cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/12134129

Cummins Diesel Cheats Emissions Tests - Fined $1.6B by US

74 points

Corporations have no shame. From the article:

Cummins says it will continue collaborating with investigators to lower the environmental red flag.

If your neighbor got caught stealing mail, then solemnly declared he’d continue working with the police to reduce theft in the neighborhood, you’d punch him across the face.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

I do agree. Unfortunately most manufacturers of diesel engines aren’t stoked about environmental regulations and plenty have stopped trying all together.

Currently their plan is to just throw more urea at the exhaust.

I remember them having to bypass the DEF system on a lot of vehicles because they didn’t make enough spare parts of the system they put in. So I’m sure they knew either face public backlash or get fined by the government. It was probably a calculation where the 2b was on the cheaper side from them. I’m sure they made enough money that they don’t feel the need to fight it.

Once again, not an endorsement. I’m sure every diesel engine manufacturer is/will/was doing the same thing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Seems like the plan right now is similar to Amazon and SpaceXs bet with the NLRB: throw up roadblocks, don’t cooperate, bet on Trump. It’s truly sad to watch.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

$1.6 Billion is a lot for cummins. I’ve got a massage parlor down the road that’ll do it for $50.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

The best part of cheap laughs is that I can get so many, well done.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
36 points
*

Whoa, a 10-figure fine *for a giant corporation!? About time they made that shit hurt!

permalink
report
reply
38 points

Then you’ll love to hear how VW paid a $2.8 billion fine (in 2017) when they were caught doing the same thing!

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

VW probably had way more cars involved though, so the cost per car was lower.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

I wouldnt underestimate how many cummins engines there are, lots of trucks, tractors and other large machines use them, some of which run constantly. If anything i would say they got off lighter than VW

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

VW also has a revenue that’s almost 10x as much as Cummins. It’s a “cost of doing business” write off for both of them, but a more expensive one for Cummins comparatively

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

And VW cratered due to consumer backlash. For Cummins, this is a marketing opportunity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

That was just one of the many cases. In total, dieselgate cost VW $38 billion. On top of that, a lot of their executives ended up in prison.

Unfortunately, every other automaker (well, except Tesla for fairly obvious reasons) did the same thing, some worse than VW, and barely got any punishment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

From reading the article, it was approximately 1 million vehicles in violation, all pickup trucks. That works out to $1,600 per vehicle.

Don’t take this the wrong way—the fine is large, but $1,600 on vehicles that sell for fifty times that still seems… thin.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

This is Cummings, they make the engines, not the truck. I have no clue what they charge car companies for their engines but I know it is a lot closer to $1,600 than the cost of the completed truck.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

You can buy a Cummins crate engine for $10,000. Assuming that’s a large markup compared to the negotiated amount I’m sure the vehicle manufacturers got, I would bet they’re being fined around 20 percent of what they made off of selling the engines to manufacturers.

Probably not enough to kill the company, but definitely enough to make them think twice on doing it again (almost like what fines should be….).

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Here’s some more info from the Justice Department release: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/statement-attorney-general-merrick-garland-agreement-principle-cummins-settle-alleged

The company allegedly installed defeat devices on 630,000 model year 2013 to 2019 RAM 2500 and 3500 pickup truck engines. The company also allegedly installed undisclosed auxiliary emission control devices on 330,000 model year 2019 to 2023 RAM 2500 and 3500 pickup truck engines.

Which makes this quote in OP’s article even more infuriating:

“The company has seen no evidence that anyone acted in bad faith and does not admit wrongdoing,” Cummins External Communications Director Jon Mills told Forbes.

Installing a cheat device is the definition of acting in bad faith!!!

permalink
report
reply
5 points

I’m genuinely curious how they’re pulling this off. Is it called something entirely innocent internally? Like “emissions controller” or something?

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Probably similar to what VW did. Just had a small group of people know about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

So they are even worse than they officially were?

permalink
report
reply

A Boring Dystopia

!aboringdystopia@lemmy.world

Create post

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

–Be a Decent Human Being

–Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

–Posts must have something to do with the topic

–Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

–No NSFW content

–Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

Community stats

  • 6.6K

    Monthly active users

  • 805

    Posts

  • 26K

    Comments

Community moderators