83 points

Amazing. Let’s truly take it from their point of view.

The only people who care about this plugin are HomeAssistant users, so a very small subset. Those users then either

A) Already own the product, and thus are not going to cost them anything because they already bought it or B) Home Assistant users who are in the market for their product, and from experience will only buy a product if there’s an HA plugin.

In what way are they losing “millions” to these 2 groups again?

I have literally made decisions on purchases like vehicles on if they have a home assistant plugin or not. For HomeAssitant users it’s one of the largest factors.

permalink
report
reply
55 points

Those users don’t send usage data back to Haier that they can then sell to other companies

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Yes, but without the plug in, they wouldn’t buy the product to give the data. It’s circulat logic on their part.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

I bet they’re using data sales to subsidize the cost of the devices.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It depends. My HVAC controller is a similar story to this one, and a dev has put together a plugin for HA that achieves the same thing. But it makes the exact same calls to the cloud service the OEM uses, so I’m certain they’re getting the same usage data from me, regardless of the software means I use to make those calls.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’m in nearly B as I usually only buy things with proper protocols, e.g Zigbee, that might not need a dedicated plugin. So obviously Haier is now a company I won’t buy anything from and will actively not recommend to anything who cares about my opinion on IoT.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It is insanely petty. Perhaps they don’t want people reverse engineering their APIs, but all their competitors and threat actors likely do it, just not on a public repo.

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points
*

Oh no. At least there’s no way for everyone in the world to make a backup before it goes dark…

permalink
report
reply
24 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Right… they claim hosting it is a violation of their TOS, but I’m not one of their customers. How can I violate their TOS if I don’t even use their product.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

It would be a shame if 697 people and counting were to fork the project, it would be a real pain to serve each one of them with takedown notices.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points
*

TIL General Electric Appliances, Hoover, Fisher & Paykel, Aqua, Hotpoint, Leader, and Candy are all owned by the same company.

permalink
report
reply
27 points

Sad, isn’t it? For fun, look up Whirlpool, Albertsons, and Kroger on Wikipedia to see all the brands they own. No wonder prices are high when so much competition has been eliminated.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

For the Europeans, look up AEG, Bauknecht, Electrolux, Liebherr…sad story as well. And one hell of a case for rampant capitalism running amok…

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

BuT ThE FrEe mArKeT!!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Please yell me bosch and Siemens are seperate companies…

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Quick nofe: Albertsons and Kroger want to be one company. Soon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Noted, thanks

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Special shout-out to LiftMaster/Chamberlain who did the same rug-pull on their customers last year.

Never trust free cloud services attached to a paid product.

permalink
report
reply
28 points

I was happy to see earlier, the developer commented the following:

Luckily I’m insured. I’ve contacted my legal expenses insurance and they’re covering a lawyer for the case. I will seek advice and see how an expert assesses the situation and then proceed.

Tldr, They are going to fight this!

Source: https://github.com/Andre0512/hon/issues/147#issuecomment-1892738060

permalink
report
reply
21 points

Their follow-up:

I have written to Haier to try to get some clarification and perhaps an agreement. I hope Haier will listen to us now that so many people are supporting us. Thank you all!

Dear Haier team,

you have probably noticed that my announcement to delete the plugin has met with a lot of displeasure from the community. There are a number of people who bought your appliances not only because of the good price/performance ratio, but also because they can be integrated into home assistant.

I think it would be helpful to the discussion if you could explain the following questions:

   Please provide details of WHICH clauses of terms of service does this project violate?
   What is an unauthorized manner?  
   What significant economic harm is being faced by the company? (in terms of dollar figures)
   When did these projects violate your intellectual property?

I’m sorry if some people have gone over the top, but this doesn’t have to escalate and there doesn’t have to be a bad reputation for your brand in the open source community.

Can we find a common solution here? Can I do something to make the plugins use the API more economically? Should we reduce the polling? I would like to release a new version that uses the API in a way that does not harm your business. You can also consider an official home assistant integration, the home assistant guys would like to get in touch with you for that. This would be a great competitive advantage within the smart home community.

I hope to get an answer and until then I’ll leave the repos online.

Andre

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Dude has a good heart, that’s for sure. I hope Haier sees the light.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I love his reply, but i’m afraid history so far has shown that supporting open platforms is not a competitive advantage. The number of hackers like us in the smart home market is negligable. Proper closed platforms rake in the big money, and the public loves it… Add on some cloud integration & a subscription to functionalities that would take a home assistant user not much time to set up, and you’ve got something the average customer seems to want…

Still a shit (and probably without any real legal basis) attempt by Haier, but if they’re actually aiming at a walled smart home system, from an economical perspective they’re probably right… And i hate that they’re right…

permalink
report
parent
reply

homeassistant

!homeassistant@lemmy.world

Create post

Home Assistant is open source home automation that puts local control and privacy first. Powered by a worldwide community of tinkerers and DIY enthusiasts. Perfect to run on a Raspberry Pi or a local server. Available for free at home-assistant.io

Community stats

  • 1.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 592

    Posts

  • 6.4K

    Comments