Former President Trump said Friday he plans to appeal after a jury ordered him to pay $83.3 million for defaming writer E. Jean Carroll, who had alleged he sexually assaulted her decades ago.

“Absolutely ridiculous! I fully disagree with both verdicts, and will be appealing this whole Biden Directed Witch Hunt focused on me and the Republican Party,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “Our Legal System is out of control, and being used as a Political Weapon.”

“They have taken away all First Amendment Rights,” he added. “THIS IS NOT AMERICA!”

Friday’s ruling by a jury in New York marked the second time Carroll has won damages from Trump at trial, with the new total adding to a $5 million verdict last year finding Trump liable for sexually abusing Carroll and defaming her over a separate comment.

115 points

He can’t appeal until he deposits the $83,300,000 to an escrow account.

**

permalink
report
reply
47 points
*

I didn’t know this, so you’re not allowed to even start your appeal process until you place the damages you owe into escrow?

Just to make sure I’m getting this correctly. I love learning ways that dumps can’t protect himself

permalink
report
parent
reply
78 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Fantastic

permalink
report
parent
reply
71 points
*

The requested bond is generally an amount greater than the judgment sum—CPLR 5519 requires that post-judgment interest and cost are included in the amount. New York State has a 9% statutory interest running on any judgment entered. In New York State, we set the bond amount at 120% of the judgment.

Probably closer to $100 million after the 120%👍

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Rad, thanks

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

He will have to put up nearly 100 million in cash or other assets to get his appeal. He already did that for the original case. If his appeals fail, the court will cut her a check.

https://courtbondnow.com/bonding-procedures/appeal-bonds-101/#:~:text=The requested bond is generally,at 120%25 of the judgment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

$83MM paid for by the hordes of morons that eat his shit daily. He won’t spend a penny.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

If it pulls money from his campaign (which is likely), I am here with the shaudenfreude and popcorn 🍿

permalink
report
parent
reply
66 points
*

“Absolutely ridiculous! I fully disagree with both verdicts, and will be appealing this whole Biden Directed Witch Hunt focused on me and the Republican Party,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “Our Legal System is out of control, and being used as a Political Weapon.”

Says the man who’s making this political…

This had nothing to do with Biden or the Republican Party… He’s been tried & found guilty of defaming E. Jean Carroll.

permalink
report
reply
41 points

You know this… I know this… Literates know this…

His cultists on the other hand? That shit was rolled up, fried, and gobbled down like an Independence Day barbecue. The entitled ape is actively trying to spearhead the start of an American Civil War II because he didn’t win.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

…for raping her. He could have not sexually assaulted her, he could have not defamed her, he could have not defamed her a second time. All problems of his own making. I’ve never even imagined this level of “find out” even existed.

But it has to be said: Republicans are still solidly behind him, this is who they want! Absolutely disgusting…

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

Breaking it down:

Absolutely ridiculous! I fully disagree with both verdicts

Well, that’s not surprising…

and will be appealing this whole Biden Directed Witch Hunt

Biden has nothing, NOTHING, to do with a New York civil case.

focused on me and the Republican Party

No, it’s just you.

Our Legal System is out of control, and being used as a Political Weapon.

It would be so much worse for you if that were true.

They have taken away all First Amendment Rights! THIS IS NOT AMERICA!

You don’t have the right to repeatedly defame someone when you ALREADY lost a lawsuit for defaming them.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

Speech is free, lies are expensive.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

[…] where he is the likely nominee for the Republican Party. He is also facing a total of 91 felony counts across federal charges in Washington, D.C., and Florida and state charges in New York and Georgia.

Just want to point out this gem of a paragraph out the bottom of the article…

Less than a decade ago I’d have laughed if you told me that someone could be currently in trial for best part of 100 felony charges, on top of having already been impeached for attempted insurrection, and still legitimately be a candidate for president of the United States

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Less than a decade ago? Were you around to vote against Bush Sr’s backbirth the first term? Were you there when he got judges to grant him his second? “Less than a decade” is a naive breadth of scope in politics, all due respect.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Bush Sr. was never indicted. He should have been for Iran-Contra, but he wasn’t. Trump has 91 indictments. That’s how much worse he’s been than Bush Sr.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

That’s not the point at all, especially since I was referring to Jr. It’s been murderous fucking assclowns for decades, citizen. Generations, even. (Ah, Carter. Sweet ol’ Jimmy.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Well, “legitimately” depends on your point of view.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Well, with the point of view of someone who actually has their eyes open, Trump will legitimately be the nominee of the R’s.

Scary proposition.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Whitehouse: I can’t hear you over all of this money…

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Not sure if The Hill was on autopilot or not, but they didn’t need to call it “alleged” rape, it’s been proven in a court.

That it was is quite literally a basis of this defamation case…

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Legally speaking, the finding of fact was “sexual abuse,” because of a very stupid legal definition of “rape.”

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 388K

    Comments