I want to donate to a linux phone. I believe in linux and I want a linux phone. Maybe we can use one in very few years as a normal daily driver. It’s getting closer and closer every month.

I want to donate that we get there sooner. But which project? I’m following postmarket but I’m not sure if they are the most promising. What’s your stance on this? To which project would you give your money to accellerate it?

Edit: I don’t want to buy a phone. I want to support the phone os devs. Sorry for the bad wording.

47 points

Tbh GrapheneOS.

Android is Linux.

And unlike desktop Linux it was able to spread secure and private standards

  • every app is sandboxed, not some opt-in like Flatpak
  • apps start with no permissions (or at least very little), everything is opt-in
  • it is like 99% unbreaking, immutable, it just always works while my desktop Linux broke all the time
  • there is a webview, which can be hardened. Not Electron, which is insecure and bloated
  • energy saving etc work like a charm. 1% battery loss over an entire night!
  • hardware security with trusted element is decades ahead of desktop Linux (Ubuntu is just now getting TPM encryption support)
  • it is a unified platform, with tons of apps, many of them essential (as the platform is so secure), like 2FA, Banking, public services etc. you can have a full FOSS phone though

I am sure excited for other operating systems but they are just toys. GrapheneOS does amazing work that is a 100% alternative today, for real phones with normal prices, good performance and outstanding security.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Android is Linux.

This should be repeated in every “Linux phone” thread.

It’s also possible to install a full GNU userland using Termux, and nowadays a graphical interface is even possible with Termux.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It is repeated in every single damn “Linux phone” thread, and in every single thread an answer like this is needed: No, it fucking isn’t. You know exactly what everyone means, stop being a dick about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

It is repeated in every single damn “Linux phone” thread

Good. The more people pushing back against falsehoods, the better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Almost everything you said here is false, with the exception of controversy over the developer. However, GrapeheneOS is far from a single developer project, and the former lead stepped down a little while ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

harassing and witch hunting any critics

You can criticize GrapheneOS just because Micay will care about your words. But you can’t do with something like OpenBSD because the developers are much knowledgeable and they never cared your words. They maintain an operating system for themselves and will not develop features to please users.

You can only criticize some small project with a developer that isn’t good in communication. You are truly a petty person.

having a little social media army with sockpuppets to do this

No loser, the community is the army. (their quality isn’t better than any Calyx or Lineage). The developers don’t even have enough time to please user with a beautiful user interface then why they would screaming on social medias like you are doing.

But they maintained hardened_malloc and you never take a word for it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
39 points

When i think of Android i don’t think of it as part of the gnu/linux ecosystem, but a heavily modified linux kernel turned against the user.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

How is it turned against the user? Androids Linux is highly restricted in that it doesnt support a lot of things, but that makes it extremely stable, while this doesnt mean that apps are also “stable” like in Debian

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

They don’t expect users to do development on android.

(Phones should be used like telephones lol.) I’m going to buy a landline phone

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

On GrapheneOS right now typing this, love it! I switched over about 2 years ago to Graphene and never looked back. Rarely have any issues, solid battery life, all my apps work, life is good and private.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

Android is Linux.

It runs Linux but it isn’t a “Linux phone” in the sense used here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Yes I know but the Term is simply incorrect. I dont have a better one though.

And even though I am excited to use some Linux Distro on a phone I own, it will be way worse in stability, security and crucial app support than Android / GrapheneOS.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

the Term is simply incorrect

LOL

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

I dont have a better one though.

I just say non-Android Linux systems. GNU/Linux if I’m talking about that type of system, but there are some like postmarketOS that are strictly not in that group (it’s based on Alpine)

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points
*

how are you only getting 1% battery drain overnight? my pixel 7 w grapheneos drains 10% overnight and battery saver makes it worse somehow

I would like to know your secrets

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

6a is good. The 7 is said to be bad.

permalink
report
parent
reply

The 6 series was when google introduced the tensor which is where the stereotype for worse battery life, worse performance, and less efficient radio come from.

