14 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
-32 points

Have some humanity. I fucking hate Mitch and the GOP as much as anyone, but this seems like nothing more than a tragic accident. The woman had a family and Im grieving their loss. This sucks all around.

permalink
report
parent
reply
91 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
56 points

True, they were ready to send us all back to work at the start of the pandemic, no matter how many of us died or had family members killed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

As seen in Isreal and the pandemic response. $$$$ is worth more than the life of minions to them. Humanity is better off without that scum.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

Fuck no, zero sympathy for billionaires.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Still , it’s not something I’d be comfortable laughing about.

Edit: Seeing vs not seeing federated downvotes on kbin is really night and day

permalink
report
parent
reply
55 points
*

If you could push a button and get $1 million but a random person dies, would you push it? Billionaires are pushing that button all day every day, as many times as they possibly can

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Exactly.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

I would not push such a button.

I don’t think the kids who just miss their mom this morning are undeserving of my empathy no matter how much money the mom had. I can’t just turn off how I feel about this. I am sorry I made so many here angry though.

permalink
report
parent
reply
60 points

She’s a fucking billionaire that spends holidays with Mitch McConnell.

No one she knows gives a single fuck about you or anyone you know.

And they’re actively hurting millions of people without a second thought.

Don’t waste your pity on someone like this

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

To be fair, the plea was for humanity, not billionairity. At some point this person was an infant and we’d protect and care about her then.

Yes, the inequality is atrocious and her party is cruel and ruthless about expanding it, but therein lies the catch - we’re all gonna go some day. Right? Literally at the end of it we’re all the same in that regard. (cryogenicists and brain-in-a-computer people to the left)

So I think it’s a crazy and sad story, I feel bad for the human, but the larger metaphor is ok to be temporarily amused by, imho. Y’know the problem with the French Revolution was they got really into beheading people. Children, pets, etc. Like, way more than anyone should, “even though” etc. Because if we lose that humanity we’re worse off than we are now, right?

Anyway, don’t sweat the downvotes, humanity person. It’s just people being mad about billionaires, and who isn’t?

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Im grieving their loss

That’s seems odd for someone you don’t know or care about at all.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

That’s what empathy is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I don’t know why, but it’s easy for me to imagine a person out there just grieving the loss of their mom this morning, and in turn imagining how I might feel in their shoes. It feels bad, and my heart does go out to them.

I am sorry that I made so many people here angry, but I can’t turn off how I feel about it. i stand by it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Wow this thread is a straight condemnation of Lemmy’s high-horse. It’s wild that the comment above yours is neutralized on votes and yours is so far in the negative. What did you do that was so worthy of condemnation? Express concern for another human being’s family.

Of course, people here will tell you that billionaires discount lives on daily even while they discount the lives of the loved ones of this woman. Were all of them billionaires? Perhaps. Regardless of the size of their pockets we do know that they are human.

Folks that lean left generally understand what it’s like to be caught in the circumstances of your birth. It’s incredibly telling that this self-same group finds it so easy to dismiss the value of this human life and those around her.

You’re right to be concerned for the well-being of others, and I believe I’m right to be concerned about the company we’re keeping here. It’s seemingly a group of people that will dismiss the death of someone wealthy, even while they assume the wealthy will dismiss the death of the poor. I wouldn’t say it’s entirely incorrect even though it’s just as morally bankrupt.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Your empathy for unempathetic people is depressing. Stand up for yourself better.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

So much online discourse I’ve seen on here is just the same as Reddit. Stripping the humanity of people you don’t like. It’s just tribalist, cringey, and narcissistic.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-1 points

Folks that lean left generally understand what it’s like to be caught in the circumstances of your birth. It’s incredibly telling that this self-same group finds it so easy to dismiss the value of this human life and those around her.

You seem to have attributed feelings of people here to one side or the other, how and why? Do you have a record of how each person leans politically?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s okay. I realize lots of people are suffering and as a result tensions are high. I didn’t mean to make everyone so angry and I realize my initial comment of ‘have some humanity’ was to harsh. I’m sorry I made so many people angry with this.

I do feel bad for the people that loved this woman regardless of how much money she has. I don’t wish that pain on anyone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
112 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
74 points
*

“After a Friday evening celebrating Lunar New Year with close friends, Chao decided to drive back to the main house on the ranch around 11:30 p.m., the Journal reported.”

I wonder if she had been drinking.

“According to the Journal’s account, Chao told her friend that she had put her car in reverse instead of drive — a mistake she had made before — leading her to back over an embankment and into the pond.”

