Fuck Russian trash.

permalink
report
reply
51 points

lol the tankies downvoted you

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

Lemmygrad, lemmy.ml and hexbear in shambles.

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Oh hexbear too? I have noticed a lot of questionable posts coming from there

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Lemmygrad, lemmy.ml and hexbear

A trifecta of varying qualities of propaganda. An axis of artifice.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

There are good people in Russia.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

There are good people everywhere.

Doesn’t really change the fact that Russia, more or less in its current form, has been bullying its neighbours for half a millenia. Longer, if you count the Grand Duchy of Moscow as Russia.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I don’t consider them to be Russian trash. Only Putin and his sympathizers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s such a bizarre thing… Communism fell in Russia probably before many of these people were born. But the support the successor state to the Soviet Union, which is an authoritarian kleptocracy, because why? Nostalgia? Ignorance?

Tankies be weird.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

russia was never communist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

I guess you would call Navalny tankie too

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
*

Fuck Zionist and pro-Putin trash instead!

permalink
report
parent
reply
-28 points

Don’t be racist. Russian government is to blame, not their people who are constantly oppressed by their government. Russian people are the biggest victims in Ukranian war, lost more lives fighting for some idiot. Some successfully surrendered, but a lot of them are forced to fight and lost their innocent lives in all of this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Russian people are the biggest victims in Ukranian war,

Whew lad

permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points

Most of the casulties are russian troops, are they not? They don’t join volonterily you know, they are forcefully conscripted.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Imagine people in the US electing Trump, then 10 years later writing the same thing.

Russian people are as much at fault.

Do you know what happened to Musolini? Where are the russian partisans?

Bunch of cowards.

They’re forced to fight, but not forced to commit atrocities and war crimes that they did.

“Russian people are the biggest victims” - fuck right off. Just fuck off.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Imagine people in the US electing Trump, then 10 years later writing the same thing.

I mean, I would kinda get that, no? It’s not as though most people in the US voted for trump last time. Not even counting the popular vote thing, right, which is still pretty important, but like, people who didn’t vote for whatever reason, even. Maybe that’s because they’re not exercising their right to democracy or what have you, and so it’s still their fault, idk. I guess you could include the clause of prisoners and former convicts, who aren’t allowed to vote. I guess my broader point is that, seeing as how kind of, horrendously stupid and undemocratic the elections are here in america, especially at the federal level, I would not really expect russia, and the russians to be any better off. I’d actually probably expect them to be much, much worse off, so I don’t think I’d feel comfortable blaming them for their political system.

I also don’t understand why it’s kind of a controversial stance to kind of, empathize with people that are conscripted into a war. I don’t think, really, over ukranians, right, but empathizing with them nonetheless, I don’t see why that’s controversial. It would be like saying that all americans were at fault for vietnam, which is kind of obviously an extremely simplified and even somewhat useless perspective to have, on the historical factors that were leading up to that war. The election processes that went into it, the economic factors, the henry kissinger shit, the public pushback that helped to end it. Certainly I wouldn’t blame the anti-war protestors or the people who voted against the powers that be for the war, they were clearly fighting against it. I don’t hear a lot about any organized grassroots resistance against the ukranian war in russia, I think probably more as a nature of my westernized news consumption, I’d assume, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it was the case that there was some level of pushback against this war domestically, especially given the history of cross-pollination and cultural exchange between the two regions.

I’m also not sure that like, attributing war crimes and atrocities to a whole population or to the whole of conscripted soldiers is really a great thing to do, that strikes me as kind of xenophobic. I’ve seen that same sort of propaganda spouted about almost every enemy america has faced in the middle east, both true and untrue. Unless their military doctrine or military culture has kind of a demonstrated slant towards those kinds of things, then I feel pretty questionable about it. Those sorts of controversies don’t serve much to sort of, shed actual light on the core problems there, which is that there’s a war happening in the first place. I’m also kind of skeptical that they would serve to galvanize anti-war support, thus, serving to end the war, but I’d be more willing to be convinced of that.

