One of Google Search’s oldest and best-known features, cache links, are being retired. Best known by the “Cached” button, those are a snapshot of a web page the last time Google indexed it. However, according to Google, they’re no longer required.

“It was meant for helping people access pages when way back, you often couldn’t depend on a page loading,” Google’s Danny Sullivan wrote. “These days, things have greatly improved. So, it was decided to retire it.”

57 points

These days, things have greatly improved.

Websites will never change their URLs today.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

i maintain redirects for old URLs for which the content still exists at another address. i’ve been doing that since i started working on web sites 20-some years ago. not many take the time to do that, but i do. so there’s at least a few web sites out there that if you have a 20 year old bookmark to, chances are it still works.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Sites are actually 83% less likely to go offline these days.

Source.

permalink
report
parent
reply
146 points

That’s bs, it’s one of the best features Google has and they’ve been ruining it. Wayback machine wished it could be that comprehensive.

permalink
report
reply
59 points

Wayback is definitely more comprehensive than Google. I’ve only seen three occasions of links Google has saved that Wayback hasn’t.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

i fear for the days when some cruel unfeeling interest comes for archive.org too

permalink
report
parent
reply
74 points

We that’s some shit. I often use that to get info off of pages that I won’t be clicking on normally.

permalink
report
reply
42 points

I find this very useful to read paywalled articles that Google has managed to index!

OK, I see why they might want to get rid of it.

permalink
report
reply
70 points

there are half a dozen still very good reasons to keep this feature and one not to: lost ad revenue

assholes

permalink
report
reply
8 points

I can’t imagine there was even that much lost revenue. Cached pages are good for seeing basic content in that page but you can’t click through links or interact with the page in any way. Were so many people using it to avoid ads?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

Were so many people using it to avoid ads?

I doubt that as well. There are much better ways to deal with ads. I always only used it when the content on the page didn’t exist anymore or couldn’t be accessed for whatever reason.

But I suspected this was coming, they’ve been hiding this feature deeper and deeper in the last few years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I honestly thought it was already gone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

but you can’t click through links or interact with the page in any way

Most of the time that’s exactly what I want. I hate hunting through 473 pages of stupid bullshit in some janky forum to try to find the needle in that haystack.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I feel like 99% of its usage was to avoid ads/paywalls/geo/account restrictions on news and social media sites

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You can’t lose what you never had. It’s desired ad revenue they’re after.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 16K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 557K

    Comments