You all remember just a few weeks ago when Sony ripped away a bunch of movies and TV shows people “owned”? This ad is on Amazon. You can’t “own” it on Prime. You can just access it until they lose the license. How can they get away with lying like this?

204 points
*

If they’re saying “own” on their advertisements then they should be required to refund you when they eventually have to take it away. I’m pretty sure “ownership” has a legal definition and it’s probably not too ambiguous.
It should at least be considered false advertising if they can’t guarantee access permanently.

permalink
report
reply
139 points

That’s the best part

They redefine “own” and “buy” in their TOS

And so do many many other online retailers that sell digital goods

permalink
report
parent
reply
84 points

I wonder if that would hold in court. They could simply use “rent” or “lease” in their ads, but they purposely are trying to mislead to imply permanence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

The people who can afford to fight this kind of court case have no interest in doing so.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Anything holds in court when you have more money than several small nations combined.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Or “watch”. That way they don’t have to make it obvious that their customers won’t own it but still don’t straight up lie.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Then it’s not binding and they’re just waiting for the class action. Which will win, but they’ll still be richer in the end.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

This is modern alchemy trying to turn lead into gold. Just change the meaning of the magic words et voilá you make gold while the other party is robbed blind and can’t do anything about it after the fact.

And of course, it’s totally legal and totally cool.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

They actually never mention the idea of you owning content in their tos https://www.primevideo.com/help?nodeId=202095490&view-type=content-only

It’s “purchased digital content”

(iii) purchase Digital Content for on-demand viewing over an indefinite period of time (“Purchased Digital Content”)

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Which is exactly like physical media. You never owned it you bought a license to view it on that particular disk. But it also had limitations put on it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

ok that makes me sick

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

Refunding the sale price is still theft. If it was only worth that much to me (zero surplus), then I wouldn’t have bothered with the trade in the first place. The only things worth buying are worth more to you than the sale price.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Oh I had never thought of this or come across this concept! That’s a really elegant concept. Of course, in a transaction you’re putting in more effort than the money. The time it takes you to go through the purchase, the research, the cost of opportunity of that money… meaning those have to be covered in the cost of the transaction, and therefore the goods must be cheaper than the perceived value by those amounts.

You’ve sent me down a rabbit hole and I thank you for that. Now I’m off to read about economics 🤓

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points

Refunding the sale price is still theft.

What did you lose in this theft?

You got back everything you paid and you still got to enjoy the movie.

The way I see it you benefited from this transaction.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

A dollar today is worth more than a dollar in 1 year

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

You lost the ability to enjoy it forever, and that’s what the language at time of sale said you’d have.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Refunding the sale price is still theft.

What did you lose in this theft?

Is there really nothing in your home right now you would be sad if someone took and just gave you the money you paid for it?

Even a digital copy of a movie may not be so easy to replace on the services I have access to.

Stores are not allowed to go home to people and take back the stuff they sold, even if they refund the price. Neither should a company that advertise “pay this price and own this movie” rather than “pay this price and rent it for an indeterminate time”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Oh, whoops. I read it as them explicitly telling me to pirate it. Yeah of course they aren’t going to let you actually own it. That doesn’t come close to making sense.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

“rent a license for 15 years”

permalink
report
parent
reply
118 points

Did you click on it? Maybe it links to a torrent :D

permalink
report
reply
76 points

I used to buy movies on Amazon, assuming it worked like Steam does, where if Steam loses the license to sell it, you still have the ability to play it even if Steam isn’t allowed to sell it.

Hell I still have access to the stuff I got back when Steam still sold movies (I honestly miss Steam movies…)

When people started telling me their copies of things they owned were no longer usable once Amazon stopped selling it, I stopped buying.

IF BUYING ISN’T OWNING PIRACY ISN’T STEALING!

permalink
report
reply
9 points

I haven’t ran into a situation where any of the digital copies of things I bought have been pulled. So I can’t speak to what happened with your friends. But I will say that if you have any purchased digital copies of movies, you should at least setup Movies Anywhere and link all accounts you have. It isn’t like how Steam will still allow you to download a pulled game. But it does give you copies of things on multiple sources once linked. So if you got something on Amazon, it would also be linked as “purchased” on other services like Vudu, YouTube/Play Movies, Apple, etc… It won’t apply to everything you have got but would likely cover most big name items.

It used to be marked with the old “Ultraviolet” branding, but when that was shutdown the basic underlying service was transferred to Movies Anywhere. Most of the time you can see which things would count because they have the MA logo. Not great for smaller releases and most shows won’t be part of it (atm at least). Though some shows might also show up, as I have seen things from HBO and some other ones.

All that being said. You are very much correct about “buying isn’t owning” these days. And even when there is something like MA, there are still thousands of movies and shows that will only ever get a digital “release” from torrents/P2P. Sad that some cool shit will never get a real HD re-master for Blu-ray (let alone streaming). I very much feel that studios should have at best a 10 year window to make whatever sales before the masters should be copied to public archives. If the studios won’t do it, then there are more than plenty of people out there that would do the job for the love of keeping old media preserved and accessible. Also bullshit when I try to go the “legal” route and find a show on one service in HD but only in SD on others. It is pretty infuriating to see that in some cases I can only get like season 2 of something on say Vudu for example, but season 1 is seemingly exclusive to Amazon. And one is in HD and the other is only SD.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I looked at Movies Anywhere and

  • US only
  • Movies bought only (no series, does not support rentals)
  • sounds like they offer a unified interface to multiple providers - but you’re saying it unlocks the bought movies on the other platforms? - if it’s only a frontend it’d not help in keeping access
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I did fail to mention it is US only (my bad in that). Though it could get expanded if it is popular enough and it can be pointed to as “reducing piracy.” But international laws being complicated from nation to nation is also an issue, or at least something they might say. I haven’t been out of the country since setting it up, so I am curious if I would need a VPN to access my licensed stuff. Maybe would work for folks that have made accounts in the past with VPN? Idk.

