83 points

Good

permalink
report
reply
71 points

I’m proud to say I am 3 months smoke free, after 15 years smoking without a break!

permalink
report
reply
19 points

There ya go, keep it up! And if no one has said it, I am proud of you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I can confirm, no one has said you are proud of them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I quit in September! Congrats! Quitting smoking was way harder than quitting drinking for me, and I was a daily drunk functional alcoholic for years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Wow, qutting drinking and smoking, you must be a strong character. I don’t know you but I’m pretty proud of you. Wish you the best!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Thanks, it was tough, but very worthwhile. Hope the best for you also!

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

We’re counting on you now

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Well done pal! Keep the good work

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Good job to all the people quitting!

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points
*

Think of all that tobacco farmland that could be converted to food crops

permalink
report
reply
61 points

You want to convert something to useful land? Get rid of golf courses.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Por que no los dos?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

And livestock

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Livestock is more useful than tobacco and golf courses

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

We have way more than enough livestock. Humans should be eating less meat.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-4 points

Livestock is one of the reasons we can feed everyone…

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

And cemeteries

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

And enough pavement that anyone can store their cars close to pretty much any destination they have in mind.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Do we actually need more food crops though?

I thought we already produced enough food to feed the whole planet. Distribution is the real problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Smaller more diverse farms would help, but the grocery stores would have to learn how seasonal, regional crops work. Instead of offering pineapples, kiwis, and strawberries 365 days a year.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Instead of offering pineapples, kiwis, and strawberries 365 days a year.

Why can’t they? At least in North America refrigerated railcars make year round fresh fruit an option. Plus frozen fruit is an option anywhere

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I vote just keeping the fields dormant so we can actually do crop rotation and stave off massive crop failures.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Personally I’d like to see the fields replaced with the forests that were cut down for them in the first place but that’s not likely to happen

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

They’d just be replaced by soft woods to be cut down every 20 or 30 years. Trees are nice, but North America’s old growth forests are what they are at this point. They’re not a great carbon sink, either.

IMHO, trees got stuck in the mind of the environmentalist movement in the 1970s, and it distracted from a bunch of things that were way more important. I’d almost call it controlled opposition.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Would work if we decentralized the fuck out of everything and people could live in the forests

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

The industry interference: Here have more of the stinky cancer paper tubes that don’t do anything but make you addicted then sooth the addiction.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

There is a high from nicotine, it just goes away so quickly as you get addicted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

It also goes away quickly when not addicted.

Source: tried nicotine, was disappointed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Try it again!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

That’s not the only thing they do. They also reduce your capacity for work… and life. I have a reason to believe that people dying from “overwork” are actually because:

  1. People work (and play) more when they are young and in school etc.
  2. Get used to their ability to work as much and subconsciously set a mental bar.
  3. Get into office space full of secondary smoke / start smoking
  4. Smoke reduces their ability
  5. They don’t realise their reduced ability and keep on working as much as previously set bar.
  6. dedz

Just a hypothesis. No scientific backing.

… other than first hand exp with reducing ability to work after long term exposure in a heavily contaminated environment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

What offices have smoke?

Overwork is still very common despite less people smoking.

Also, nicotine is a simulant and really doesn’t make you less productive. Just like coffee won’t. Actually there’s an argument it should help.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

nicotine

I won’t act like I know what comes out of people’s exhalation after they come into an unventilated room after smoking in the stairway just next to it (with the only door blocking anything, being always kept open), but I can say for sure that:

  1. Cigarettes give out much more than just nicotine vapour.
  2. The smokers in question have proven to be neither more competent, nor more productive. On the contrary, they sit around, asking other ppl to do their work (in the name of help) and as the other people waste their own time explaining their work as they do it, the smokers don’t even learn from what is being taught to them.

If it is a stimulant that comes out of that smoke, it’s definitely stimulating unwanted attributes of the brain.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

Millennials killing the tobacco industry

permalink
report
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 11K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 273K

    Comments