I thought I would knock some dust off my drafting skills after a small chat with @captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works

Seeing this image on the tutorial made me realize, FreeCAD seems to be a Technical Geometry Super-Suite. It makes sense that CAD would grow to include all of these things. But I thought sharing the initial perspective of some one who hasn’t looked at this stuff in about 18 years might be interesting.

Granted I’m not actually familiar with most of this stuff, and none of it from the POV of FreeCAD. If this can deliver 10% of what I’m looking at, I’m in for a treat.

43 points

Seems like a good opportunity to ask if anyone can recommend learning materials for FreeCAD? Used Solidworks and AutoCAD in school but fell back on tinkercad for a recent project just cause I didn’t have time to invest in learning.

permalink
report
reply
0 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I find that Onshape is quite good and is all browser based so it runs quite well on linux.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

This is a pretty good tutorial to get started in FreeCAD. Just watch out for the topological naming issue. They still haven’t fixed it, but if you know how to avoid it, you shouldn’t have too much trouble.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

That is an insane bug to have in your CAD software, I don’t see how it’s usable for any slightly complex part.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Literally every CAD program suffers this to a greater or lesser degree. There are workarounds but they’re clunky.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

This is a pretty good tutorial to get started in FreeCAD

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Parametric is such a leap, when coming from toy blocks like TinkerCad in which I can really easily do all that I want except those sexy fillets…

I really want to learn it but it feels so convoluted and difficult. I’m aware that FreeCAD is not the easiest, and some commercial packages are easier to grok but their licensing is really hostile to simple hobbyists so I am trying to to take the high road, for now anyway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

If you don’t want to make parametric models, you can build simpler things by combining primitive shapes in the FreeCAD part workbench. You can even fillet and chamfer them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Hey, I have used freecad a lot. FreeCAD is good, not great as a cad software. But it is the only truly “no strings attached.” The problem with it was development was almost at a standstill for things that actually mattered. A new company has formed around commercializing it and are working with the original Dev team.

Updated UI, topological naming fix, some assembly and actual functional defaults were promised for Q1 2024 and releasing it as a 1.0 version.

I think it is worth it to learn how to use right now as in the next 2 years it should become an actual viable CAD alternative for things outside of simple projects.

I wouldn’t try parametric models in freecad. They use a really really bad spreadsheet reference system that recalculates you model, not on every change, but every CLICK which means that when you have a variable that is reference more than 10 times or so, it begins to take longer and longer to even start to enter a new value. One time it took 5+ minutes just to get into the spreadsheet cell before even being able to edit its contents.

For parametric, use OpenSCAD (or openscad in freecad) until they implement actual, working variables.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

I often read that the UI is pretty unintuitive compared to the commercial competitors. I anyhow started with FreeCAD three years ago and never looked back. I design a lot of functional 3D prints with it and managed to solve all the issues I’ve faced so far. As I started with FreeCAD and never tried the alternatives, I also don’t miss the possibly more intuitive UIs 😁

permalink
report
reply
5 points

I tried qcad around 2010 or so and found the UI horrible compared to autocad that I was used to. At this point in my life, drafting was pretty useless. So I had no reason to have cad unless it was free.

I found OpenScad in Y2020 and was amazed at how far it had come. It felt much more like the commercial stuff, at least to me, who was behind the times anyway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

QCad still sucks compared to AutoCAD, but it is only around $50 for a license where AutoCAD is pretty much subscription only at this point I believe.

We actually use it at work, because our 2d drafting use cases are very limited, but we still need something DWG compatible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

From my perspective the biggest thing wrong with FreeCAD is that it’s a single threaded app in a multicore world. If you load large stuff, the app freezes and one core is working really hard for a while.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Isn’t like every CAD program single core? People got scammed hard with Xeon in the past. CAD PC salesmen had/have absolutely no idea what they were talking about

Biggest speedup has been the GPU integration. The single core stuff doesn’t seem to matter much anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Mastercam does pretty well once you force it to use hardware accelleration

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

No, it’s the topological naming problem. End of.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

That doesn’t have me wait for tens of minutes while one core slogs it’s guts out and the other fifteen sit there idle.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Solidworks is the same way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Can’t say I’m surprised.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Needs a better logo as well

permalink
report
reply
6 points

Actually that’s a great place for some “I want to help but I don’t know computers” people to jump in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Yep, there’s a ton of great Foss projects that have a shitty logo. Look at Octave, looks like something 10yo me made in MS paint in 5 min

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Logos, GUI, names…

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

FreeCAD is fairly good. Some of the controls are a bit wonky, but that is just a minor gripe. If you are starting on FreeCAD, that doesn’t matter so much. FreeCAD is good to know if you design components for KiCAD as well.

Parametric modeling is fucking awesome, btw. I am not quite sure how old that concept is though.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

At least a decade, probably more

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Even Freecad is well over a decade old. Opencascade is over 20.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’ve been only doing cad for about 10 years so my knowledge is somewhat limited. I was talking about parametrics specifically. I should have made that clear

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

All 3D modeling software has absolutely terrible controls. I’m not sure there’s a right way to do it through a 2D interface.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I have seen people use pens and tablets for sculpting in Blender so that is an option. For my CAD work I do have a SpaceMouse but that is only really useful for large projects.

Until we get holographic projection (Iron Man style) I am not quite sure what a 3D system would look like, TBH.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Pretty old, I’d say 30 years. It’s what made pro/e, one of the first 3d cad systems, so famous within Boeing.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Open Source

!opensource@lemmy.ml

Create post

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

  • Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
  • No NSFW content
  • No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

Community stats

  • 4.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.8K

    Posts

  • 30K

    Comments