13 points

Paywall

permalink
report
reply
24 points
*

We may never know what Euroclear, which holds 191bn of 260bn in frozen Russian assets, thinks is wrong with using those assets to backstop Ukranian debts.

Can you imagine the damage to Euroclear’s reputation? Think of what would happen if, every time some government declared war on another, the global community froze those assets and gave them to the victim. My god, what an alarming precedent. Think what would happen to the market if those frozen assets started to move again. What would the Kremlin have to say if those assets, frozen in response to aggression, were given to the victim of that aggression? Cats and dogs living together, total anarchy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*

The problem with giving away the assets, and I’m just parroting Simon Whistler here, is that they have never been used this way while in war time. This would be essentially funding one side’s war machine and could come back to bite western countries if they opt to overthrow a bad actor in the future.

For example, what if Bashar Al-Assad decides on the heavy use of chlorine gas on the majority Sunni in his country. The West opts to overthrow. The West are then the aggressors. Does Euroclear then freeze US assets and give them to Assad according to the precedent set by Russia v Ukraine?

The judiciary likes to follow precedent and consistency, it fairs less well when there is nuance and subject to interpretation. From a geopolitical standpoint, do we really want the judiciary determining who the good guys and the bad guys are?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The West are then the aggressors. Does Euroclear then freeze US assets and give them to Assad according to the precedent set by Russia v Ukraine?

For the love of christ PLEASE hold us accountable, SOMEBODY.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

No sure if your statement is sarcastic:) It reads like it? But yes it would be a good precedent - invade and lose your foreign assets.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

I absolutely refuse to use the /s tag. I tend to try to lay it on pretty thick, because specifying that you’re being sarcastic tends to ruin the comedic emphasis the sarcasm is intended to provide.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

If they try to pull this then western financial dominance is as good as dead.

permalink
report
reply

That’s why I want it to happen.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Another straw on the back of the collapsing western financial and monetary system. We’ll be glad to see it die.

permalink
report
reply
-4 points

Bitcoin will fill the power vacuum

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

No

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

What do you think is going to happen?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Let them do it, use the frozen Russian assets. I’m sure Russia knows that they won’t be seeing that money again.

Let the western financial system finally fucking collapse.

permalink
report
reply
-2 points

I know nothing about Euroclear or whose governmental auspices they operate under, but I would say this:

nationalize their asses if they don’t like it.

permalink
report
reply
-2 points

Belgian… they will wine and squeel, take it to court. And then be forced to fork over the cash plus interest.

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!worldnews@lemmy.ml

Create post

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Community stats

  • 5.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 9.9K

    Posts

  • 113K

    Comments