In any case I’m not going to blame the russian people for not having a mass revolution or well organized resistance movement right this moment, and for not overthrowing their government, just as I wouldn’t don’t blame americans for the same thing. I don’t think that’s a particularly unreasonable stance to have, I think it’s realistic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points

So are US people to blame for Biden supporting genocide in Israel? Or have they just voted for what they saw as lesser evil. You have to understand that Navalny, has started as a real neo-nazzi. Talking about killing all the muslims in the area. It is the same thing in every country. There are no real democracies in the World, people have to vote for the lesser of evils, or at least that is what they see as the only option.

permalink
report
parent
reply
126 points

So Poutine wanted to weaken NATO, ends up adding countries, including one that has been neutral for an incredibly long time.

permalink
report
reply
62 points

Sweden has a strong military industry too and Finnland is literally right at Russia’s border. Putin is a master strategist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

Dude really read a history book about Hitler fighting a one front war and somehow turning it into a three front war and said “Hold my beer”

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Your comment reminded me of this video, highly worth a watch : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=si9Phc9ArpU

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://www.piped.video/watch?v=si9Phc9ArpU

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I’m open-source; check me out at GitHub.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Your spellcheck outed you as a Canadian

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Side note, this is also the French spelling of Putin. So you can eat Poutine while being mad at Poutine (I’ll let you guess which is which, unless you’re a cannibal then everything goes TBF).

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Sorry, french changes the spelling of proper nouns?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I thought it was “putain”

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yeah, and it made me kinda hungry too…

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Cheese curds have nothing to do with this.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You’re right, at least cheese curds get thrown out when the go bad. Kinda like what Putin does with critics.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*

[Pours hot gravy on Putin] “A crown for King.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Cheese curds go bad? I guess I never let them last long enough to find out.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I never knew the Russian president was actually a Canadian dish in disguise.

In fact, come to think of it, why don’t the Russians simply eat him? If he’s that delicious then surely they gotta dig in.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points

Yeah, he is either stupid or desperate. It does worry me how centralized power balance in the World has become over US controlling most of the conflicts and countries in the World.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yeah, he is either stupid or desperate.

I’ll pick the middle option: Putin is high on his own supply.

The man made it clear that dissent will be met with swift and gruesome consequences. This is a sure-fire recipe for surrounding yourself with yes-men that are not smart enough to get the hell out. And BTW, that’s always a career where everyone’s last promotion is “pavement inspector”, and training starts immediately at an open 6th floor window. So there’s some cocky, can’t-guage-risk-for-a-damn people mixed in there too. The result is a bunch of decisions from the head-of-state that only make sense between those in his court, and fail to hold up to scrutiny outside those walls.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

How is the US controlling conflicts and countries?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-8 points

By CIA coups, puppet governments, military funding, weapon supplies to insurgents or to the governments, sanctions, etc.

permalink
report
parent
reply
92 points
*

Good. Sweden has very strong military capabilities with their Total Defense strategy. They also have very advanced weapons development and a huge defense industry, including their Gripen fighter jets. NATO got a lot stronger today.

permalink
report
reply
73 points

As a Swede I often find myself thankful we don’t have the military brainwashing the US has, even though we have a strong military for such a small country. The army stuff is there if you look but if you don’t care you don’t notice it much, if at all. I’m not invested enough to have a really informed opinion about us joining NATO. But from what I know it’ll be a good thing, just being able to help countries more that need it is enough of a reason IMO.

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

NATO was originally founded so that we’d stop invading each other, which should still hold true today.

I like to think of most developed nations as young adults. All of us are supposed to be mature, which means no more war. We can just talk about things like responsible adults.

Sadly, some of these younger fucks still haven’t grasped the concept of “don’t be an idiot”, and we now need NATO for a strong message of “no, you’re not going to touch us, there will be consequences”. It’s a sad thing that we still need to do so, but I’d rather have a large group of friends that I’m sure will have my back if someone would start shit.

So yes, Sweden joining NATO is a good thing. If anything it will lead to better cooperation and coordination between our countries. Not just in the event of war, but just sharing defense resources and intelligence as well. But the best argument is that we just like you Swedes, and we want to keep hanging out together.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

You are confusing NATO and UN. UN was founded so that we’d stop invading each other.

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
*

As a Finn, I thought that joining Nato was the last nail in the coffin. After several decades of crawling towards it, we’re finally a western civilized country now.

You swedes were there already for historical reasons though, but very nice to have you in the same military alliance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Unless you happen to be Russian or some other power seeking to use military aggression, or the threat there of, against Europe or North America, NATO expansion is a good thing for all parties. The larger the alliance, the more viewpoints, training and speciality each nation can provide and there is less gap for something to get through. Ukraine is a perfect example of why this should have happened a long time ago but political will wasn’t there.

