with their nomination process.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Primaries aren’t in the constitution

permalink
report
parent
reply
90 points

Then don’t let him debate. Why is this hard?

permalink
report
reply
44 points

Don’t even let him run. Like grow a fucking backbone, ya ignoramuses.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

No one will tune in to the debates if Trump isn’t there and everyone knows it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The networks that broadcast the debates want drama because they want views. Trump speaking is one of the biggest draws they can get. I mean he’s a bumbling idiot but everyone, left and right, is gonna want to know what he says.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Because he is their most popular candidate and like we’ve seen from the failures of his copy cats he’s only one with a hold on the alt right voter base

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Most of the GOP voters aren’t loyal to the GOP, they love the particular candidate. George HW Bush gave them wars up the kazoo and couldn’t hold on to them. They’ll write his name in on any ballot, primary or the main event.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

He doesn’t WANT to debate, why does nobody see this lol. We will never see him debate again

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Republicans don’t watch the debates, and literally cheered their candidates for ducking debates with democrats last election.

If they did watch debates, they would realize their candidates had zero platform worth voting for. The ones that do watch them are there for the drama, which this move also satisfies.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Ehh. Trump did terrible in the 2020 debates(although Pence did okay)- but the CNN townhall reflected well on him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
75 points

Trump is loyal to no one but himself. Even if he did sign it he would never honor it.

permalink
report
reply
33 points

Honestly they should all refuse to sign it because the bastards should not agree to support the traitor Trump if he wins the nomination.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Trump believes he is going to lose the nomination. If he thought he was going to be the nominee, there wouldn’t be a problem signing the loyalty pledge. He believes the 3 or 4 other candidates he despises have a better chance at winning the nomination than he does.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

My point is none of the other candidates should have agreed to sign it. It confirms they’ll support someone who tried to overthrow the government before they’ll vote Democrat.

And I’m not sure you’re right re: Trump’s motives. He wouldn’t agree to support the other candidates in 2016 either, and this time around I wouldn’t be surprised if he ran independent if he doesn’t get the nomination.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Yup! 100%

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That’s what I don’t understand. Why doesn’t he sign it knowing full well he can just ignore that pledge once it becomes convenient to do so. Figured he would have learned that by now from his marriages.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

I mean Trump is a pathological liar but he’s also got an ego the size of Texas. Signing the pledge would be, if only symbolically, ceding his free agency. He’d probably say something like:

What’s there to sign? I am the nominee. The rest of these knuckle heads just have a hard time admitting it. And frankly speaking I am the GOP when you think about it. The fact the RNC is too scared to put their money on me from the get go is a sign of weakness and this is why we’re having a hard time winning elections.

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points

Wow, so the shit show begins even before we had even one gop debate. Article states you can’t participate if you don’t sign the pledge to support the eventual nominee.

This is going to be really interesting…

permalink
report
reply
44 points

Cue rally where he claims “they unfairly banned me from participating”

permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

Lol yeah right. He’ll be there anyway and won’t have signed it

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

And call the others weak for signing it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Where does this leave somebody like Chris Christie, who wants to debate, but has also been fervently outspoken against Trump. There’s no way he would support Trump should he become the nominee. Perhaps he has to just fade away at that point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

They were all against him in 2016 too. Until they weren’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

That photo of Ted Cruz phonebanking for Trump after Trump straight up insulted Cruz’s wife? That one photo was all I needed to know about the direction things were headed in for the Republicans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Leaves him taking a long walk off a short bridge

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Thats the goal, be interesting.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 450K

    Comments