The judge, however, lifted a ban on Trump’s ability to obtain loans from a New York bank, which could allow him to obtain the necessary funds

108 points

I don’t understand why he would be allowed to borrow money for this purpose. Seems to me that would be an opportunity to commit more fraud by using properties at inflated values as collateral.

permalink
report
reply
11 points

Realistically, selling something like Trump Tower isn’t the same as getting cash for a car.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

You mean he doesn’t have the cash on hand.

Realistically, if you need to sell your car, your .ode of transport to mount your appeal, it should be no easier for someone with investments that won’t impact their life, only their income.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Most rich people don’t have cash on hand and don’t want it.

I remember reading a story where a con man is talking about money. He tells his protege that if he wants to look like a rube he’ll pull out a fat wad of hundreds. If he wants to look like a doctor or lawyer he’ll use a premium credit card, but if he wants to look like a real high roller he’ll come in with an assistant who handles the payments.

It’s a little like physics. Different rules when you get to the quantum level.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Any bank lending to Trump is at high risk of losing money. He could’ve gotten a loan from any bank in any other state, right? How is having access to a bank in NY going to change anything?

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

Probably because they would accept Trump Tower and other NY assets as collateral. But any bank that actually did and tried to sieze them after he defaults would likely face years of lawsuits. Caveat emptor and all that.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Isn’t there a special master monitoring his finances? If so, I’m fine with giving him more rope

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I think so. I’m not sure what the special master does.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Hopefully, every bank is on to his scams at this point and would require 3rd party appraisals.

I would be more concerned that he would use it to launder money. For example, he can’t use campaign money to pay his civil judgment, but his campaign could “rent” some space and other services from Trump corp for exorbitant amounts to raise the funds to pay the loan. He has been using the scam to launder Russia mob money since the 80s.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Got to be honest, I don’t think it was an issue of banks not knowing about the scam.

I wouldn’t be surprised if some of these “loans” weren’t partially secured with foreign checkbooks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

I am sure there’s a Russian bank out there that will give him amazing terms on a “loan”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Would love for that to happen, then US seizes the Russian funds. Would be hilarious.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

Well, the feds fucking love letting someone commit additional crimes while they watch

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I bet it’s more of a non-issue in that no bank is going to lend anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I can see why no bank would lend him money, especially with the risk of his properties being seized. But this guy keeps getting away with it. I won’t believe it until I see it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Might be a bank in Russia…

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

So he borrows the money, posts the bond, loses, and either simply doesn’t repay the loan or his benefactors forget there ever was a loan.

For the love of humanity, can we please get some actual consequences to actually stick?

permalink
report
reply
5 points

They will forgive all his debt for a few strategic political favors when they insert him as president.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

I wonder if any banks are braindead enough to loan him the cash.

permalink
report
reply
-4 points

I’d actually be more surprised if banks didn’t lend him money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Why? He’ll stall and they’ll end up with nothing when he dies

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

They’ll be betting on him becoming president again and repaying them with reduced regulations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Like vultures picking at the bones of a corpse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Losses are great for laundering money.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Russian banks might.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

It would be a good deal. They might demand twice the value in collateral.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

Seems like only one bank is braindead enough and it’s NY-based. Hint: Deutsche Bank’s US operations are NY-based.

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points

His Russian oligarch buddies at Deutsche (Douche) Bank are all fund frozen

Time to hit up the Saudi’s

Maybe Credit Suisse (Sus) will help out— they are plenty dirty.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

More specifically Deutsche Bank is NY-based and thus covered by the ban from borrowing for 3 years. Which he had to get removed because no other bank will lend to him.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Well look at that so happens someone in the Trump org got a big ol Saudi pay check just after he left office if memory serves. Maybe they could help out!

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

His trust fund allowance and his daily grifts of MAGA won’t save him.

permalink
report
reply
8 points

He only needs to sell 1,135,000 pairs of sneakers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Weird, someone in Russia and also NK just bought half a million pairs. And some MAGA NFTs. (They don’t require any delivery. But they have a few requests…)

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 385K

    Comments