Sweden has a lot to offer NATO and vice versa, its certainly self sufficient for its military needs but with the defense guarantee it can now afford to diversity its military a bit more than its used to with not everyone and everything needing to adhere to a total defense doctrine. There won’t be any Swedish Expeditionary Forces but Sweden does have some rather unique experience and training it can exchange with its western neighbors and possible get some technology exchange and other material assistance to help shore up the northern borders of NATO. The Baltic Sea becoming a NATO lake just a bonus now if Russia tries to start or continue its usual shit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-31 points

This just means that Sweden will have send their troops to fight wars in middle east for oil companies. Russia is hardly capable of attacking Ukraine that is right next to it and has some local support of some Russian citizens. They would never make it to Sweden in the next 100 years. But a lot of lives will be lost in the Middle East in that time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

isn’t NATO a defensive treaty? which would mean no obligation to participate in actions of aggression?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-50 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
73 points

NATO just got a little Sweder

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Plis stop dö fajting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

But a mööse bit my sister.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Deth tu mööse! Joyna NATO.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
66 points

Fucking Putin

permalink
report
reply
4 points

Yes. Also blame the members of the security council for preventing the UN being effective in solving global conflicts. Ideally, NATO wouldn’t be necessary

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Disagree. UN is a diplomacy tool, NATO is a defense organization. Entirely different goals, and if UN was a defense organization something else would have filled the void for diplomacy and you’d say UN wouldn’t be necessary.

You don’t play diplomacy with your friends. And you cannot get your enemies to sit down if you’re aiming a gun at them. The UN not having teeth is the point.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You’ve never heard of UN peacekeepers?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

the un and nato serve two very different and distinct purposes though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yes?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeeeaahh, but this is a slightly different beast. Even if the UN had fangs ( you’re right there), we’re talking about a nuclear dictatorship with visions of conquest here.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I think you might be reading something into my comment that wasn’t there. Or I didn’t intend, at least. In no way am I trying to minimise Putin’s evil behaviour. The point I was trying to make is that NATO shouldn’t be necessary. The UN should be capable of keeping everyone safe. I’m not anti NATO nor anti UN thou.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-108 points
*

I think this haterred towards Putin blinded most of us to let governments increase their authorariansim. Like in US after 9/11. Of course Putin is dangerous, but he can’t even win a war in a small country right next to his. Lost more troops then Ukraine. Meanwhile NATO expansion across the World and US influance is truely scary and unprecedented. Most of the wars in World are started by NATO counties and here we don’t hear about is as much.

All the invasions of Iran, Afganistan, Vietnam, Syria, etc where unjustfied invasions just like Ukraine and in case of Palestine, far worse. Yet, media successfully is pointing our focus on a single war in Ukraine where Russia has made no advencments and is clearly inferior military power. It reminds me of 9/11, when fear from a small group of terrorist gave the government power to spy on all of its citizens, run torture camp in Guantanamo and remove citizens rights one by one.

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

Ah, yes, the scary defense-only alliance. Purely by design it doesn’t have the lawful capacity to do any of the things you said, and single members (US or UK) don’t represent it.

Ah yes, no advancements in Ukraine where 1/3 of the country is under occupier control and in entrenched positions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-31 points
*

In is defensive only on paper. In reality it is NATO weapons that supply wars in Middle East. Joining NATO isn’t just mutual defense, you need to sign a lot of other requirements that inevitably gets you under strong influance of US military and finances. Check out military intervantions of NATO, they are all offensive, no one ever attacked a NATO country, they are too strong. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO#Military_operations None of these counties they invaded where part of NATO, Iraq, Afganistan, Kosovo, Bosina, Libya.

Laws don’t matter when you have the military power. Laws only apply to the weak. Powerful countires (and people) don’t protect them selves with laws, since they have the military. When Assange and Manning published US war crimes, militry officials didnt go to jails, but they, whistlblowers and journalists did. Don’t fall for the laws for a second, they don’t apply to them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points
*

I think this haterred towards Putin blinded most of us to let governments increase their authorariansim.

Don’t you think this haterred towards Putin caused by increasing authorariansim of my country’s government? Because Putin is fucking head of it.

Of course Putin is dangerous, but he can’t even win a war in a small country right next to his.

I don’t know what is (not) concerning to you, but for me Good Uncle Voenkom that will send me to die in trenches for Stability™ of Putin’s yachts is concerning enough.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Stay safe comrade. The rest of the world prays that the Russian people will know freedom rather than authoritarianism.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Because Putin is fucking head of it.

Thank you for taking a risk by posting here and speaking truth to power. People like you give me hope.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Your people are Putin’s first victims. I hope we’ll one day have cooperation and peace between Russia and the West, as proper friendly neighbors. You guys deserve so much better than Putin.

