“I’m just ashamed that this bill even came into fruition,” a Lexington council member said.

21 points

This law works both ways, right?

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Once passed they will realise it’s too vague, how can you tell if someone is homeless? It will be a lot easier when they pass the amendment which allows for killing people to are of the darker or more uppity variety. /S

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

At the time the person entered my property they were not in a home. So I identified them as homeless and killed them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

The bill also gives people the ability to justify use of “defensive force” upon an unhoused person in instances of criminal trespass, including “unlawful camping” on the owner’s property. This would allow property owners to use deadly force against unhoused people on their property without facing criminal consequences.

I hope this bill has some “defensive force” applied to it before it becomes a law.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

That’s what those ‘defence rifles’ are used for. Got it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I hope the people who vote for this end up homeless, so they can experience “defensive force” personally.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They won’t

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Imagine if this passed.

If you kick your SO out of your house, and they agree to leave, they’re now instantly unhoused, right? And your honor, they brought all their stuff and were sleeping on my property.

Could landlords come in, swat style, and execute you the moment eviction procedures go through?

If someone is not inside a house, are they not unhoused? If their house burned down 5 minutes ago they certainly no longer have a house. If anyone is not in sight of their house, they could plausibly be unhoused, whether they know it or not. Besides, there’s no way for you to know their housing status. So all campers on your property sound like fair game.

What constitutes camping? Being inside a tent? Sleeping? Bringing stuff onto the property? If a company sets up a party tent at the wrong address, could you mow them down?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They did define it in the law.

But I don’t expect anyone who’d shoot a person for being homeless to read it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

Why did this distinction was made in the first place? Do cops in Kentucky have a habit of gunning down homeless people?

permalink
report
reply
22 points

No, it’s so ordinary people like you and me can do it. Guess they were jealous the police were having all the fun.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Cops have always had a habit of killing the homeless. Also they have a habit of killing the homed. Thanks to qualified immunity in the USA, a cop just has to feel threatened, not actually be threatened, to justify the use of deadly force.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The worst part is that in the rare cases that the cops might possibly be held accountable beyond qualified immunity, juries also like to give them a pass because they l can relate more to a sad cop’s excuse of being afraid more than some corpse that can’t speak for themselves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

And in the very rare case it looks like the police officers will actually face accountability, SCOTUS is there to say it can’t pass Qualified Immunity because the police officers laughed while they did it instead of chuckled.

permalink
report
parent
reply
160 points

The bill also gives people the ability to justify use of “defensive force” upon an unhoused person in instances of criminal trespass, including “unlawful camping” on the owner’s property. This would allow property owners to use deadly force against unhoused people on their property without facing criminal consequences.

Sounds like Kyle Rittenhouse is gonna get his mom to drive him to Kentucky. Seriously though, this is fucking disgusting legislation. Homeless people are dehumanized enough but Kentucky is on the verge of legalizing hunting them for sport. What vile pieces of shit those 45 Republican co-sponsors are.

permalink
report
reply
57 points

So they can kill squatters? Next step, people who are late on rent?

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Sure! Then they can have an estate sale so they can recoup their “losses!”

/s because I’m pretty sure it’s needed, sadly

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You put an S but I would not be surprised in the least.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

What the smart psychopaths will do is march up to them with a gun and provoke the squatter to try to block it. Now they “fear for their life” and steadily force is justified. Pull a Rittenhouse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

This is supposed to be absurd commentary but…it doesn’t even feel too far off

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 18K

    Posts

  • 467K

    Comments