126 points

I saw this on twitter and it was really funny/bizarre to see how many blue check marks were going “wow… hope this MR OLIVER enjoys going to jail for BRIBERY” and like, making threats of ‘reporting him’, quoting legal statutes.

It’s just so goofy, like comically dumb. Aside from “obviously a joke” points, who are the big Clarence Thomas defenders??? Do people really just make their opinions based on “well, liberals don’t like him… which means he must be good!!”

permalink
report
reply
125 points

Half of the schtick John Oliver is making is pointing out the absurdity of his offer being legal. The fact that people are reporting him just shows how they think there should be laws against paying off a Supreme Court judge, which is the exact point being made in the segment.

permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points

It’s totally legal. He’s not offering to pay Thomas to change his rulings or rule in his favor. It’s so he resigns. Closer to an early retirement offer.

If the highest court in the land can be paid to go away, they shouldn’t have been justices because they were in it for the money. It also says damning things about our society and how money can trump extreme satisfaction at your job.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

Pretty sure it’s a bog standard job offer. No, you can’t keep your current job, sorry. No over employment here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
72 points

Do people really just make their opinions based on “well, liberals don’t like him… which means he must be good!!”

That’s exactly what those muppets do

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Yeah, I have literally had people tell me they didn’t like someone they voted for, but they really piss off the liberals.

permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points

It’s not illegal, though. That was a big part of the whole offer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

I don’t know man, a bunch of dipshits on Twitter are probably just as good as the lawyers John Oliver checked with.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yeah, if influencing a judge on the bench isn’t illegal, how would influencing one off of it be?

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

So… John would be bribing Thomas to NOT be a supreme court justice…? What… what do they imagine the penalty for that would be?

I get that most of these people aren’t rational, but I’m struggling to even imagine what the mental gymnastics on this look like. Is there some penalty for bribing someone who is not a public official?

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

Plus it’s not even a bribe. It’s a not-job offer at best.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

A retirement offer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Yes that is what people base their opinions on.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Checkout the conservative comm on Lemm.ee
Heads in the sand.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

No thank you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

You’re a smarter man than I am

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
66 points

Look, I’m just glad HBO let’s it happen. Fucking Apple got their panties in a knot when Stewart just said words.

permalink
report
reply
28 points

This is a topic that Apple probably wouldn’t have cared about. Stewart had a lot of episodes about terrible people in American government.

The rumored problem with The Problem is that he wanted to start tackling topics like China and AI. In the China example, Apple was probably terrified that China would do what they’ve done to every other media company that talk shit about the CCP. China halts sales of their products.

All in all, it’s not the words, it’s the money. It’s always about the money at the end of the day.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

In the end, Stewart at least assumed that Apple knew what his messaging was, how hard he would work to send that message and how many zero fucks he gives.

In the end, Apple tucked tail and hid behind dollars and made it obvious.

At least HBO gives this vibe of, yes, he wastes our money to create large animatronic eagles, but wedges in building websites to absolutely fuck with people to get his message across. Oliver has never mentioned HBO saying no to him.

I am also in no way defending HBO. They have done some gross stuff, too. This is simply an Apple vs. HBO argument.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

This is not HBOs money, it’s actually his

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yup. Fuck Apple. Fuck Blizzard… Man, there’s a list now… Whose keeping track? Please post it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

Embracer Group.

Black Rock.

Goldman Sachs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Let’s make it difficult. Companies you LOVE but hate what they have done: Trader Joes Nintendo My favorite hot chocolate mixer with a “brand” name that has a cute website and social media and everything<-wholly owned by Nestle which is not mentioned anywhere in the label.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

There are two iron rules to English grammar, and your comment is in contravention of them both.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I think we should give this one a pass. Remember the last one we talked about? Strung them up by their dangling participles and gave them a run on their run-on sentences.

permalink
report
parent
reply
48 points
*

I’d totally be willing chip in $20/month for the next 10 years.

permalink
report
reply
61 points

Sally Struthers on the verge of tears: For less than the price of a cup of coffee each week, you can help remove a corrupt Supreme Court Justice and bring hope to millions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’d triple that. I’d eat Ramen twice a day to afford it but God dammit I’d do it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Sometimes I think the world is full of people who would be worth bribing to go away. For example, businesses that save 3¢ per unit of some food product by using unsafe ingredients. If only we could just pay them 3¢ per unit not to do that!

I realize it feels awful to pay off evil people and it would incentivize even more bad behavior, but I’m just shocked at how much damage people are willing to do for so little benefit to themselves.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points
*

In case anyone wants to watch the video, like I do on Monday mornings, turns out HBO is now posting them on youtube on Thursdays so as to “drive up viewership” on Max.

permalink
report
reply
6 points

To the high seas it is then!

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

They just told you that is free on YouTube 😂 no need for the high seas. Well some AdBlock might advised.

EDIT: That said… all I could see is older videos… so maybe either is region locked and that’s why I don see them, not from the US, or I misunderstood something from Op.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The latter I think, it’s not online because it isn’t Thursday yet :)

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Plus it’s not the full ep on yt, just the main segment

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

It’s also quite funny.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Will his handler/s allow that?

permalink
report
reply
32 points
*

Nope. They need an amoral chode in place to defend white/christian nationalism.

Which is vaguely ironic considering.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

After Roe v. Wade was overturned, there was a lot of speculation Loving V. Virgina would be on the chopping block next. I’d argue that’s a strong contender for Irony, wouldn’t you agree?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

so, part of why Harlan Crow (Nazis, white supremacist rich fuck) and Clarence Thomas make less-strange bedfellows is because Clarence Thomas is/was a black supremacist. Basically they make the same arguments while playing for a different team.

That Thomas was a black guy willing to fuck over civil rights made him a very useful tool to white supremacists.

Loving V. Virginia is… offensive to black assholes, too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I started reading the link and thought “wow, what are the chances they had the same last name… Wait…”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 388K

    Comments