78 points

Most motorists? Why is it only people who enjoy motoring that get a say in this? What about the rest of us?

I don’t drive and I want them to crack down on those loud as feck vehicles, especially the dirt bike races they have regularly.

Loud as feckin hell.

permalink
report
reply
24 points

Car brain headline / premise. Of course only the opinion of motorists is actually valid, you poor jaywalking peasant!

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

I think the point is to show that even amongst their peers, people who love loud pipes are a minority that the majority would gladly see being stopped.

I agree now but I once was young and had a loud pipe on my truck and on my motorcycle (always with a catalytic converter though!), I think it’s just a natural phase in the car person’s evolution… Then you’ve got a bunch of Harley riders and Dodge Ram drivers that never grow past that phase…

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

I think they were assuming that ~100% of non-motorists agreed

permalink
report
parent
reply
67 points

Intentionally loud exhausts are obnoxious and selfish. As much as I dislike it, however, I’d far rather deal with the noise than having yet more surveillance. We’re already the #3 most surveilled country in the world, only the USA and China is worse.

permalink
report
reply
24 points

Harley Davidson bikes are just noise pollution. Unlike cars they are build like this out of the factory.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Yea to me it’s not the volume of the engine/exhaust. It’s that it’s intentionally obnoxious

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

No they aren’t. Harleys are quiet with the factory exhaust, it’s just that they are commonly modified with aftermarket (louder) exhausts.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

We may be number 3 but we must be number 1 in terms of % of people monitored by some form of camera. The USA road network is nowhere near as heavily monitored as the UK.

Driving through France, Belgium and the Netherlands was very free compared to the UK.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

A taxi driver in Singapore once told me that they hold this title, ahead of the UK. He then pointed out the cameras on almost every lamp post.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Ahh yeh that sounds about right actually.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Electrics cars will make it a non issue but then we will be stuck with the surveillance. Our country is scary. No one cares.

Having said that if you are intentionally being noisy for noisy sake there should be harder punishments. Even lose your license for a bit, it’s not a got given right to drive. You got to earn it.

All drivers should be considerate of others

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Electrics cars will make it a non issue

I do not see EVs replacing scooters (which are driven by lower budget commuters). A single unmuffled scooter driving through #Paris at 3am can wake up 10,000 people according to Bruitparif. And don’t forget horns. Assholes will used their horns at 3am on my street. The only thing they give a fuck about is their own convenience when their favorite parking spot is taken.

The idea of harsh punishments works if a vehicle is continuously loud because it will eventually cross paths with a cop. So that position is fair enough. But what about horns? There’s never a cop around when horns are misused.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Electric scooters are a thing.

In fact they are huge.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

It seems most of the UK has forgotten the 5th of November

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point
*

I’d far rather deal with the noise than having yet more surveillance.

My cognitive dissonance triggers on this point because one of the reasons I cycle is privacy. I am also firmly in the #fuckCars camp (noise, pollution, death, selfishness of people putting their convenience above lives of other people & animals). It’s hard to give a shit about car drivers having privacy. And also realize that car drivers inherently sign up to give up privacy in order to use a personal car anyway (registration, insurance, banking transactions tied to those activities and their fuel purchases, etc). The fuel purchases of car drivers feed the oil industry, which in the US feeds the war chests of republican candidates who disrespect both privacy and the environment.

Yet people making the wise pro-privacy considerate decision to cycle are still exposed to breath car fumes, noise, and life-threatening physics (e=mc²).

Hard to have sympathy for car drivers. Although my dissonance needle moves a bit more if these noise cams are always recording video and thus capturing all people not in cars. I don’t know if that’s the case.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

yes, and here you have an opportunity for that overwatch to benefit your daily lives. Accepting it everywhere else but bitching about it here seems pretty self defeating.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

If it wasn’t obvious, I don’t accept it everywhere else, I think the state surveillance apparatus should be completely dismantled.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

So you protest the ubiquitous surveillance a bunch?

Often?

Ever?

Yeah. Never. You’ve never once gone out on the real ones taking the piss out of you every fucking day. Never.

But this has you up in arms.

To put things succinctly, I’m not convinced mate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
59 points

Noise cameras? They’re called MICROPHONES

permalink
report
reply
22 points

But they need a camera to grab the license plate of the offending vehicle…

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

I’m not sure if this a joke. Noise cameras are a real thing. They use an array of microphones to show which parts of an image are emitting sound and at what level.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I read it as being a riff off of “speed” cameras, which are obviously cameras triggered by speed and not cameras that capture the concept of speed on film.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

I think the cameras are supposed to be triggered by noise

permalink
report
parent
reply
43 points

I live in a city center, and frequently have loud cars drive past. Some are substantially worse than others. The loudest of them are so loud that when they go past I can’t hear my TV for 30 seconds or so, and that’s with my windows all closed and listening via headphones.

Something really does need to be done to enforce the noise laws that are often being ignored.

permalink
report
reply
32 points

I never even considered that was an option. I figured loud jackasses was just something we’d have to live with.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Can we do this with mouths too?

permalink
report
parent
reply

United Kingdom

!unitedkingdom@feddit.uk

Create post

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think “reputable news source” needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

Community stats

  • 1.4K

    Monthly active users

  • 1.9K

    Posts

  • 18K

    Comments