Cross post 196
Why wait for climate change when you can just pick off chunks and bring them to a desert -__-
If you look at their current sourcing it’s fine. They’re not cutting apart glaciers, they’re gathering it from parts that have calved and will just melt apart regardless.
Greenland has a right to sell their natural resources as much as anyone else, and the sad thing is this admittedly ludicrous enterprise is more profitable for less environmental damage than most things.
The problem is all the carbon that is emitted to transport the ice from Greenland halfway around the world for no other reason than bullshit marketing.
Since Greenland Imports a lot and doesn’t really have a lot of export, a big part of the trip would be sailed anyway, just with empty containers
International overseas shipping is actually pretty carbon efficient as transport goes.
Hell they’re actually pretty down for efficiency improvements in shipping, to the point where people are just straight up talking about bringing back sails because… Well, why not? It’s free energy.
It’s not necessary but you compare this to crypto or deliberately inefficient vehicle design and it’s just not something to get upset about.
…ice which has never been polluted by any human being.
shows picture of human being polluting said ice
Rich people sicken me.
Guess I’ll post this again:
I put this in the cross post, bit figure it belongs here, too:
While ridiculous, there’s interesting context here.
- Greenland has little to no economy
- The ice is mined from ice that has already broken away from the glacier, thus not reducing any more than nature has already
- Cargo ships bringing frozen food used to leave empty, now that same fuel is used to transport ice back instead of going to waste
- The founder has always dreamed of a sustainable economy for Greenland
- He is conflicted about how his work to do this in a sustainable way is being taken
Lots of gray here.
The whole conversation, including how the ships are already there, details on economy, etc, are in this thread: https://lemmy.world/comment/6556590
Greenland has little to no economy because it has a population less than 60 000. And they still have to fly the ice to the middle east from Greenland which is hardly climate friendly.
Cause vs correlation, and untrue. There is no economy because there is only fish. The population dwindles because of immigration. As for flying the ice, that does not happen. Read the link.
Greenland’s per capita GDP is 13th in the world. They’re doing fine. Greenland has also always had a small population. It’s hardly fair to call it dwindling, when it’s about double today what it was in the 60s. Also a large part of the emigration is because the choices for higher education are very limited. Not because of a lack of industry or employment. As there is more than enough mining, fishing and tourism to sustain a population of 57000.
As for shipping the ice, I’m sure you aren’t going to try to tell me that keeping ice refrigerated from nuuk to Dubai as well as the extra fuel used to transport (ships displace more water when they have cargo) have less of a carbon footprint than simply freezing water in Dubai.
This is going to be how the zombie virus comes about. Someone ingests a million year old virus that becomes infectious and boom, we got new COVID.
We already had a novel one, so is the next one going to be neo COVID or cyber COVID or what? Or just new COVID, like new Coke?
