The Houston Democrat is recovering from abdominal surgery. Democrats did not expect him to attend the vote, but his surprise appearance sank the impeachment vote.

All of Texas’ House Republicans voted to impeach Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas for failing to secure the southern border, but the House fell short of passing the historic resolution on Tuesday after Rep. Al Green, D-Houston, rushed to the House from the hospital where he was recovering from abdominal surgery to vote no.

The impeachment failed on a 216-214 vote. Four Republicans joined all Democrats in voting against the impeachment. The House has not impeached a member of a president’s cabinet in nearly 150 years.

The vote was extremely close, with the outcome unknown until the end of the vote. U.S. Rep. Mike Gallagher, a Wisconsin Republican who chairs the House select committee on China, voted against the resolution. Numerous Republicans, including Texan Reps. Michael McCaul and Jodey Arrington were seen circling around Gallagher as he held out on his vote.

U.S. Reps. Ken Buck of Colorado and Tom McClintock of California also voted against impeachment. U.S. Rep. Blake Moore, R-Utah, ended up changing his vote to a no at the last minute, tanking the vote but allowing Republicans to bring it up again in the future.

House Republicans were counting on Green to be absent. But he arrived just in time in a wheelchair and scrubs to give Democrats enough votes to kill the impeachment.

17 points

Why would he have been in scrubs? He doesn’t work at the hospital, they don’t just hand those out to the patients.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

out to the patients.

He had abdominal surgery. I’m guessing you stay there for a bit until everything checks out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Scrubs are the things doctors and nurses wear, not patient garb.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Yeah, he should have went in his hospital gown instead. Bare ass.

Jesus Christ people… We get it, you want to spin this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

A scrub is a guy that thinks he’s fly, also known as a buster.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

In my experience they sometimes give scrubs to patients for various reasons.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

The hospital will have spare scrubs on hand, either for surgery or for staff to change if theirs get contaminated. Or, the patient pants are vaguely scrub like.

I’d guess they let him use some.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Occasionally for trauma victims or homeless people we give them scrubs to leave the hospital with if they don’t have their own clothes or if they want pants to walk around the hospital with (normal gowns notoriously show off your butt as the flaps are in the back)

permalink
report
parent
reply
44 points

Well, maybe they meant hospital gown? Or they gave him scrubs so his balls would not have amy chance to see daylight? Or maybe it was a stunt to get attention.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

I was thinking that last one might have been it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Yeah, we know. The only reason anyone would give a shit is if they’re desperately searching for something to latch onto and be upset about.

I’m sure his political affiliation is completely irrelevant and you do the same for Republicans.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Idk if it’s different in the US but when I went to a hospital in Canada for a broken leg they gave me scrubs and even let me keep the pants cause they were so comfy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I cant speak to all of the states, but when I had leg issues as well, I was doing my therapy walking down the hall in a hospital gown.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I imagine he didn’t want to leave the hospital in an open-back hospital gown. So they gave him scrubs.

Why are people even focusing on this? Who fucking cares if he was wearing scrubs??

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

I can’t speak to all hospitals, but I once came in to drop off flowers and they put scrubs on me and gave me two extra sets to use at home, as well as a boxset of the first season of Scrubs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Well I can no longer read Al as AL its ai always A.I. now

permalink
report
reply
15 points

Fonts need to clearly differentiate a lowercase L from an uppercase i. It’s so frustrating I don’t understand why this bad fonts are so widespread

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I don’t know either. For some reason we fell in love with Sans-Serif (e.g. Arial) for internet stuff. I’m guessing it’s because they look less “old fashioned” than that “newspaper-looking stuff.” Personally, I find serif fonts more readable, and they would distinguish "l" from "I".

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Same here. We’ve got some neat studies showing that serif fonts are read more quickly, which I would think is a big boon.

permalink
report
parent
reply
74 points

What a fucking joke. Seems pretty clear that one of their goals is to completely remove any meaning from the word “impeach,” so Trump’s tenure doesn’t look as bad.

Really great priorities.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

Were you around for Clinton? He got impeached for getting his knob sucked.

I don’t think Republicans have ever used it seriously.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Technically he got impeached for perjury. Pretty mild compared to Trump’s impeachments.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Still will never understand it though. Clinton got a blowy and Republicans lost their minds. Trump fucked a hooker and nobody batted an eye

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah but anyone who knows about that time will tell you that it’s much different and far worse now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

And they will still lie to their voters and blame everything on the Democrats.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Greene already did that. She blamed Democrats on doing something Republicans didn’t expect for them losing, but in an indignant “how dare they” tone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Did anyone reasonable think they actually want/intend to govern?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Meh, impeach is weak for Trump anyhow. Insurrection and possibly treason seem more in-line with his actions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

permalink
report
reply
66 points

It’s 2024 and congress still wants people to come in to the office to raise their hand.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Gotta keep those big oil hands well oiled.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

But not when they want to kill a bill in the Senate, they can filibuster without ever even coming into the chamber.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

During the Pandemic, Democrats approved rules allowing proxy voting. Of course, that was one of the first things Kevin (Remember him?) got rid of.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 385K

    Comments