63 points

When you see ai-related stories just remember: we’re currently living through what, in another 10 or 20 years, will be remembered as the takeoff of AI. Wherever it goes, either heavily regulated or widespread, AI is only going to get exponentially better and it won’t just be artists crowing about losing their jobs to it.

permalink
report
reply
49 points

More reason to focus on changing to a society that doesn’t work for the sake of working instead of fighting AI.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Except, those are in charge of the AI, just want mass unenployment, to lose our bargaining power, and to work 3 jobs just to eat.

Even the supposed “adapting to AI” for artists is just “buy our stocks and trade them”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Damn, sounds like instead of bitching about AI we should be chopping some heads.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

It will start to get wild when it’s attorneys, paralegals, accountants, actuaries, software developers, designers, journalists, engineers, medical technicians… what’s left after that? Physical labor, skilled mechanical labor, politics and religion?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

automating politics shouldn’t be that hard. also Religion controlled by ai has huge potential. so physical labor it is for us meatbags

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Machine vision and robotics are advancing quickly too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

People would go for it online, but in person, you still need a convincing public speaker. AI could write all their speeches though (and I’m people are on that!)

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

Not necessarily. Generative AI hasn’t been advancing as much as people claim, and we are getting into the “diminishing returns” phase of AI advancement. If not, we need to switch gears in our anti-AI activism

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yep. IMO it’ll be kinda like VR. AI will sort of plateau for awhile until they find a new approach and then the hype will kick up again. But the current approach won’t scale into true AI. It’s just fundamentally flawed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

hmm idk… the only real reason vr has playeued so hard is because of the high barrier to entry. the tech is fine, but there’s not that many good games because it’s expensive and not many own it.

I’d argue that ai will continue to see raid growth for a little while. the core technology behind LLMs may be plateauing, but the tech is just now getting out in the world. people will continue to find new and creative ways to extend its usefulness and optimize what it’s currently capable of.

basically, back to the vr example. people are gonna start making “games” for it. did one’s free, and everyone is hungry for it. I’m putting my money on human creativity for now…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s all about the models and training, though. People thinking ChatGPT 3.5/4 can write their legal papers get tripped up because it confabulates (‘hallucinates’) when it isn’t thoroughly trained on a subject. If you fed every legal case for the past 150 years into a model, it would be very effective.

permalink
report
parent
reply

We don’t know it would be effective.

It would write legalese well, it would recall important cases too, but we don’t know that more data equates to being good at the task.

As an example ChatGPT 4 can’t alphabetize an arbitrary string of text.

Alphabetize the word antidisestablishmentarianism

The word “antidisestablishmentarianism” alphabetized is: “aaaaabdeehiiilmnnsstt”

It doesn’t understand the task. It mathematically cannot do this task. No amount of training can allow it to perform this task with the current LLM infrastructure.

We can’t assume it has real intelligence, we can’t assume that all tasks can be performed or internally represented, and we can’t assume that more data equals clearly better results.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I agree, AI is just a tool like any other. People freaked out the same way when electricity was supplied to cities for the first time, or when computers started becoming popular. I honestly expected better from a more tech oriented social media platform.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Did the calculator replace mathematicians?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

No, but computers did replace computers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

i just hope regular people can use decent quality ai freely in future. its great equalizer since as long as someone in the world has been able to do something you can kind of do it too with ai.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

It’s already happening that average people can use systems that are crippled and constrained, and government agencies or corporations are able to access models that don’t tell you “I’m sorry Dave, I’m afraid I can’t do that”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

What are you talking about? I used gpt4 to help with my custom guitar build, and it was insanely useful. We talked for hours and the AI came up with a custom schematic and wiring diagram for a ts808 boost built into the guitar.

People sleeping on AI or not knowing how it works just baffles me.

It was even analyzing audio clips of the guitar to make suggestions on the design, and showed me the cheapest places to get all the components, chips etc.

Not to mention it can analyze pictures and video, which I also used during my build. I would rather have gpt4 than a human helper.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

This reminds me I’m kinda surprised EA hasn’t released a Jennifer Hale voicebot by now, marketing it as “your own personal Cmdr Shepard assistant”.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

I’m Commander Shepard, and this is my favourite comment on Lemmy

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Again, using audio AI to copy a real voice is kinda dumb. Like using image AI to draw real actors, playing characters… instead of just drawing the fucking character.

This tech would let one actor do all the characters. Like how audiobooks work - except you’d get the actor’s performance in the character’s voice. Stephen Fry doing Snape (behave) may sound like Alan Rickman, but only if Alan Rickman is how Snape’s supposed to sound.

The only reason for him to sound exactly like that is if that’s what people already think he sounds like. New characters, or newly-adapted characters, can sound however you want. This technology will let anybody play them.

So hire someone good.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

I could really use that for dungeon mastering; NPC voices (esp. accents) are the hardest part for me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You don’t have to be the world’s most accomplished voice actor with 500 unique voices in your repertoire to be a good DM. Even if you just have a default “NPC” voice that’s different than your DM-ing voice, most players are fine with that. No need to bring in bullshit AI into the game. DnD players got along fine for decades without it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m saying that it would be nice to enhance my voices, not that I need 500 voices to be a good DM, or that we can’t get by without it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Just because people did fine in the past doesn’t mean we can’t try new things to improve the experience for our players.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

But robot no need production insurance or paycheck!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

If capital can make art without spending money, so can artists.

So they won’t need capital.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-46 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
18 points
*

How does that make sense? You’re losing your job… so relax? This is why they have a union.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-24 points

If they were good at their job, they wouldn’t lose it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

Oh yeah that totally explains why they should relax.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Definitely 100% not worried about being replaced 👌👍.

permalink
report
reply

Games

!games@sh.itjust.works

Create post

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc…
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc…)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

Community stats

  • 6.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 73K

    Comments

Community moderators