5 points

Diablo IV is better than III.

permalink
report
reply
9 points

Is it? Honestly speaking I loved both 1 and 2, but the slot machine mechanics of 3 made me steer away towards other similar games instead.

If I do not need to grind, I’m fine.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I liked summoning in 3, but in 4 it feels like all the monsters just run straight past my summons to me. It’s like having an incompetent offensive line in American football. I just spend every fight running around avoiding monsters because they’re smarter than my skeletons.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Diablo 4 has some QoL elements that are better, but D3 with those changes would be better than D4.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

There’s on big flaw with 4, pricing. I would have loved to play but i just can’t spend that much on one game.

Ironically it’s probably the one thing you can hate a game for without playing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

It’s not worth it. The new combat mechanics are cool, but the level scaling ruins the whole thing.

Source: I was one of the chumps who paid for it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

Damning with faint praise

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

actually had a great time with D4’s story.

the service game elements detract from replayability though.

permalink
report
reply
4 points

The level scaling absolutely ruined that game. It had so much potential, too…

Whoever at Blizzard decided it’d be a good idea to not get more powerful with every level needs to be slingshotted into the sun

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*

So I totally agree, the game just getting harder every level made it rather unenjoyable grinding my character to lvl 100 last season. How else could Blizzard have done an open-world Diablo game, though?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

The same way they made World of Warcraft, I suppose. (That is, until they changed it to be the same as D4) Or the same way From Software made Elden Ring. All they really had to do was stick to the formula they established in the first 3 games, because the map being bigger doesn’t have any bearing on the RPG mechanics or anything. There’s just more walking now.

It’s a lot of work to balance all of the enemies for all of the different types of players, but that’s kind of what I expect when I pay $70 for a game with microtransactions

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Don’t you dare attack my slot machine

permalink
report
reply
7 points

It’s not a slot machine when items have no value because they can’t be traded

Diablo II gang

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Diablo 3 (pre-expansion) was built around trading though and it was fucking awful.

Farming Act 1 hoping for something you could sell to somebody else so you could buy that mythical Resist All gear in order to survive Act 2 made me quit in disgust. Drops were completely random, could be for any class and 90% of what dropped was no good for anyone.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

That’s what I LOVED about it! I know it’s a super unpopular opinion, but it felt so much more rewarding to find something halfway decent. Like it did in Diablo II.

Post-expansion it took a couple hours to fully gear a char, then every Primal Ancient Holy Mega Sickass Ancient Legendary was like “maybe I can go up another grift yawn” to me.

permalink
report
parent
reply
26 points

So the solution to consumers making informed choices is to have the consumer buy everything and test everything personally?

No.

permalink
report
reply
8 points
*

What? You don’t have to play yourself, just lisen only to those who played and not everyone, and don’t share opinion without playing.

Plain and simple, the difference is you can’t trust people not to talk out of their ass or not to distort informations without biases.

I don’t trust myself to have a good opinion if i didn’t play, and even if i did i’m still biased. No one should lisen to one individual.

Best way to know if a game is good is to look at the overall reception. Because if everyone is pointing out a qualitiy or flaw, it must hold some truth.

Although the best way to see if you will like it is to look at gameplay. (That or you know exactly what you’re looking for…)

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

True, but it’s not that cut and dry. If someone who’s played Overwatch “2” tells me it’s Overwatch 1 with monetized competitive gameplay elements and no earnable cosmetics or any of the progression systems, that’s not a statement of opinion. It’s a fact, and it’s easily verifiable. (also, this is me, someone who has played Overwatch since release, telling you that it’s true)

Judging a game for something like that without having played it is valid. So I think, especially if you’re objecting to engaging with a game on ethical grounds, there’s a lot more room for judging a game without playing it than you’d think.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

I don’t know why you would not lisen to a source that checked it directly rather than a third party.

But sure, it will be much easier to speak objectively on some facts like the one you quoted, bypassing the need for the actual source of information.

So for speaking ethics for exemple i completely agree.

For buying the game though (that was my premise), i think it has it’s limits. There is some informations that can be more subject to interpretation. Personally, those informations are often very relevant too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Huh, I never knew there was no middle ground between hating on something and liking it. TIL

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Ha. But I really do feel like that about D3 & D4 - completely irrationally, I know that, but I’ve also never bitched about it. No, wait, the memes do you guys not have phones were pretty funny …

permalink
report
reply

Memes

!memes@lemmy.ml

Create post

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

Community stats

  • 9.2K

    Monthly active users

  • 12K

    Posts

  • 275K

    Comments