Fossil is quitting smartwatches::Fossil is going to stop making smartwatches. It was one of the most prolific companies creating Wear OS watches.

3 points

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The company announced this afternoon that it would leave the smartwatch business and redirect resources to its less-smart goods instead.

The company has been one of the most prolific makers of Wear OS smartwatches over the years, and its absence will leave a large gap in the market.

“Fossil Group is redirecting resources to support our core strength and the core segments of our business that continue to provide strong growth opportunities for us: designing and distributing exciting traditional watches, jewelry, and leather goods under our own as well as licensed brand names.”

This shouldn’t come as a huge shock if you’ve been paying attention to Fossil the past few months.

The company regularly put out smartwatches through Wear OS’s toughest years and was often a permanent fixture at CES.

What’s more, Fossil was expected to announce news of a new Gen 7 featuring the Qualcomm Snapdragon W5 Plus platform in 2023 — however, it was nothing but crickets the entire year.


The original article contains 287 words, the summary contains 160 words. Saved 44%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

permalink
report
reply
29 points

That’s a shame. I really liked my Fossil before I switched to the Apple Watch. It did a fantastic job of looking like a normal watch while still being a decent smartwatch.

permalink
report
reply
24 points

The square face of the Apple Watch really irks me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

That’s precisely why they designed it this way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

That’s precisely why they designed it this way.

What? Can you explain what you mean here or is this just Apple hate?

I find it hard to believe that any company, much less one with such a high reputation for aesthetic, would design something specifically to irk people.

I think it was designed rectangular because it’s easier for smartphone app developers to make watch versions of their apps, easier to display data, and generally fits with the look of the rest of their rounded rectangular products.

As a watch it isn’t as visually appealing, but as a device it’s (arguably) more useful.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

I know I’m in the minority, but I switched from a square Android watch (LG G Watch from the neolithic era) to a round watch, and I miss the square. A round screen is awkward for anything but a simple watch face, IMO. I use my new watch much less than my old watch, partly because of this, and I don’t think I’ll ever buy another one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I agree. I’ve gotten used to it, and I can understand its usefulness for ease of app development and density of data. But I miss having a circular watchface.

permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points

The Apple part of the Apple Watch really irks me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Visually as a watch design I agree with you. Having used quite a few round face smart watches before getting an Apple Watch I can absolutely see why Apple went with a square face. It just makes way more sense for displaying data. A square space displays more information in a an easier to read format.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I love my pre-smart era Fossil watch. I hope they go back to making classy digital watches again, I would buy another.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Same. Mine is a regular watch with hour and minute hands and a digital read-out in the background that I can turn on and off. It’s nothing fancy, but I wear it with a fat black leather wrist-band which is pleasing to my easily-entertained soul.

I am a simple man in many ways.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

That’s sad but at the same time, their QC wasn’t that great, I had a ring fall off of one and the entire back fall off the other.

permalink
report
reply
52 points
*

Damn. Big fan of their hybrid smart watches (e-ink screen, ~10 day battery and looked like a watch).

Anyone know of any good similar products?

permalink
report
reply
17 points

I don’t know of any e-ink displays outside of Fossil but give Garmin a try. I use the Vivoactive 4 and get a week+ of battery.

I went from Pebble > Fossil > Garmin.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Watchy which is open source and comes in a build it yourself kit has an e-ink display.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I came across the project before but they don’t have biometric stats that I was looking for.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yep - Garmin Venu 3 here. I just charged and it’s telling me 15 days of battery, but with my use I’ll probably charge it in 12-13 days.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Garmin are atrocious compared to hybrid watches or the legendary pebble. Had one for like a week before I sent it back, there was so much wrong with it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Care to elaborate?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

My Hybrid’s screen died under 9 months of use. The e-ink screen started to fade. Not sure if it was from sun light or maybe knocked around.

I haven’t had the Garmin for as long yet but it’s nice enough to use outdoors.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Garmin is know for excellent battery life. I don’t think they use e-ink though.

A much bigger drawback (to me at least) they lack Google Pay support and keep pushing Garmin Pay which is not widely supported.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

?

Is there really any functional difference which backend is providing that virtual card number? I have never seen a terminal anywhere that A) supported contactless in the first place, but B) did not work with the Garmin Pay feature of my Fenix 6. Even out in the sticks. Not-a-one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The difference is in the bank support. All contactless terminals support all NFC payment providers. But banks don’t. Each bank chooses with which services to integrate, and this part is not standardized so it requires some investment on the bank side.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

My Coros Pace 2 will go 2+ weeks without a charge if I don’t use it much. Don’t think it’s e-ink and I wouldn’t really call it a smart watch. You can get texts and weather but when it syncs with the phone. It’s more of a fitness watch.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Withings. Small oled display, looks like an analog watch until you use it. Ton of sensors to monitor your health, or none if you don’t want that. And a huge battery. Like huge enough to lose the charger between charges 😆

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I’ll second this, stupid good battery life but a fairly simple watch. Doesn’t do apps but it does health tracking and notifications and it’s pretty good at looking like a watch instead of a toy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Don’t they demand a subscription for any useful data like Ouraring does?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

The subscription is totally optional. I never bought it, and I get everything I need on the app.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Easily the best actual watch with sensors option. Love mine, and being waterproof too is fantastic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Even more, I get pretty consistently 3 weeks per charge with my fossil hybrid

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Garmin Instinct has a 30d battery. I’ve used one for just over a year and it’s all I need from a connected watch.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I use the tic pro 5.

Its 3-5 days a but I have everything on and work out every day.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Another vote for Garmin instinct (2 solar in my case). Not E-ink but oldschool style black/white LCD. Full charge with nightly pulsox is just above 2 weeks, would be 3 if i turned off nightly pulsox. With solar, if you are active outside and have a sunny climate, you probably do not need to charge basically at all.

There is also the instinct crossover for the hybrid look. But first series instincts are supposedly hit or miss on the software. And trust me, the whole analogue watch thing is nice for looks, but really you will not look at it if you have a digital clock on the watch face.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 543K

    Comments