• Concerns rise as Neuralink fails to provide evidence of brain implant success, raising safety and transparency questions.

• Controversy surrounds Neuralink’s lack of data on surgical capabilities and alarming treatment of monkeys with brain implants.

• While Neuralink touts achievements, experts question true innovation and highlight developments in other brain implant projects.

-60 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
43 points
*

There is no such thing as too quickly. People went from shitting in wooden outhouses with no electricity to man landing on the moon and harnessing the power of atoms in one life time, things have slowed down considerably since.

And you don’t have to get a brain implant, nor will such a thing realistically even be available for decades still.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Of course there’s such a thing as too quickly. Plenty of railroad workers died because people didn’t realize that there’s a huge difference between falling off a horse running ten miles an hour and a train going thirty. How many people got sick because someone thought putting lead in gas was a swell idea? What about Thalidomide? Heck, people thought heroin would cure opium addiction.

Just because people are reckless doesn’t mean that it’s a good thing.

I’m sure we’ll keep racing ahead, but don’t confuse activity with progress.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points
*

Falling from a horse at 10mph is dangers, falling from any height is dangerous.

We knew lead was poisonous before it was put into petrol, it was chosen because GM could patent it whereas they couldn’t the already known superior additive, ethanol.

We knew about man made climate change over a hundred years ago, it was buried and suppressed for profit.

Thalidomide wasn’t tested and sold freely.

Heroine was a good drug for many uses, lack of regulation and care about addiction was the problem. Even today many medications can have adverse effects or cause addiction if not properly used.

These things have nothing to do with the speed of advancement and all to do with deliberate failures. You can advance rapidly and still test and regulate, but obviously thats less likely in a capitalist system that values money over everything.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Those weren’t about speed of technology, it was capitalism being capitalism without being held back by regulation or worker protection.

How many people died designing the Internet? How many died to figure out how to land a rocket booster on a barge? How many people died figuring out mRNA vaccines?

permalink
report
parent
reply
66 points
*

So the gov wants to claim the FDA did not regulate mifepristone hard enough, but this is perfectly fine. What a world.

permalink
report
reply
43 points

“The government” doesn’t want to argue that. Some idiot politicians do.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

The courts gave the idiots an injunction, so while you are right they are not exactly claiming it, they are claiming it is likely true.

And the courts are (a part) of the gvt last time I checked.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Claiming the schizophrenic US govt WANTS anything is dubious. Most of their attention is focused on fighting each other

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

As I said, what a world.

permalink
report
parent
reply
78 points

I really wonder about the Doctors associated with this. How are they squaring things with their Hippocratic oath? This just seems really close to the ethical line, maybe over it. Nothing about how musk is treating this surprises me. But is everyone working on this also an unethical twat? Kind of scary to think that might be true.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

Well, it’s possible that it was a robot doctor, kinda doubt they took a Hippocratic oath

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Ethics only matters when there’s an effort to enforce it. The Hippocratic oath is just a reason your employer can fire you for making risky decisions. It means nothing if nobody holds you to it.

If you’re a doctor working for Neuralink, nobody will expect anything of you but to push the project forward as quickly as possible. For years you only work with monkeys, and when they do finally put a human in the O.R. it’s someone who signed away all their rights and accepted all risks to install experimental brain chips. At that moment, that human patient becomes the single most important subject in the entire experiment.

Of course you do it. You’re getting paid more money than you ever have in your life to do it, and the entire system is designed to protect you so long as you do what the boss says.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

But is everyone working on this also an unethical twat? Kind of scary to think that might be true

People with the Power to do cruel things always find cruel people to do their bidding. Especially when they can justify it with science or it’s “for the better of humanity”. Even if every rational out stander is horrified by their doings.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I wouldn’t be surprised if there somehow were a cover-up of safety and efficacy of these devices.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points
*

In 1973 the U.S. Supreme Court rejected the Hippocratic Oath saying it didn’t cover the latest developments in medical practice.

I’m just… gonna go scream into a pillow in the corner now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-10 points

There’s nothing here that would violate it anyway. These people are literally working on tech to help quadriplegics. Even this article is mostly just “I wish they were more open about their research”, which is true of basically every research hospital in the world.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

These people are literally working on tech to help quadriplegics.

I mean… That’s the claim, but there’s no real explanation on how their implant could help quadriplegics more so than the current computer brain interface we’ve had for +10 years.

Computer brain interfaces have been around for years, the only novel idea is making it into a permanent implant. That being said, novel doesn’t necessarily mean good.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Ah yes, the classic “unless you think it will have a long-term benefit to someone else” exception to “do no harm”. I always forget about that part. /s

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

The Helsinki declaration https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_of_Helsinki

Is the reference for health sciences these days.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

This appears to be more geared towards experimentation. Super interesting and more relevant to the article for sure though!

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

The Hippocratic Oath is not a legally binding oath, and many doctors are not required to take this oath or any oath for that matter. Basically, at the end of the day, oaths only matter to the people who have the strength of character to hold to them no matter the cost and most people do not have that strength of character. Oaths mean nothing to those people when it comes down to it, it’s just a thing that you said once, nothing more.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Oh I know all that, but still…

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Can’t wait to see the medical drama where one doctor says “you took an oath, god dammt!” And for the other to reply “nope”

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

There are way less extreme example of doctors just fucking things up for a bag of money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

And more in general, humans. Imagine if Clarence Thomas had taken medicine instead of law when he was young

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

People are still people. Doctors are just as susceptible to compromising their ethics as everyone else, the only difference is that they probably have a higher bribe threshold.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Oh no shit.

Anyway

permalink
report
reply
75 points

Stupid article as it implies that doctors are concerned for a specific reason related to the subject’s health but it’s just background about this shitty experiment and how it can be dangerous. Regardless, I can’t believe someone volunteered for this and am unfortunately expecting documented issues in the future.

permalink
report
reply
-2 points

If my option was never move again and this would let me control a computer then I wouldn’t care about the risk

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

The results are in. You now feel as if you are constantly moving. You aren’t, but it sure feels that way. Forever.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I’m sure the guy who had a pig heart transplant thought similar. He died less than a year after.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

i’d do it for money. Not much to fuck up with my brain

permalink
report
parent
reply
75 points

Remember how they couldn’t get the cyber truck to not rust? Or the bullet proof windows to work? Or how the milage for most Tesla’s was impossible, so people thought their cars were broken, and instead of either confessing or fixing the mileage they created an elaborate scheme to cancel appointment so people couldn’t get their batteries looked at? These are the people you trusted to put a chip in your brain…

permalink
report
parent
reply
-20 points

I’m not using it, might as well sacrifice for the good of the many

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That’s fine, but this ain’t it. There are many stories of important and heroic acts of medical martyrdom, but they all share one important thread: the scientists involved knew what they were doing. This, this isn’t that. Another dead won’t improve anything here, it’ll just result in unnecessary pain.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

I think it would be a lot more reasonable to expect undocumented issues. They have a lot to lose and it’s controlled by a billionaire. As if they’re not going to try to cover it up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

They will try to cover it up for sure. IMO Either it will “silently end” after myriad health issues or there will be big public exposures.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

I doubt you’ll hear any docs about failures. I think that’s what this article is about? I.e. a lack of transparency?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 18K

    Monthly active users

  • 11K

    Posts

  • 505K

    Comments