134 points

In two ways. They also killed the chances of further good deals. When they aren’t in power why would democrats ever want to negotiate with them

permalink
report
reply
86 points

Because democrats are willing to do their jobs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

And here I thought Democrats even participating in a BS, “bipartisan” bill that only served to validate the xenophobia being put forth by the opposing party was appalling and a clear example of the utter failure they represent.

Then again, illegals is common vernacular now, so what the fuck do I even know, really.

I’ve voted for Dems my entire life, but you’ll never catch me saying they “do their jobs”. The party embarrasses me at nearly every opportunity; any support I have for/give to the party is despite its leadership, not because of it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Willing, and capable are different. They are politicians after all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Rolling over for republicans is in their job description?!

… that explains a few things…

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

When politics function correctly, that is what they are supposed to do in order to get concessions on other important things. Compromise leaves everyone unsatisfied.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

No, but Republicans convincing you it is, is the primary requirement in a Republican’s job description.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Oh yeah, they should do what the Republicans are doing and use a scorched earth, no compromise strategy! I mean, geez, look at all these huge legislative wins accomplished by this congress using this strategy. Maybe we can even have a cool purity-test driven speaker role, that’s been working well for them! Anything else we should imitate that I’m forgetting? A demagogic, unrestrained president would definitely tie things up nicely.

Okay I’ll stop being a sarcastic jerk now, but you get the point. This strategy from Republicans works wonders when it comes to obstructing and shutting things down, but you’re never going to build anything with it. It’s destructive at its core.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
53 points

The last time they had a majority (first mandate of Obama if I recall?) they tried to work with the Republicans in good faith and they got nowhere so fast that the public voted them out from dissatisfaction.

Correct me if I’m wrong, but that’s how I remember it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

It was a one person majority in the Senate that only lasted for a brief amount of time and was gone once healthcare reform ate up all of the time before Ted Kennedy died. They basically took what Mitt Romney had done at the state level and applied it federally, which is what Republicans claimed to want before they decided to call it Obamacare and pretend they didn’t help craft it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

The health care bill contained a series of things that are broadly popular when they were laid out individually. Package them together and call it “Obamacare” in the media and it was suddenly unpopular.

Tea Party astroturfing can’t be understated, either. The GOP grabbed back power at just the right time to be able to gerrymander districts and then keep them gerrymandered up until now. We’re only beginning to erode that back.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

Technically, during the Obama Admin the Democrats had a senate supermajority for I think less than 2 months. During that time no substantial bills hit the senate floor that I recall, but I remember they approved a bunch of USPS locations which seemed odd to me. Politics are crazy but they’re even weirder in retrospect.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Because you need 60 votes to do anything in the Senate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Only until the instant the Senate takes a simple majority vote to lower it to 50.

While the Senate has historically been a useful bulwark for pushing back against the creeping fascism of the GOP, it’s also a matter of fact that it is an antidemocratic institution that in the longer term we’re better off minimizing or eliminating. It’s the House of Lords and we do not need a House of Lords in the modern era.

Though I would like to see proper reapportionment in the House of Reps first, including adding significantly more members.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

While the Senate has historically been a useful bulwark for pushing back against the creeping fascism of the GOP

Has it?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

But muh states rights!

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Because corporate dems are basically republicans. Our whole political system is right of center. With a few outliers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I commented this a while back, and I believe it wholeheartedly -
The current U.S. system is set up so that only two political parties can exist. In a perfect world, they would be rational, and represent differing facets of the voters values/goals. But in addition to not having a perfect world, through manipulation, degradation of the laws, and just human error/unintended consequences, we’ve wound up with a system where the two parties in power are largely funded by corporations, or those who have the resources to create PACs and launder their money into politics, and those groups represent roughly the same values and political goals.

So the political ‘game’ now is to acquire money to campaign (so you can get the votes) by appeasing the donors while appearing to do things that attract voters, because voting has not quite been manipulated to the point where money equals votes, yet. (Save for gerrymandering, which renders the voting ‘problem’ moot.)

I now believe politics is largely theatrical, and the media, also controlled by the interests that fund the political campaigns of politicians that do their bidding, works very hard to keep folks divided and arguing, rather than facing the real problem of their systemic disempowerment.

I am increasingly disillusioned that a solution to this problem is possible.

