159 points

I hope this encourages children to learn an important life skill that will help them in numerous ways: Piracy.

permalink
report
reply
50 points

It’s honestly stupid. They just go to less moderated sites, or if you’re lucky, learn how to use a VPN and bypass all this nonsense anyway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It is life changing really. I don’t recall ever paying for digital content. I still go to the theatres for an exceptional movie but that’s it. It has made me learn more about computers, be a bit savvy in tech. I can’t count how many times that has helped me get through my job. It really is an important life skill

permalink
report
parent
reply
-81 points

You want children to watch porn?

permalink
report
parent
reply
69 points
*

I was looking at porn by 11ish, so sure. Imagine making people wait until 18 or 21.

Do you also have issue with them watching action movies with people dying?

permalink
report
parent
reply
60 points

People being decapitated = okay for kids!

Woman’s nipple = NOOOOOOOO!!!

permalink
report
parent
reply
49 points

I was beating my meat like a boxer with a speedbag to the Playboy magazines I found when I was 11. And that was well before the internet was available. Kids are gonna find something to whack/flick it to, get over it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Remember those mail-order catalogues? Specifically the women’s underwear section. Horny teenagers are going to find something. And they have a vivid imagination.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

lmao at boxer at a speedbag its so apt but still so fucking funny.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Kids will do that either way when they get to that age.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

I think he just meant that children are the most likely to uhhh, find a way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Oh the humanity. They might get deeply inaccurate ideas about the perks of pizza delivery.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

One should be vastly more worried about people who when they think of children think of porn, or vice-versa.

Normal people might think of children and think of playground safety or maybe how SUVs should be banned because they’re so much more dangerous for children on streets than normal cars.

People whose top concern when it comes to “children” is “porn” are emotionally invested in a certain kind of association that normal people don’t usually have in their minds in such strong terms.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Do you think this will stop them?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

I watched porn as a teen. Look, maybe in America you’re all puritans or whatever, but I started looking at magazines when I was 13 and then later found online porn (and hell I was LATE to the game according to my classmates). This is a reality y’all have to come to terms with. Teens watch porn.

permalink
report
parent
reply
97 points

Headlines next year: “VPN subscriptions in the UK up 42069% for some reason”

permalink
report
reply
44 points

As a quote in the article states, porn is the canary in the coal mine - with some MPs apparently advocating for blocking VPNs to prevent work arounds.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Tell me the MPs don’t understand VPN technology without telling me the MPs don’t understand VPN technology.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Why listen to experts who can explain all this technology when I get it from Facebook!

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

probably also haters of wfh.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

How are they going to block VPNs?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Block ports associated with popular protocols is one method.

In terms of blocking VPNs reliably? Not much you can do afaik, you can even do VPN over websockets.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

Followed by headline: “Torries Criminalize VPN Use, Require Use of Torrie-Owned VPN”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

The fuck is a Torrie?

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Conserva-tory

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

An authoritarian wanker

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

The plural of Tory with an extra R.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

British Conservatives.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I truly appreciate the number you used. Chef’s kiss

permalink
report
parent
reply
81 points

I mean, the government could tackle homelessness, or end child hunger, many appropriate subjects. But instead they want to regulate jerk-off material. Sad.

permalink
report
reply
23 points

They are way more concerned with genitals than they should be.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Our genitals at that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

its always nice that they want your official id associated with your porn. i just want to see what happens when that database gets hacked.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Steve Shives?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

you got me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

This might be a big nitpick, but “Child Protection Groups”, vs “Privacy Warriors”, sounds sleazy.

As positive connotations as possible on one side, vaguely negative on the other.

permalink
report
reply
23 points

Didn’t you know? The right to privacy somehow only protects adults and not children.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

To conservatives, children don’t have rights. You protect them like you would protect property, by putting it under lock and key.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Yes, they see them as property to be used.

But even in that stupid, dehumanizing framework it still ought to be one of the issues of “parents rights” they love so much. Your child’s privacy being violated is a violation of your property rights. YOU didn’t consent to that child’s privacy being compromised, and they are a thing that belongs to you and can only exist according to your beliefs and rules, so that was an attack on you.

So the real truth is that to conservatives, there is no coherent ethical framework they can turn to to reliably make judgements. It is the politics of being a cruel and obstinate asshole.

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 9.3K

    Monthly active users

  • 18K

    Posts

  • 294K

    Comments