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

In what way has the Russian Invasion of Ukraine led to more authoritarianism among NATO member states?

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

This is so lazy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-23 points

It is in regards to this article that we are talking about these things. NATO membership grew after this Russian invasion. Even from countries that are under no obvious imidiate danger.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

There’s a difference between NATO countries and NATO the organisation.

The United States would be going around the world starting wars regardless of whether it’s in NATO or not. Got to feed that industrial military complex

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
-21 points

But they also influence NATO organizations through various requirements of joining the NATO so that in the practice, they are involved. NATO as an organization has participated in mmultiple invasitions around the World, it is on the Wikipedia page. All of their military involvements where in non-NATO countries. Nobody ever attacked a NATO country, they never did a defensive war. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO#Military_operations

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

So so dangerous to have a defense alliance. What is this world coming to.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Defense alliance that invades countries in middle east.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

All the invasions of Iran, Afganistan, Vietnam, Syria, etc where unjustfied invasions

  • The US has never invaded Iran
  • Afganistan was completely justified; the US could not let 9/11 go. Few countries in the world disputed this at the time, even among those unfriendly to the US. You can certainly criticize how it played out–I sure as hell do.
  • Vietnam, yeah, not going to argue there
  • Syria was a complex 13 way clusterfuck. We supported a specific side against another specific side, mostly with material and air support, and some limited ground support. It’s not exactly an invasion, but this is certainly another place where it’s more about how it played out than the support in itself.
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Maybe he meant Iraq? I think Afghanistan taught us a lesson in what we’ve become. We were a country that could bomb another into the ground, but then rebuild it into a functional society. Regardless of the morals of that, japan and south korea are functional if unhappy. Unhappiness describes life, but I feel like the contracting on top of contacting and the line goes up profit obsession infected out zeitgeist so deeply, we are no longer capable of rebuilding what we destroy.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points

I did mean Iraq, but Iran is not much better. US staged a coup in Iran to get a puppet government https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1953_Iranian_coup_d’état#Release_of_U.S._government_records_and_official_acknowledgement Afganistan is not justified, you don’t invade an entire country because of a terroist attack. It was an excuse, just like the Patriot Act for more imperisalism and antidemocratic actions. Calling things invasions are semantics, more important is the bigger picture. US has huge influnace in the region thorug coups and military invasions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Iraq was bad so let’s let Russia annex any bit of Europe it wants. Checks out. I was vehemently opposed to Iraq. This is not Iraq. Not all wars are the same

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I never said we should let Russia annex anything, you are assuming that because I am against NATO expansion that I am pro Russia.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Yeah but USA would have done all that with or with out NATO.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

True. I am just saying that NATO is helping them and they are using this as an excuse to get more countries into NATO to help them with their wars.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Lmfao

permalink
report
parent
reply
-20 points

Can you elaborate?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Putin doesn’t want to win. And actually pretty much everyone benefits from this long standing conflicts. Except for Ukrainians and some dirt poor African nations.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Yeah, I wouldn’t be surprised. Regular people are always the ones that suffer, on both sides, while for the politicians it is just about profit.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-3 points
*

I don’t think this deserves the attack, guy speaks their mind, perhaps not from the most knowledgeable position, but I think it’s valid nonetheless. There are a lot of arguments being made without really being arguments, more like spoken worries, and I agree with their trepidation, I feel kind of the same way, in that I am wary of the future and not as expediently joyous over the occasion so to speak.

Also, I felt like when the CEO Prime Minister of Sweden appeared in the House for the State of the Union address to standing ovations felt like we were bringing water and dirt before Xerxes. A half demented, half man half werewolf Xerxes, I have a conspiracy theory that Biden and Trump are the same person. Make of it what you will, the list of US atrocities committed across the world and our common history is a long and dire read, and only seems to get longer every year.

I’m glad to know that if “someone” invades Sweden the whole planet will go down in a nuclear holocaust, as a deterrent you know, but at the same time we’re ironically posed before a problem common to Americans and Swedes alike- when it comes to our choices it’s slim pickings.

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!world@lemmy.world

Create post

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

  • Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:

    • Post news articles only
    • Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
    • Title must match the article headline
    • Not United States Internal News
    • Recent (Past 30 Days)
    • Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
  • Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think “Is this fair use?”, it probably isn’t. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.

  • Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.

  • Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.

  • Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19

  • Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

  • Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

  • Rule 7: We didn’t USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you’re posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

Community stats

  • 12K

    Monthly active users

  • 15K

    Posts

  • 248K

    Comments