The DOJ announced that as of Aug. 6, more than 1,106 defendants were charged in nearly all 50 states and Washington, D.C., for actions they took during insurrection.

129 points

I’d prefer a headline that reads convicted instead of charged.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

By the end of June 2023, about 700 defendants had been found guilty (most by pleading guilty, the rest convicted at trial), and over 550 of them had been sentenced. Hundreds were still awaiting trial or sentencing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Give it about two years

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I wish this didn’t feel so true

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The DOJ conviction rate puts the numbers at nearly the same.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-42 points

I would too, but that would imply we trust our judicial system. Given their wrongful conviction rate, I guarantee there’s at least a few falsely accused in there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
54 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-106 points

How’s that boot taste?

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

I think you’ve (somehow) read the opposite sentiment in that comment

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Found the traitor

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Shouldn’t you know?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Ratio’d

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-21 points

Retarded take.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
122 points
*

💀

permalink
report
reply
42 points

Carefully coordinated is a stretch. It was haphazardly coordinated at best.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

I’m sure the planning was done in a highly coordinated way. But project execution always comes down to your resources, and … well … the rioters aren’t exactly the yummiest crayons in the box.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

It’s was as carefully planned as a bunch uninformed, violent, gullible traitors coulld get

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I suppose we have to be thankful that collectively they couldn’t outwit a potato. It’s also fortunate for them as well because if they had actually succeeded in their objective they’d probably all been shot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Hey man, they did the best they could with the minds they had available.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

Coordinated yes. Carefully? Questionable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

As carefully as trump supporters are able.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Insurrection.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-13 points

By who?

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Idk, great question. Maybe it was the cult leader?

[Twice impeached, ex] president donald trump repeatedly said he wanted his supporters to fight Congress on accepting the electoral college results that showed Joe Biden won.

“We’re going to walk down to the Capitol, and we’re going to cheer on our brave senators, and congressmen and women,” Trump told his supporters shortly before the Capitol assault. “We’re probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them because you’ll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength, and you have to be strong.”

The words Trump used to urge his supporters to show up and “fight” on his behalf Jan. 6.

‘We will stop the steal’ ‘We will never give up. We will never concede. It doesn’t happen’ “You will have an illegitimate president. That is what you will have, and we can’t let that happen.” ‘If you don’t fight like hell you’re not going to have a country anymore’

“Let’s have trial by combat,” said Trump’s lawyer Rudy Giuliani, warming up the crowd for Trump.

Hmm. Who was leading this failed coup?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I wouldn’t say any of that is evidence of careful coordination. Careful implies intentional and thorough strategizing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

By multiple convicted insurrectionist groups, and trump.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

No but I mean specifically, as in who carefully coordinated. That’s my question.

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

"I ransacked the Capitol, and all I got was this striped shirt.”

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Orange is the new black (and white striped shirt)

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Fuck ‘em.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

But not literally. They don’t deserve your loins.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

I’m always curious when I read a thread and see that one downvote over and over on sane comments that have many upvotes. If you’re a conservative-leaning, elornmuskrat-apologist, conspiracy-minded type, why do you stick around here, on Lemmy, where you are clearly in the MEGA-minority, where peopler clearly dislike your views? Who are you, you dumb fuck?! Why are you here?

permalink
report
reply
15 points

They are desperate for the attention that being a contrarian invites, so of course they aren’t leaving.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

curious if your 1 downvote is for irony or not…

but back to the subject at hand… they get off on anger. it’s addicting. they’re addicted. if they leave, they won’t get high.

permalink
report
parent
reply

You can see who downvotes on kbin. Votes are public information in the Fediverse, Lemmy just chooses not to display it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Maybe they’re being downvoted because they’re uninteresting comments that add nothing to the discussion?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Not that I am that downvote but do you think it is a good idea to create an echo chamber?

Personally I think it is a very bad idea and while I don’t agree with many posts, I prefer alternate views more than a bunch of people telling me how right I am.

permalink
report
parent
reply
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

What client do you want that shows the upvotes and downvotes?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Desktop and Jerboa do.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 386K

    Comments