It does work with some very limited sets of shows. But like I said, they aren’t really about that and the shows tend to be from studios like HBO. But not helpful for most anything other than movies.

It is a unified interface, but if I buy a MA labeled movie from say Vudu. It will also show-up in my iTunes, Microsoft, YouTube/Google Movies, Amazon, and of course MA. They have some additional connected services via Direct TV and Verizon, but I don’t use those. But the point is that if I get it on one of the services I connected, they become available on all of them. Even when the UltraViolet service went down, I didn’t lose the things I had bought. Though I think that Disney must have bought their connections and the UV stuff was migrated. Though I am not sure of those details. Either way it didn’t lead to me losing anything.

It also does require that you periodically sign back into their site to re-connect each provider similar to how you have to sign back into other sites. But again, I at no point have lost access to what was in my account if I haven’t signed in to re-verify. It isn’t as cut and dry as having the physical discs or a torrented copy on a NAS. But it is still worth knowing about if you have “legit” copies. I really wish that there were a way to link my Plex account and be able to watch them in the same front-end as my local stuff though. But no way that is going to happen unless Plex completely stops supporting the Plex Server and works out deals to use APIs of stuff like Vudu, Amazon, iTunes, etc…

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I had an Oculus account. I bought games for Oculus. Facebook forced me to link my Facebook account to it. Facebook removed Oculus accounts so it was all under Facebook accounts. Facebook deleted my account. I no longer owned the games I bought. I deleted the Facebook app.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I thought the facebook account requirement was removed

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It may have been, but I wouldn’t know. I’m never going back on that platform again. They stole a couple hundred dollars worth of games from me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
64 points

I am on the belief that once I buy something, let’s say Spiderman No Way Home, on streaming services, I am entitled to download it offline from anywhere for my own Jellyfin.

No one, or even biggest corp, can change my view.

permalink
report
reply
18 points

Downloading stuff like this for personal use is in fact perfectly legal in many countries

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

If only they allowed you to do it easily…

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Well it is easy.

It’s just they don’t allow it.

One out of two ain’t bad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Laughs in screen record

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Even if you don’t pay for it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

In Switzerland it technically is legal. Only hosting for others is illegal.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Depends on the country

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

They said buy, which means paying.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

In some countries making a private copy isn’t legal if copy protections are in place. Even if those copy protections are useless.

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points
*

Nobody with enough money has sued… Yet…

permalink
report
reply
14 points

I mean, you can “buy” stuff in Amazon Prime Video off service. Unlike Netflix or other platforms, they will let you “buy or rent” streaming movies, which is the same as finding the movie on the Amazon storefront and buying the digital copy instead of a physical copy.

Now, does that mean they won’t yank it? Not really. A digital license is a license, not a purchase. Is the word “buy” or “own” inaccurate? I’m hoping not, because like the Sony thing showed, platforms are desperate to not have the courts improvise what rights they owe the buyers on digital purchases.

I’m still buying my movies in 4K BluRay, though. And working on ripping all of them for streaming at home, now that I finally have the space.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

A digital license is a license, not a purchase.

Stop repeating copyright cartel propaganda.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

If buying isn’t owning, then you are being scammed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If they have access to remove the media from your library on their end, then it’s a license and not a purchase.

That doesn’t mean they don’t owe you access to it, though. The fact that there isn’t a word for “I’ve acquired perpetual access even if I can’t back up the file itself” doesn’t mean you shouldn’t have the right to continue to access the media. Or to demand that right to be upheld in court, for that matter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

It’s not digital though. When you bought any physical media you purchased a license to view the content. You never owned the media on the disk cause that is the studios IP.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

How are you digitizing BluRays? I’ve not found a way yet due to the DRM on those fuckers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Look into MakeMKV. It’s “free” while in beta (in practice you need to input a new license key from their forums occasionally, so inconvenient unless you buy a real license) and can rip Blu-Rays with no issue. For ripping 4K, though, you’ll need a drive that supports LibreDrive which bypasses all of the drive’s built-in DRM. I personally use an LG BU40N in a Vantec external enclosure.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s very interesting. But do you always have to buy Blu-ray just to get digital copies? I wonder if there is other options to actually own the movies without the licensing bullshit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

So far I don’t know of any services that will just hand you a digital file of a movie outside of physical media.

I say that’s a damn fine business opportunity, because I’d be all over it, but hey.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

That sounds more like what class action lawsuit is supposed to be for.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Damn straight. I want my $7.50!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Those are more to punish companies and change their behavior, which I think is what was desired here.

Of course they are a gold mine if you are a lawyer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Ross Scott of Accursed Farms is planning a lawsuit for something similar https://www.pcgamesn.com/the-crew/servers-shutdown-lawsuit

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

“I’m getting a lot of multi-page emails about possible legal proceedings and dozens of people claiming they have receipts,” Ross says. “I do want to emphasize that if I don’t get the help I need, then there will be no fundraiser, there will be no lawsuit, and this practice will continue unchallenged, at least in the US.”

Ross needs your help, lawyers!

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

This sort of blatant violation of the First Sale Doctrine shouldn’t even require a lawsuit to stop; the FTC should prosecute companies for it proactively. We need to demand our government start doing its goddamn job again.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

!piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Create post
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don’t request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don’t request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don’t submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-fi Liberapay

Community stats

  • 4.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 3.2K

    Posts

  • 77K

    Comments