Here we go. Autonomous vehicles are now mowing down cyclists.

I hope that Waymo’s insurance is good!

7 points

The day I get hit by a driverless car while on my bike is the day I lose what little sanity I have left. That car better hope it hits me good, else it’s gonna get some heavy u-lock treatment.

permalink
report
reply
36 points
*

Can we get the hyperbole out of here? If OP had actually read (and understood) the article they would have seen it was one of those confluence of events that no one could see coming. As soon as the car detected the cyclist it hit the brakes and the cyclist had minor injuries.

Basically, this car didn’t mow anyone down and did exactly what it was designed to do and attempted not to hit anyone.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

As soon as the car detected the cyclist it hit the brakes and the cyclist had minor injuries.

Had you read (and understood) the article, you would have seen that police have no details about what caused the crash, so you’re basing your assessment entirely on what the company said happened.

They have a certain level of damage-control to contend with, so no doubt they won’t be admitting negligence.

I think the cyclist only walked away with minor injuries because of the low speed of the accident (the car was allegedly coming off a stop sign) and vehicle type. But I also think it should have it seen or anticipated the cyclist and stopped sooner, especially at such low speeds.

Unless, of course, the claim is that the cyclist hit the car, and not the other way around.

I guess we’ll know when Waymo hands over the ride footage. Hopefully, they comply and not withhold it like their competitor did.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

You need to be better. The article says there was a passenger in the car, I’m sure they can and will testify as to exactly what happened.

Again. This wasn’t a mowing down of anyone and it was a situation that even human drivers wouldn’t have been able to avoid.

I’m accepting that statement from waymo at face value until given reason not to. There are likely witnesses including the aforementioned passenger. Waymo is the one who called the cops. You need to take a breath and stop letting your hatred of vehicles larger than a bicycle color your take on things. It’s not healthy and it will lead to stress based health issues down the road.

The above said. You have a nice day now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

You need to be better. The article says there was a passenger in the car, I’m sure they can and will testify as to exactly what happened.

Do you think that the passenger would have been paying attention to what’s in front of the car? I don’t think so, but I would rather go by the cameras on the car - they don’t lie.

Again. This wasn’t a mowing down of anyone and it was a situation that even human drivers wouldn’t have been able to avoid.

I think they would have. At least human drivers that aren’t driving like self-driving cars 😜

You need to take a breath and stop letting your hatred of vehicles larger than a bicycle color your take on things. It’s not healthy and it will lead to stress based health issues down the road.

Fair point, and I appreciate your concern.

My daughter’s friend was killed by a driver in a pick-up truck less than a year ago while she was riding an e-scooter. It was 100% avoidable, and the driver was only charged with failure to yield.

No charges for actually killing her. So when I see that cars are still hurting or killing people, it boils my blood because I know that the driver (self-driving or not) will never be held accountable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m sure they were completely paying attention to what their car was doing like every time one of these things happen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Can’t wait until a guy that loses the ability to use their legs because they got demolished by a self driving cat has to defend themselves against corporate lawyers for daring to exist next to their infallible automated driving car.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

To be fair, the article is trash. There’s details in other publications, like Reuters:

"Waymo said its vehicle was at a complete stop at a four-way intersection when a large truck crossed the intersection in its direction. At its turn to proceed, the Waymo car moved forward.

However, the cyclist, who was obscured by the truck which the cyclist was following, took a left turn into the Waymo vehicle’s path. When the cyclist was fully visible, the Waymo’s vehicle braked heavily, but wasn’t able to avoid the collision, the company said."

Drafting through an intersection is not very safe (I really should stop doing it myself) because of this exact visibility problem. Heck, it seems our cyclist friend cut left because they couldn’t see the waymo car either.

Watch out when crossing busy intersections, folk! Cars are bulky and opaque. Yield when encountering busy intersections.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

This exactly. OP has their head so far up their ass about this they refuse to acknowledge that the cyclist was also culpable here.

I’m accepting what was said at face value as it sounds probable. It’s clear that OP did not actually understand the article and assuming they read it, they were already biased and can’t separate their personal feelings from the facts being presented.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

‘Waymo said’

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

Last year, or the year before, there was a murder in Iceland and it made national news. Why? Because there are virtually no murders in that country - it is an exception to the rule.

Mile-for-mile, self-driving cars fare significantly better than humans: who are actually the ones “mowing down people.” Especially the drunk ones. It’s exactly the same situation as Iceland with the murders, if you had national news each time a human caused a casualty there would be hardly enough time to tell the news.

The “mowing down” hyperbole is doing your cause no justice. I certainly agree that it’s too early to go completely driverless (especially when your trustworthy humans go hands/eyes-free in cars that explicitly disallow it) - but humans have never had the qualifications to deal with something that drives 10x the speed than they can sprint.

If you want to pull self-driving cars off the road then, great! I think we can all agree with that. Let’s pull all human drivers off the road first - not only do the statistics support that we’re incompet, biology does too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I hate the lane assist in our car, I had to shut it off. It kept steering the car back toward obstacles I was trying to avoid, like trucks with wide loads, potholes, and cyclists. I don’t know why anyone thinks that shit is a good idea. I’m sure driverless cars will make the same stupid mistakes.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

I’ve never had issues with it because it shuts off when indicating in the direction that you are turning.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I’m not indicating when I’m sliding to the left or right within the lane I’m already in…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Mine disconnects when I steer. Both my cars will just beep at you for actively steering across a line, though you do need to overpower the machine’s steering

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah that “machine’s steering” is what pisses me off (and got shut off).

I’ve been driving for decades. Hundreds of thousands of miles. Everything from small cars to pickups towing 30’ trailers, and motorhomes towing cars. I have ONE at-fault accident in my record during all that time (which likely wouldn’t have been helped by the nanny features). I do not need the help.

I’m not saying I’m perfect; I make mistakes, too. But the fucking false alarms and shit from the car is distracting. I almost hit the brakes the first time I got a false alarm, because I thought there was something seriously wrong with our new car. It’s training me to ignore the alarm, so when I actually do make a mistake it catches, I’ll probably just ignore it - making them useless.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Why TF are cars driving themselves around without people? Like the 1:1 ratio of cars to people wasn’t bad enough now we need to clog up the roads and pollute our air even more and for what?? Like literally for what?

permalink
report
reply
5 points

In this incident there was a passenger in the car. They were not injured.

The rolling taxis problem is still a thing though. I know there’s lots for these self-driving cars to hang out in, but even that means a return trip back to base is without passengers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Rule 1

permalink
report
reply

Bicycles

!bicycles@lemmy.ca

Create post

Welcome to !bicycles@lemmy.ca

A place to share our love of all things with two wheels and pedals. This is an inclusive, non-judgemental community. All types of cyclists are accepted here; whether you’re a commuter, a roadie, a MTB enthusiast, a fixie freak, a crusty xbiking hoarder, in the middle of an epic across-the-world bicycle tour, or any other type of cyclist!


Community Rules

  • No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.

  • Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.

  • No porn.

  • No ads / spamming.

  • Ride bikes


Other cycling-related communities

Community stats

  • 548

    Monthly active users

  • 257

    Posts

  • 2.6K

    Comments

Community moderators