This may seem kinda ironic to be posting about, but when I say offline, I don’t mean strictly physical (like print books), so much as stuff that still works even when internet’s disrupted or whatever.

This may be a tell of my age in some respects, but I still enjoy downloading music, games, ebooks, or (more rarely) movies that simply work without phoning home or updating super often. There’s a weird sort of relief that I have both physical & digital fallbacks for when there’s a “storm in the clouds” so to speak.

One piece of media I’ve been meaning to look into to help in this space are maps. Maps are tricky given that they’re living documents, but I’d love to get a good downloadable/print map for reference.

Btw little protip if you’re on Android, check out Aard2 and downloadable dictionaries. They’re remarkably small, and it’s so much better than the ad-littered dictionary sites/apps, and even supports multiple languages.

2 points

If you find a decent offline map program for Linux, be sure to let me know. This seems like something that could be useful.

permalink
report
reply
3 points
*

Not linux, but an interesting mobile solution. Can probably port the android version to linux https://github.com/organicmaps/organicmaps. Found another for desktop/linux, but no routing features: https://github.com/heldersepu/GMapCatcher

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I held on for awhile, keeping collections of various kinds of things. Eventually I stopped and transitioned to steaming services for the convenience, and have subtly regretted it ever since.

You just have such a less personal relationship with the media, it really serves to cheapen it a little bit.

permalink
report
reply
3 points

Same. I used to have everything on my own computer or physically but was limited by hard drive space so I moved to Tidal.

I listen to music with much less intentionality when using tidal compared to my own music player so I’m currently questioning streaming services.

Less is more. I can buy less music, but I listen to it better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Less is more. I can buy less music, but I listen to it better.

This is me having listened to some of the same few albums for several years now. I only just realized as Janelle Monae is releasing a new album that I’ve been repeatedly listening to songs from her last album ever since and yet it still feels so damn fresh. So it’s not even that I’m not keeping up with current music, I just tend to savor it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah, a future where things are less online or hybrid models are my interest too. I have an insecurity about change for simple things such as maps for instance. Having an offline variant just helps in making sure my day is consistent if there’s no time to try new things/updates that changes the whole UX im used too.

permalink
report
reply
5 points

Would stuff that’s locally hosted count? You can actually download the entirety of Wikipedia and fit it into 22GB, which is well within the capabilities of an common SD card.

Maps are a bigger thing. Google has apparently collected about 20PB (20 million gigabytes) of data for maps, though I’d imagine if you just need street/address/road data that might be a significantly smaller subset. Just the satellite imagery of Google Earth is about 196TB. Not sure what just the basics would take up

permalink
report
reply
2 points
*

I’d count locally hosted stuff, yeah. I have a Jellyfin server in my local network that I use as a fallback for if internet goes down or a streaming service is having some issue. The latter is admittedly rare, but the former, unfortunately not so much.

Regarding maps, this is why I also mentioned print maps. It can get dense if you go hyper-detailed and digital, like you mention, but we’ve also had less detailed yet still pretty useful print atlases in the past…I just haven’t taken the time to look up what some good ones might be to pick up, in case I ever just find myself in a weird situation without signal for mobile data or something. Or for some locales that they just couldn’t get a Google car down or whatever.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Yeah paper maps work, I was just thinking of a way one can acquire updated maps on a regular basis without needing petabytes of storage :-)

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

OpenStreetMap has some pretty good offline maps. You can download them region by region so you don’t need the whole world at once.

permalink
report
reply

General Discussion

!general@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to Lemmy.World General!

This is a community for general discussion where you can get your bearings in the fediverse. Discuss topics & ask questions that don’t seem to fit in any other community, or don’t have an active community yet.


🪆 About Lemmy World

🧭 Finding Communities

Feel free to ask here or over in: !lemmy411@lemmy.ca!

Also keep an eye on:

For more involved tools to find communities to join: check out Lemmyverse!


💬 Additional Discussion Focused Communities:

Rules

Remember, Lemmy World rules also apply here.
  1. See: Rules for Users.
  2. No bigotry: including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  3. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  4. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with ‘silly’ questions. The world won’t be made better by dismissive comments to others on Lemmy.
  5. Link posts should include some context/opinion in the body text when the title is unaltered, or be titled to encourage discussion.
  6. Posts concerning other instances’ activity/decisions are better suited to !fediverse@lemmy.world or !lemmydrama@lemmy.world communities.
  7. No Ads/Spamming.
  8. No NSFW content.

Community stats

  • 858

    Monthly active users

  • 478

    Posts

  • 8.9K

    Comments