107 points

Thomas: Ethics are for poors

permalink
report
reply
56 points

“Ethics are not in the constitution”

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

What he would actually say…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Is that a textualist or originalist interpretation of the constitution?

In other words…

Are the Supreme Priests going to go by the strict definition of the words or the way they feel the founding fathers intended the words? Ahh who am I kidding?? They are just playing…

"Who’s line is it anyway?: Supreme Edition

The court where everything’s made up and the constitution don’t matter"

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Thomas: fuck you I got mine

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

And the blacks /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
80 points

And yet there are 0 consequences for not doing so. What is Congress going to do?

permalink
report
reply
53 points

In sane times there was impeachment. But we are not living in those sane times.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Congress is legally allowed to impeach any SCOTUS justice they want.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

And the chances of it actually leading to removal from SCOTUS hover around zero.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Blame Congress for that. It’s their fault for never actually using their abilities.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

What are the consequences if state or federal government decided not to follow a Supreme Court ruling? It’s up to the Attorney General to enforce the laws of the Justice Department and that position is a presidential appointee.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Congress can also impose a mandate on the executive branch if they got out of hand. The issue is SCotUS is clearly out of hand now, yet congress is doing nothing. The whole “checks and balances” system is idealistic and clearly flawed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

impose a mandate

the law for us poors is “do it or men with guns will put you in a box”. what men with guns does congress have to force the president to do what scotus tell him to?

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

Correction Democratic Senators call for ethics code, Republican Senators say the branches should not monitor each other.

permalink
report
reply
24 points

They think “checks and balances” refers to campaign donations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

They stop listening after the “checks” hit their pocket and never hear the last part of your sentence.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Important distinction

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

Seriously. Why are they getting handouts when they can legally get rich on insider trading, like normal Congress members? (/s in case you think I’m serious)

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Why not do both?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

One is legal and other isn’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

They’re both effectively legal when none of our elected lawmakers will hold them accountable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

everything is legal when you’re the final word on what the law is and your only oversight is death itself

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

A guillotine should be fine, behead a couple corrupt judges and the rest should fall in line quickly enough.

permalink
report
reply
-2 points

Yeah nothing like going old-school French Revolution and killing a few million people then having a couple civil wars to really sus out who is a “true American.”

They call it the Reign of Terror because it was so much fun!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

It’s not about being a true american, it’s about finally putting up a boundary against fascism. Granted, Robespierre was doing his own brand of fascism with the guillotine but we don’t have to repeat this part of history.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You see it that way, and millions of others see it as “the socialist takeover” or whatever nonsense, and all of a sudden we have mobs of people killing each other

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 465K

    Comments