Donald Trump’s lawyers asked a New York judge Friday to suspend an $83.3 million defamation verdict against the former president, saying there was a “strong probability” that it would be reduced on appeal, if not eliminated.

The lawyers made the request in Manhattan federal court, where a civil jury in late January awarded the sum to advice columnist E. Jean Carroll after a five-day trial that focused only on damages. A judge had ordered the jury to accept the findings of another jury that last year concluded Trump sexually abused Carroll in 1996 and defamed her in 2022.

The second jury focused only on statements Trump made in 2019 while he was president in a case long delayed by appeals.

100 points

Increase it.

permalink
report
reply
40 points

Motherfucker was defaming her again just last week at a rally in Michigan. 83m was obviously not punitive enough. Hope she sues him again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

She, through her lawyer, already announced they intend to, but as of earlier this week her lawyer said there wasn’t quite enough as of yet.

Trump obviously won’t leave it alone, though, so knowing her lawyer is looking for it means the next lawsuit is pending.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

Doesn’t defamation require damages? At this point how does Trump saying anything damage her more or less?

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

832 sounds about right. And if they keep going, it keeps getting squared.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

As much as I want trump to hurt, don’t increase it.

For it to stick permanently, based on supreme Court case law, the amount needs to stay below a particular percentage. (I don’t remember the specifics, legal eagle has a good video on this)

So if you wanna hurt the Cheeto, hope it stays below that amount.

permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

Further, they don’t have to increase it. Trump already opened his mouth again making disparaging remarks again after the verdict. He create grounds for a third civil suit. E. Jean Carroll can simply file suit for the third case and with a third verdict.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

whelp… now it’s squared again.

(I realize… it’ll never happen, but seriously. fuck this guy and his delaying tactics.)

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Isn’t she already suing him a third time?

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Her lawyers said “we’re watching, we’re listening” - so, knowing he who cannot keep his trap shut, we just need to wait.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

is ‘strong probability’ a legal argument? kinda feels like nonsense

permalink
report
reply
16 points
*

They need to argue that to get them to suspend it pending appeal. They can’t argue for a suspension otherwise. That will get denied, but they’ve gotta try.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I think this, just like his NY one, are desperate attempts because he doesn’t have the money and cannot find anyone to cover a bond for him. He knows the next step is they start seizing assets, and that’s when we find out how over leveraged he is on all his properties.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

Next week: Trump’s lawyers say to judge, “Is defamation even really a crime? Can you stab someone with a defamation?”

permalink
report
reply
14 points

Just a question as a ignorant European. From what I understand he is now a convicted rapist, right? Does that mean he is entered in the sexual offenders database that you have in the states?

permalink
report
reply
34 points

No, he was not actually convicted of rape in a criminal court.

So even though a judge has called him a rapist he is not “legally” a rapist as he has not been found guilty of the crime of rape.

Criminal court is where you go when a DA is brining charges against you. Civil court is the place where you and I would go to settle a lawsuit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

He is legally a rapist now. Adjudicated by the court.

Just not criminally. (Yet)

He was close to getting nailed for child rape but he threatened and intimidated the victim out of testifying and she disappeared.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Thank you for explaining it. I still find it weird how it works, but ok.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

He was sued CIVILLY. if he is convicted CRIMINALLY then he’ll be registered as a sex offender

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

This is the U.S.A. Everything is weird.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I believe this was all done in civil court, not criminal.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 20K

    Posts

  • 511K

    Comments