Tesla removed the shift stalks from X and *S models in 2021 in favor of the car guessing which direction you want to go, with the option to override on the touchscreen.

Edit: Originally stated Y by mistake. Chao was driving an X when the incident occurred.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

That would be Model S & X. Model 3 stalks are removed in 2023/2024 Highland refresh. Model 3 Performance hasn’t been highlanded yet so that one still has stalks. Model Y hasn’t released their refresh yet so all versions of Model Y have stalks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

You’re correct. I typed Y by mistake and have edited my post. Chao was driving an X when the incident occurred.

permalink
report
parent
reply
119 points
*

Tesla removed the shift stalks from X and Y models in 2021 in favor of the car guessing which direction you want to go, with the option to override on the touchscreen.

what? What in the hell is going on at that place!? That is so fucking stupid and dangerous.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

Hahahahahaha what the actual fuck for real.

Musk: “Trust my car, bro” Car: goes in reverse instead of forward

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Billionaire do without consequence. US nothing. Iz nao.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

60% of the time, it works every time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

yea this is quite the absurd design decision.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

“We’re so confident in our self driving tech we removed the steering wheel”

permalink
report
parent
reply
-23 points

Give me the touchscreen gear shift. It’s not that hard, and I’d rather not have the extra physical object in the car.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

Tesla removed the shift stalks from X and *S models in 2021 in favor of the car guessing which direction you want to go, with the option to override on the touchscreen.

Holy shit, I thought you were joking but that’s real.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Tesla removed the shift stalks from X and Y models in 2021 in favor of the car guessing which direction you want to go,

Holy shit, I thought you were joking. How the hell did that pass any regulatory body?

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

It$ a my$tery i$nt it. Fortunately we all are subject to the rule of law in this cou . . . hahahahahaha nahhh just joshin’. The rich are above the law. Everyone else needs to resort to extreme violence, apparently. That is to say, I really don’t know what the DoJ is thinking.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

That’s crazy.

Whoever was in charge of U.S. transportation when that system got approved must feel like a real jerk right now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Impossible. Conservatives don’t have the capacity for introspection.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You think they needed approval?

Hahahahahahahahhhaha

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Chao decided to drive back to the main house on the ranch around 11:30 p.m.

Ah the main house, yes. Of course. As one does.

DEBBIE: Can I ask you a question?

GRIM REAPER: What?

DEBBIE: How can we all have died at the same time? [silence]

GRIM REAPER: The Tesla!

GEOFFREY: Darling, you didn’t buy a Tesla, did you?

ANGELA: I’m most dreadfully embarrassed.

GRIM REAPER: Now the time has come. Follow. Follow me. [clunk] [bang bang bang bang bang]

GEOFFREY: Just… testing. Sorry.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

Huh. It’s almost like the safety decisions of a major automobile company being at the whim of a petulant billionaire is a bad idea. Who knew.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Lucky for them the ancient Egyptians can’t read English

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

Always carry a glass breaker in your car within reach of the drivers seat

permalink
report
reply
18 points

My car’s headrests have a glass breaker tip at the bottom of the metal bars that you use to raise/lower them. I imagine this is standard in many modern-ish cars.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Those aren’t glass breakers, and you probably can’t shatter the glass with those. Car windows are incredibly strong.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

https://carseatblog.com/38120/mythbusters-vehicle-headrests-are-meant-to-break-vehicle-windows/

Yeah, a fully closed car side window is extremely strong. However if you’re able to crack it just a bit it is far easier to break.

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Apparently not in door gap, trunk lid pours water into car, discharged battery can’t open rear passenger doors, Teslas.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

There’s a door handle override but it’s kind of hidden. Terrible, terrible user experience.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

New Teslas have laminated glass, not tempered glass. It does not shatter.

https://youtu.be/6tnEDH1HfD0?t=378

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

WTF, how can they just make a change like that, and it get approved to be on the road?

Youtube comment,

Tesla that crashed into a pole, it was on fire, and the driver was trapped behind the laminated glass. Scary situation.

The first in crew that responded had a firefighter try to break the glass with a conventional window punch device, that didn’t work.

Then he tried smashing it with some forcible entry tools, that didn’t work either.

