71 points

Considering that business was basically run by his children for a while it’s extremely disappointing to see them excluded from the judgement.

permalink
report
reply
69 points

Both boys have to pay $4m and can’t run NY businesses for 3 years. Not nothing - although I did not see anything about Ivanka.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

They’re also “jointly and severally liable” for the major amounts of cash, I have no idea what that means though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

It means they can pay jointly, but each is liable for the whole amount.

As in, if Trump claims to be broke, either son could be forced to pay whatever is outstanding, they can’t limit their liability to one third.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Ah, I should read better - thanks!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Ivanka a defendant, she testified but that’s it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
66 points

One, the kids are also barred for a period of time.

Two, the big kicker is:

He also continued “the appointment of an Independent Monitor” and ordered “the installation of an Independent Director of Compliance” for the company

There is going to be eyes and ears on everything Trump attempts to do to weasel money around, especially given how often Trump shifts funds illegally to maintain his grift. That monitor is absolutely going to be dragging Trump back into court sooner or later. The man knows no restraint, he’s absolutely going to FAFO.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points
43 points

And if he doesn’t pay the fine he goes to jail, right?

… he goes to jail, right?

permalink
report
reply
22 points

No. They start seizing his bank and brokerage accounts, put liens on his properties, etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

In a just world, we’d all get to see the iconic news footage of the 20s: Trump being evicted from Mar a Lago as it is being seized.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

He might get away by knocking on supreme court’s door as the panel is conservative and trump elected them but who knows

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Is that likely for a state civil case?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yes

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

Only a 3 year ban… interesting.

permalink
report
reply
34 points

Might still be a lifetime ban… you never know…

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Don’t get my hopes up like that

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

In 3 years we will may know

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

At 79 or whatever 3 years is an eternity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yet it goes by in a blink of the eye.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

I see a lot of people talking about 3 years being relatively short. The point is not about keeping Trump out, it’s about putting the independent CEO in. 3 years is a long time for an independent CEO to dismantle the company and fix a ton of shady stuff.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Lifetime will only be handed down if you’re poor.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

IDK anything about this particular case but tougher penalties are often easier to appeal.

3 years is tantamount to a lifetime in trumps case. Not so his sons but whatever.

permalink
report
parent
reply
31 points

$354 million here…
$83.3 million to E. Jean Carroll
$5 million on the first E. Jean Carroll case…

So $442,300,000 - Yow!

permalink
report
reply
19 points

It might be closer to 450 then 354 due to interest https://mastodon.social/@GottaLaff/111943052849383387

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Hope long will it be tied up in appeals, 3 years?

permalink
report
reply
53 points

In New York State you have to front 110% of the money before you can appeal. So he would have to front $390M just to file the appeal.

His whole 2016 campaign raised $330M for context.

He’s also on record under oath saying he has $400M cash on hand meaning if he doesn’t actually have the cash on hand he perjured himself as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points
*

He would likely do this by buying a bond. It would be substantial though, and even if he won the appeal the bond would like cost like $35 million or something he would never get back, and he needs to pay that before the appeal. It’s all money being sapped away from the republican party at least.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

He would likely do this by buying a bond.

In the $5 million E. Jean Carroll case, Trump paid the $5 million in cash on appeal. He claimed it was to avoid the fees of buying a bond but some have argued that no bond lenders would agree to lend to Trump due to the risk of not being paid back. If that’s the case, Trump is going to be fronting a lot of cash in a short amount of time. Even a billionaire doesn’t want $400 million tied up in escrow accounts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

He can just get a loan from Saudi Arabia. $400 million ain’t shit to MBS.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

He’s barred from using any banks or other financial institutions registered in New York to do it, which includes pretty much all banks operating in USA which may have enough funds available to issue it. So if he doesn’t have the cash on hand then he absolutely need to start begging private financiers to help him

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

A while, I’m sure. The thing is, to appeal a ruling you have to be able to show that some part of the process wasn’t within the letter of the law. Trying to appeal will certainly buy some time, but not much if the attempt is unsuccessful. Given the wealth of evidence against the organization, I wouldn’t think the appeal will be successful.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

And he has to pony up the $ or collateral now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

This will ultimately be what does him in. He can play legal games for years with ease, but the moment he’s forced to pony up actual hard cash his house of cards will collapse. Best case scenario for him right now is that he can dip into the GOP’s finances to pay this fine, although if he does so that’s opening up yet another can of worms that’s likely to come back and bite him. No bank is going to loan him money, and his supporters collectively don’t have enough cash to cover that fee even if he could convince them to send him even more money.

Any more judgements like this one and he’s going to have to start seriously liquidating assets and with how leveraged most of them probably are even that’s going to net him a lot less actual cash than it might seem like. There’s a reason he grifts so hard and it’s not because he’s so amazingly successful.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Jean Carrol case he needs to put down the money to appeal, is it not the same here?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

He can technically appeal anyway, but he has very limited options.

If he pays in 30 days and appeals AND if the appeals court hears the case, then the money will be held by the court and then he can request that they stay the judgment, AND if they agree money is returned (but he can still lose and have to pay again).

If it goes to appeals and they don’t stay judgement then if he wins it also gets paid back. Or if he loses then the government claims it, of course.

If he don’t pay in 30 days then the government can start seizing assets and auction them off EVEN IF he appeals, which absolutely would be horrible for him. If he won on appeal after that he’d get compensated for it, but not without collateral damage due to his complete lack of control over what assets to keep or sell.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 10K

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 483K

    Comments