• Elon Musk purchased shares of Twitter after unsuccessfully petitioning the CEO to remove a Twitter account tracking his private jet.
  • Musk’s personal gripes played a key role in his $44 billion acquisition of Twitter.
  • Musk banned the account after promising not to, highlighting his prioritization of getting his way over free speech.

Archive link: https://archive.ph/ttBv9

3 points

This is the best summary I could come up with:


A particular beef involving a college student tracking his private jet was the catalyst for the billionaire purchasing shares of Twitter, commencing his takeover of the social media platform, according to a new book about the ordeal.

“Musk had also unsuccessfully petitioned Agrawal [CEO of Twitter at the time] to remove a Twitter account that was tracking his private plane,” says an excerpt from Battle for the Bird, a new book on Musk’s takeover, published by Bloomberg on Thursday.

The book seems to confirm that Musk’s personal gripes played a key role in his $44 billion acquisition of the social media platform.

Musk touts “free speech” as the main reason he bought Twitter, but the billionaire was actively trying to silence a college student he had a feud with before he was CEO.

The person behind the account, Jack Sweeney, is a college student who’s now famous for tracking the private jets of Musk and Taylor Swift.

Musk was heavily focused on promoting right-wing speech when he bought Twitter, which was lacking under Jack Dorsey’s management, but also on settling his internet beef.


The original article contains 405 words, the summary contains 183 words. Saved 55%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

permalink
report
reply
37 points

What a snowflake

permalink
report
reply
1 point

A visionary snowflake.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

How is he visionary, exactly?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I mean, I didn’t think it needed an /s because does anyone take the term “visionary” seriously anymore?

permalink
report
parent
reply
372 points

Incidentally… https://mastodon.social/@elonjet is still going strong.

permalink
report
reply
179 points

Holy shit this dude fucking lives on his plane. Like I feel guilty about the 2-3x per year I fly to see family but this fucker has flown that far already in the past week. Why? Does he not know how to do a video call?

permalink
report
parent
reply
151 points

Ugh, I feel the same. I know the top 1% of the world or whatever emits tons and tons more CO2 per year than the other 99%, but I didn’t know it was this bad. That plane is flying multiple times per day. Sure Musk is probably not in it all the time, but that doesn’t matter.

Private jets should be banned all together, let’s see how quickly they suddenly find out the internet exists.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

And if only manufactures would make use of hydrogen turbojets.

permalink
report
parent
reply
77 points

Things like this are perfect reminders that we don’t have to change every person on the planet, just eliminate the erronneous emissions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

All air travel should have fuel and emissions tax. Normalize them to commercial airliners. That’ll incentivize larger, more efficient plane designs. It’ll also punish private jets. Also charge a fee for any planes not at least X% full. Also give discounts and waive fees for planes over X size that service under-served airports.

A bunch of regulations like this should make private planes prohibitively expensive, like 10-20x their current cost. But that’s a lot of legislation that huge corporations and billionaires would oppose.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

People with private jets often charter them out when they’re not using them. The best place for an airplane is in the air. Only bad things happen when you let it sit around on the ground all the time. It’s not much different than commercial planes that spend most of their time in the air.

Sure, a private jet will have more emissions than an Airbus, but it’s a marginal increase. It’s not like rich people with their planes are producing a million times more pollution that wouldn’t exist if they didn’t have a private jet. They’re still going to fly, at least for longer trips.

It’s easy to go down a rabbit hole with this line of reasoning. Who else is using less efficient aircraft or taking unnecessary flights? Are all those police helicopter flights necessary? What about people flying to go party on an island somewhere versus some more noble purpose? Or airlines with a half empty flight? Meanwhile, it’s the oil companies producing the vast majority of carbon emissions while we squabble over travel itineraries and choice of aircraft.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

You shouldn’t really feel guilty about anything like that. Asking hundreds of millions to billions of people to drastically change their lives and practice austerity is insane while billionaires do whatever they want and corporations push legislation that makes it harder to conserve. Our meager efforts won’t matter much if the biggest offenders go pollute wantonly.

Individual’s biggest efforts are pushing for legislation and politicians who will curb corporate abuses. Everything is a drop in a bucket that’s already overflowing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

There’s a limit to what is ethical when it comes to the acceptance of one’s own carbon footprint. It’s OK to use plastic bottles every now and then, but fuck flying 3 times a year. This is part of the problem, and something that we’ll need to learn to live without eventually.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

That’s why capitalism is inherently incompatible with stopping Climate Change and we’re all fucked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

This follows classic maritime law: You don’t have to pay taxes if you live in the air. That is what my lawyer Chareth Cutestory said. I have the best lawyers

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Others close to him use the jet as well, but I imagine it’s still heavily Elon

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Also, many of the flights are empty. The flight will be moved so it’s in position if needed, or it will drop him off and fly elsewhere.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

Dude takes a 22 minute flight. My god how small do you need to feel to boost your ego to do that instead of video.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

10 minute flight for nearly 1 ton of CO2 emissions 2 days ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Do your bosses (and their bosses) support work-from-home? They know how, but it’s about control for these people.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

If Musk saw this carbon would literally be shooting out of his ears like an old bugs bunny cartoon

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Does that also get posted to Threads or now Bluesky?

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points
*

The profile is “elonjet . net” (without the space) on bluesky.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Since Threads is federated, it should be accessible from there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Threads isn’t federated yet. It’ll be a while before fediverse accounts can be seen on threads

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

I don’t get this. What is the point? Why would anyone care where a billionaire is flying to and from? Just for kicks?

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

I think it’s mostly aboit the massive carbon footprint of a private jet and Elon has a rep for really short frequent flights.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

this is so astoundingly petty, it might just be true.

although i doubt that’s the only reason he bought it, i wouldn’t be surprised if it’s a major factor that got him serious about buying it.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

Information control

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Infrastructure control. Transportation, communications, banking, etc. He’s going after it all. I’ll never touch anything he’s even remotely involved in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

If that’s true, Saudi Arabia probably wouldn’t have given him $22B of their dollars with no expectation of a Return on Investment. They have no horse in the “does Elon look foolish?” race.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Its possible for them to have different interests. Its also possible for this to be the nucleation point that got things rolling without it really being the full cause.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Saudis? No interest in control over what was THE app to get world updates and news?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

And a key tool in the Arab Spring uprisings

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I didn’t say that. I said they have no horse in the “does Elon look foolish race”. My post is communicating that they very much have a horse in the “information control” race.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Twitter is really big in SA so their king wanting extra controll of it makes sense.

Butchering a reporter in Istanbul worked for them but the backlash was likely a bit of an embarrassment to these monsters.

Kashodi was murdered over countering SA bots. Easier to have a controlling interest in the platform than to fight dissidents with dirty assassin tricks. Allah forbid granting some freedom to the press.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 17K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 543K

    Comments