10 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
1 point
*

Cute that you think they don’t. This is what it looks like

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

Nice socks lol

permalink
report
reply
40 points
*

There’s a great (and short) video about encryption back-doors by CGP Grey: “Should all locks have keys? Phones, Castles, Encryption, and You.” (Piped link).

“No matter how much we might wish it, there’s no way to build a digital lock that only angels can open and demons cannot. Anyone saying otherwise is either ignorant of the mathematics or less of an angel than they appear.”

EDIT: I still hate you Piped bot.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Even more generally than that, remember that daemons are fallen angels and that same thing happens outside the metaphorical world.

So even if the mathematics allowed it, once something is out and being use with backdoored encryption sooner or later the “bad guys” will have the means to use it if only because of human nature.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

“Should all locks have keys? Phones, Castles, Encryption, and You.”

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

It’s ok PipedBot, I will always love you.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-20 points

so hawt

permalink
report
reply
6 points

How about we cut back on the misogyny.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I agree he said it in the wrong way, but is now misogyny to acknoledge that in addition to being really smart she is also a nice looking woman ?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It is wrong, because it’s makes it uncomfortable for women to be in power, or in the public eye.
Every time we allow it, it normalizes the problem, and perpetuates it.

She’s out there trying to make it harder for governments and corporations to abuse our personal data. We want to uplift THAT message, not reduce it to a discussion about her appearance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Technically not misogyny—just good ol’ fashioned objectification.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points
*

IDK, I wouldn’t say calling someone hot is even objectification. You can respect someone who you consider smart and there dimensional and also think they’re hot.

I’d say it’s just inappropriate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

She got a great hair

permalink
report
reply
-4 points

And leggings

permalink
report
parent
reply

Technology

!technology@lemmy.world

Create post

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 567K

    Comments