But anyway - I guess I’m saying I agree with you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Have you ever listened to Democrats? The leadership keeps saying that they believe we need a strong Republican Party for some reason.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Imagine the soundbites if they said they wanted to destroy the opposition party.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

GOP talking heads say the same thing all the time

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The GOP had a sign that said “we are domestic terrorists.” Can we stop caring what these radicalized disruptors think? Anyone who claims to be a moderate at this point is not welcome in my house none the less would I want to be on the same side as them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They say this because their lobbyists want nothing to change and if the Republicans are too weak, Democrats may actually have to make peoples lives better or the whole charade falls apart.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

For better or worse we have a two dominant party system, which totally breaks down when one party decides to go it alone and only advance causes they can win with their votes.

That is a weak party, so divided internally they don’t dare compromise externally.

If we don’t have at LEAST two functional parties, it all falls apart.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That sounds like an utterly stupid system that is fragile and easily manipulated… Go figure it’s ours…

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

why would democrats ever want to negotiate with them

For the sheer joy of capitulation.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
111 points

The year is 2006 and Republicans are killing a compromise deal that they all admitted they actually liked.

The year is 2014 and Republicans are killing a compromise deal that they all admitted they actually liked.

The year is 2024 and the GOP is about to win in a landslide on the “Democrats never get anything done” platform, so I guess you can’t argue with their results.

permalink
report
reply
60 points

Idk if I believe that.

We’re about to see a lot of “unlikely voters” turning out…

And to think, running the same guy who tried to cling to power with a self coup after losing the last election in a landslide to the guy you lost to 4 years ago who’s supreme court justices “Roe is settled law” brought about headlines of suffering and skyrocketing teen pregnancy…

Anyway remember that foreign policy is about power, not morality. And if “both sides are the same” no, one side is corporate shills and the other are fascist sycophants.

Not voting for Biden or Not Voting is a vote for the Christian Caliphate where white is right but only if you’re a straight male. Everyone else can stay in the kitchen or go to the camps. History doesn’t repeat but it rhymes

permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points
*

deleted by creator

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

My uterus is downright furious. I’m so glad it can’t read or it might try arson.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Amen.

Never forget that Democrats were supposed to lose the midterms in a landslide and the economy was the top priority, supposedly. They barely lost the House but made gains in the Senate. And I think if you ask Republicans if they feel like winners in the House… Well, we can all see how that’s been going.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Hear hear!

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yo yo

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

We’re about to see a lot of “unlikely voters” turning out…

I’ll fucking believe that when I see it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-17 points

We’re about to see a lot of “unlikely voters” turning out…

If the primary and the off-cycle elections are any indication, we’re going to see a big downturn in participation - particularly among Biden’s left wing base - as enthusiasm for another four years of Republican Lite administration tanks out.

Anyway remember that foreign policy is about power, not morality.

Hitler Particles Detected

Not voting for Biden or Not Voting is a vote for the Christian Caliphate

Its not the votes that count, but who counts the votes. And in my home state of Texas, the Governor has already made moves to consolidate election authority in the governor’s mansion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points
*

If the primary and the off-cycle elections are any indication, we’re going to see a big downturn in participation - particularly among Biden’s left wing base - as enthusiasm for another four years of Republican Lite administration tanks out.

This 1000%. You can’t keep treating leftists as a bigger enemy than the Republicans and expect them to keep voting for you just so we move 2 inches right instead of 4.

EDIT: Look at all the democrats treating leftists as a bigger enemy than the Republicans. If leftists are the ones keeping you from winning, maybe it’s time to start moving your policy left instead of bullying them while you sprint right to court “centrists” that we all know will NEVER vote for a Democrat as long as they live.

A vote for Democrats isn’t a vote against fascism, it’s a vote for fascism in 4 years instead of now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

I dont think that will fly this time. It’s VERY obvious now that they can’t do ANYTHING in the house. Their ability to govern has been laid bare.

Meanwhile Biden managed to pass some of the most meaningful and useful legislation in decades with the previous congress. So even if Republicans do nothing, Biden’s done more than the last two presidents to move the needle.

Also, they got clowned hard. Biden admitted he’d shut down the border–which is what they were clamoring for him to do. Then they killed it. They dont care about the border and its obvious. This isn’t going to be laid at Dems feet.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

It’s VERY obvious now that they can’t do ANYTHING in the house.

But it is equally obvious that guys like Abbot and DeSantis have an open hand to act as they please on the border. That’s where this gets dangerous.

By bogging down the legislative process and allowing Biden to twiddle his thumbs in the White House, we have transferred enormous amounts of power to the border states with the most horrific people in charge. The GOP decision to kill the bill was calculated, as it accrued authority to their allies in the Southwest.