The driver ended up dying. It took 45 mins to extinguish the flames and 15 mins to get the car doors open.

permalink
report
parent
reply
57 points

New Teslas have laminated glass, not tempered glass. It does not shatter.

https://youtu.be/6tnEDH1HfD0?t=378

permalink
report
parent
reply
68 points

So they’re death traps

Gotcha

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

I’ve just learned that laminated glass is now mandatory across all models since 2020.

https://lifelinerescuetools.com/blog/3397/

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

If I remember the MythBusters episode your only other options are to roll down the windows immediately and then start to exit or wait for the car to completely submerge and hope the electronics that control your windows and doors haven’t failed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I wonder how long the electronics last in the Tesla being submerged for the window to roll down.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Also, I’ve just learned that laminated glass is now mandatory across all models since 2020. Glass breakers won’t save you.

https://lifelinerescuetools.com/blog/3397/

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

And the world becomes ever so slightly more like Atlas Shrugged again

permalink
report
parent
reply
-14 points
*

If your car ever gets submerged, unbuckle your seatbelt, roll the windows down and once the water gets high enough in the car, you can open the door or climb through the window. This is pure panic from someone who should know better.

permalink
report
reply
29 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
47 points

In an old car with crank windows, that’ll work. In a new car, the electrics have to still be working, and in a Tesla the OS has to still be running.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

I think in a car with electric motors if it were to back into a pond could still get maybe get the windows down before the 12 volt system shut down.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

That’s why you need to have an emergency hammer with a belt cutter inside the car. Preferably one near every seat.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I’ve just learned that laminated glass is now mandatory across all models since 2020. You won’t be able to break the glass.

https://lifelinerescuetools.com/blog/3397/

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

makes me wonder what you can do in the same situation in a cybertruck. I guess it would not be easy to break bulletproof glass

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

If you can’t get the windows down before the water pressure seals them shut, it’s still survivable without a glass breaker if you keep your wits about you and the car doesn’t flip. You’d need to take a deep breath right before the interior completely fills with water and then just sit there until the pressure mostly equalizes. There was at least one reported case of someone in a submerged car specifically crediting their survival to Mythbusters successfully showing just that, but a variation of the scenario involving the car flipping while sinking into deeper water later proved to be much less survivable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yea if it ends up on it’s side, gonna have a bad time.

Bottom door is stuck in the mud and the top door will be extra heavy to open. Ouch.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Someone else in this comment thread pointed out that Tesla’s windows are laminated and not tempered so a glass break doesn’t actually work on them.

I just did a quick “fact check” as I was writing this and apparently there are multiple cars that are going to laminated glass windows. I’ll have to add that to the list of things I don’t want and have to check next time I’m shopping for a car.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

There is a mechanical emergency release on the doors. All my friends tend to find that if I don’t preemptively tell them to press the button with the minus sign.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

hidden behind the speakers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Why are you in emergency situations in your car so often that all your friends have to know about the button?

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

Tragic way to die. I wouldn’t wish this even on my worst enemies.

We all watch the videos of how to deal with this exact situation but in reality only a few people would be able to react accordingly to save themselves.

The article describes the area of water as a “pond” but the vehicle was fully submerged. Rescuers had trouble with rescue attempts due to the depth. Seems more like a lake to me.

permalink
report
reply
39 points

"there is no technical difference between lakes and ponds, according to the National Park Service. While the distinction between lakes and ponds can be a bit blurry, there are some general guidelines. For example, if sunlight can reach the bottom of the entire body of water, it’s generally considered a pond, according to the National Park Service. Conversely, if the body of water is deep enough in some places that sunlight cannot penetrate it, it’s generally considered a lake.

When it comes to size, though, there are no exact guidelines. Ponds are generally smaller than lakes, but there’s no universal standard. That means some things we call a pond might be considered a lake by some. And some lakes may be more pond-like to some people."

https://www.reconnectwithnature.org/news-events/the-buzz/whats-the-difference-lake-vs-pond/

permalink
report
parent
reply
16 points

A few years back, a woman drove her car into a small retaining pond off a highway and 2 of the kids in the car drowned. Everyone was amazed that a car could be completely submerged in such a small pond. Those suckers are deep!
https://www.twincities.com/2013/11/28/st-louis-park-drowning-accident-spurs-questions-about-retention-ponds/

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

But the sun shined on them while they drowned, so…

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Actually there is a definition, from my old environmental engineering textbook:

A lake is any body of water deep enough to submerge a Tesla Model S

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

but in reality only a few people would be able to react accordingly to save themselves.

It should frankly happen by design. Humans can’t be expected to let the water in while submerged, that takes will and under stress it’s hard to think.

Say, have pressure sensors outside which would open some small windows, I don’t know.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I appreciate this. I’m astounded by the callous lack of empathy of some of these other comments.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Being terminally online causes a huge distortion in one’s sense of empathy and justice

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 385K

    Comments