9 points

Unsurprising. Authoritarian governors want governors to have more authority.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

What a horribly biased and misleading headline!

Texas troops are not making anything more secure. They’re murdering and otherwise brutalizing people who have done nothing wrong with no benefit except for political points for a fascist.

permalink
report
reply
19 points

This “news” site has an ad telling me about how socialist billionaire are hoarding there wealth and how I can too (they are selling gold coins)

permalink
report
reply
2 points

You’re seeing ads? All I’m seeing is a clean website. How 'bout stepping into the 21st century and use an ad-blocker.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I have one. My ad blocker wasn’t what I thought someone was going to try to give me an inferiority complex about today.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

This is one of the wackiest, though not surprising, stories lately.

SCOTUS tells Texas that in order for the border patrol agents to apprehend immigrants, they have the constitutional authority to move or cut razor wire. Texas responds with a threat of deploying the national guard to patrol the borders. Texans, this is your governor trying to spend your tax dollars to do something the entire country is already paying for.

This isn’t unlike congress sitting on their asses arguing over specifics to mediate the crisis at the border. Everyone (mostly) wants the same thing but politics is getting in the way of actionable solutions. It’s all bullshit to garner support from single-issue voters. They say their number one issue is “the border” yet they only care about the lies that come out of their elected politicians mouths over supporting actual immigration reform and diverting a fraction of our military budget to ease issues causing people to seek asylum to begin with.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Abbott isn’t the sharpest tool in the shed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

But he’s a useful bludgeon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I find it interesting that those single issue voters who care about “the border” only really care about the southern border, even though the drugs they want to stop are smuggled in from the east and west coast and the bad people they want to keep out are coming across via airplane.

what I’m saying is that these people should want the canadian border, all international airports, and coastal ports of entry as militarized as the southern border but they don’t say shit about the others.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

There aren’t hundreds of thousands of migrants a month coming over the Canadian border. It is, in and of itself, a legit bipartisan concern.

The issue I have is the narrative and fear mongering dividing us and preventing our politicians from accomplishing anything. Having just searched on the issue for a mere ten minutes, it’s clear that politicians and news organizations are using a variety of numbers to prover their side of the story (how a news outlet can have a side is still something that makes me fume). There’s numbers related to “crossings”, “apprehensions”, “migrants”, “asylum seekers”, “detentions”, and “deportations” that can all be used or ignored to prove one or the other side is more strict or lenient regarding the southern border. Even the historically neutral organizations I found in my quick search focused on one issue at a time making the entire story unclear.

No one’s actually trying to help anyone here. The human race is doomed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You’re assuming they wouldn’t just as quickly move to close off (or create) any of those other borders if given the chance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

Traitors

permalink
report
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 388K

    Comments