I have a 6a too and for the price it’s fine, and I think a lot of the battery concerns are overblown, and for a budget phone competing with other budget phone devices tensor was great. That said the things that would make the tensor in the 7 bad are as present in if not more so in the 6a.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I have a 6a, which I tolerate for GrapheneOS. The battery life is absolutely terrible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

Being pixel only makes me cry

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Me too man, me too

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

What phone are you getting 1% over night on with Graphene?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

6a, nor now the last non EOL device that is tolerable I guess

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

5a was the last one with a headphone jack 😑

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’m getting less than 1% battery loss over night. But I have the unihertz tank and it has a 22000mAh battery.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
2 points

Linux phones are not going to be daily driver worthy in a long time.

My friend’s daily driver is a PinePhone. So daily driver worthy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

None of my PinePhone owning friends say it’s “quite there yet” to be a daily driver. I have been asking them every six months if it’s time to take the plunge.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

To people down voting you, it’s important to note that Google-free, pure FOSS Android based OS do exist.

This is what you should be looking at if you want a fully Open Source phone OS, with no privacy issues (no phoning to Google servers).

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

if you want a fully Open Source phone OS

That’s not the topic of OP’s post.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

Don’t do this.

Android is already Linux on a phone and it’s bad.

Donate to normal Linux on computers. There is an ever expanding mess of packages that need to be updated, fixed, hosted, maintained, streamlined, back ported and generally massaged into functionality with whatever goofy distro you pick.

Donate to Linux on computers instead.

permalink
report
reply
15 points

For the vast majority of people these days, a phone/tablet is their computer, and a laptop/desktop cannot fulfill the same use cases. So if someone makes the very reasonable request for a phone recommendation, telling them to just use a laptop/desktop doesn’t make any sense. It would be like someone asking for a recommendation for a moped, and responding “don’t bother, just get a Ford F150”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

No, it’s not like that at all.

The op didn’t ask for a phone recommendation and I didn’t recommend instead that they use a laptop or desktop.

The op said they want to donate to a Linux phone because one day they believe they’ll be able to use a Linux phone. They want to pick the right one to give money to so it’ll have the best effect towards that end.

I said they shouldn’t do that because they can already use a Linux phone and there are tons of other Linux based projects where the money will go much farther.

We ought to be looking at this from a completely different perspective though: op is trying to maximize the value their donation has, and that’s a bummer. They should just donate to the one they like and not worry about effectiveness.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Apologies if I misunderstood your meaning when you said “android is already Linux on a phone and it’s bad”. If android is sufficient for your mobile Linux needs, that’s fine, I use it too. But it doesn’t fit the bill for everyone, and that’s the point of OP wanting to support an actual FOSS mobile effort. The alternatives you list don’t get them closer to what they’re looking for.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s not clear to me why you believe Linux on mobile implies typing into a CLI interface using a phone keyboard. We choose to use the CLI when it makes the most sense as an input method for the platform, not because it’s required by Linux.

As the post above pointed out, android is already Linux, so that’s already an option. But OP’s goal would be to have a FOSS phone given that phones are increasingly the computing device of choice for people, and there are very few feature complete FOSS options in that space right now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

The point of Linux on phones isn’t to have a phone that requires you to constantly fix it with CLI tools. The point is to have a free and open software platform for a device that is increasingly necessary for daily life.

As a side effect, developing Linux for phones would probably help us eliminate the need to reach for the terminal on desktop Linux as well. I believe snaps (which laid the groundwork for flatpaks) were originally developed for Linux on “smart” devices. The whole ecosystem improves when we try to bring Linux into a new domain.

P.S. I use termux (a terminal for android complete with its own tiny Linux environment) from time to time when I need to access my server over SSH. It’s a bit clumsy, but super handy!

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

All smart phones are *NIX, i don’t even think the Windows phones were really Windows. Pick whichever UI you like best.

permalink
report
reply
-14 points

Apple Vision Pro

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Lol, well *I* thought it was funny:-P. You might get fewer fake internet point reductions if you threw in a /s.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Linux

!linux@lemmy.ml

Create post

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word “Linux” in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

  • Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
  • No misinformation
  • No NSFW content
  • No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

Community stats

  • 7.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 7.2K

    Posts

  • 192K

    Comments