Also, they got clowned hard.

They got laughed at by the same group of jokers who were going to point and laugh at them regardless. Meanwhile, right-wing talk radio is spinning this as a victory for the Immigration Absolutists and a rallying cry for the Trump Presidential campaign.

Democrats have shown their hand on what they will concede. Republicans are in a strong position to advance their majorities in House and Senate into the next cycle. That puts the ball in their court, even if Mike Johnson personally looks like a weak Speaker. Republicans don’t care if he’s weak, because they’ve put all their chips on Trump anyway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

The year is 2024 and the GOP is about to win in a landslide on the “Democrats never get anything done” platform, so I guess you can’t argue with their results.

2018 is going to be a red wave

2020 is going to be a red wave

2022 is going to be a red wave

Surely 2024 will be a red wave!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You left out 2016, 2014, 2010, 2002, and 1994.

Surely 2024 will be a red wave!

The gains Dems have made in the Midwest are heavily predicated on minority voters (particularly Arab Americans) sticking with the party. And it looks like Biden’s getting ready to piss all that away.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

So, these elections are basically down to independent voters.

Not the leftists that hate both parties and say they’re independent voters

Not the libertarians that hate both parties and say they’re independent

But the actual independents, especially those in swing states - that vote for either opposing party - is what these elections come down to.

And weve already seen how they voted in the midterms, despite a shit economy.

If it’s Biden versus Trump, I’d wager it’s a Biden win

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I hate both parties and I say I’m independent, as I realize they are both beholden to their corporate interests and lobbyists.

The system isn’t designed for people with good ideas to emerge and change things for the better, but I like to think at some point in the future individuals like that could win outside of party lines. They have us all mixed up in these culture wars while the rich people keep on getting richer at an accelerated pace.

But you are right, I’m going to vote for my version of less crazy, along with everyone else, and we’ll collectively go nowhere until the current crop of politicians age out or die.

permalink
report
parent
reply
86 points

Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to throw this in every Trump voter’s face any time they mention the border or national security ever again. They’ll be back to know-nothing cockroach status again in 2025.

permalink
report
reply
32 points

Yeah, that’ll work about as well as reminding them about the Reagan tax cuts, Bush’s wars, and Trump’s fuckery ballooned the national debt that they’re always so “worried” about.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I’ve used similar pressure about Trump’s steel tariffs to shut chuds up about politics. It works.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Could you elaborate? I like to shut chuds up too but I no has smart.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I can tell you exactly what they’ll say, actually, “The Bill gave billions to Ukraine and Israel and 20 Million for border defence what a joke” and at that point you should remind them that they instead decided to give $0 to the border defence, delegitimized Abbot’s perimeter for drowning women and children, and the next time the GOP have power they still won’t do anything because they’ll have created another massive deficit like they always do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
79 points

Imagine overlooking the benefit to your citizens because you want your would be leader to do it instead.

And people still vote for these pieces of shit

permalink
report
reply
-13 points
*

We need to start labeling all politicians that go against the citizens enemies of the state. They should be allowed only a public defender. Life in prison or choice of beheading. Expedited charging of no more than 30 days. No last meals. We want cheap costs and swift resolutions, they fight against citizens they should be relieved of the rights awarded to citizens.

Edit: A lot of people here are anti the people and pro politicians going against what their representation represents. That cowardice is why the supreme Court will rule an insurrectionist can be president, and then they will be removed/killed if they try to say otherwise after. Tolerate fascism… We are doomed

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I feel like you didn’t think that all the way through before you wrote it

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yeah, perpetuate the cycle of dehumanizing violence! That’ll show them what’s what!

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Calm down there Saudi Arabia

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I know, right?

You have the 2nd amendment. “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”

Just shoot them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
71 points

If you’re ever arguing with a relative, remember that this is the most unproductive House of Representatives that we’ve ever had. Ever. They’re barely even working in there. Why? Because republicans are sitting on their hands for everything

permalink
report
reply
55 points

If talking to a relative remind them that the border patrol themselves supported this bill despite normally criticizing Biden.

That’s what will fluster them the most.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

Can’t argue with that! True, the cult is largely a lost-cause. But just like Thanksgiving dinners across the country, the loudmouth uncle often gets the floor and influences the bystanders. In that respect, always remember the target-audience are the fence-sitters listening in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

CBP, USBP, and ICE would have all benefited SO much from this bill.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 385K

    Comments