34 points

It’s funny that I never considered it, but why would they replace the low wage workers? Capitalism would care most about replacing the high wage workers (except for the CEO and other board members. They obviously are worth every penny and are irreplaceable with ai. ~signed CEO)

permalink
report
reply
7 points

The high earners’ jobs are already mostly replaced by technology, but companies keep employing them and paying them anyway. They mostly schedule meetings.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

the issue if you don’t employ the smart people, someone else will… and you don’t want that typa competition, it is cheaper to just pay them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

If companies made logical decisions, yes.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

because robots are still 10x cheaper than the low wage workers (in developed countries at least), and low wage worker jobs are usually easier to automate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

A good AI is the ultimate CEO: tireless, ruthless, informed, fully capable of generating bullshit yet completely immune to others’ bullshit. It has no friends, no family, no property, no conflicts of interest, no ego, no drama, no childhood dreams to fulfill, no lovers to impress, and only one ambition: to maximize profit for the company it manages, by any means necessary.

I look forward to finding out whether Wall Street’s first loyalty is to aristocracy or to money, because they will soon be forced to choose.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

It’s important to not call executives workers

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Well, at least sex robots will service the undesirables.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

The sex robots will be crazy expensive for a while there. Only the rich will afford them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

they already cornered the sex market as is!

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

they don’t need sex robots; they can afford to pay for the real thing

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

This happens when capitalists own both labor and the robots.

permalink
report
reply
-2 points

AI generated content is NOT art

permalink
report
reply
2 points

You’re telling me Planet Mountain Dew isn’t a masterpiece?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I disagree with that as a blanket statement. Humans have always used tools to augment our artistic capabilities, and AI is just the newest, shiniest tool. The fact that corps want to replace human artists with machines for cost cutting does not invalidate use cases like an independent singer-wongwriter from generating an album cover for themselves based on their lyrics.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Screenshots are not memes

permalink
report
reply
5 points

We’re 10k users. There’s not that much content on here. I didn’t post almost ever on reddit, but considering we need content, I steal images I find funny off imgur and post them here in an attempt to add content to the network.

If we fragment our ‘funny posts’ in tens of subreddits from dozens of instances most users aren’t subscribed to or don’t often browse, we’ll have a lot less to keep ourselves entertained.

Instead of trying to gatekeep when we hardly have enough users, why don’t you post things you do find appropriate for this subreddit and just scroll past or downvote what upsets you and move on? There’s no place or need for this sort of elitism and offering nothing better in return right now.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 259K

    Comments