18 points

What I’m getting from this is that the NHS has been shafted so much that they can’t even give these out for free or even at a heavily discounted rate. They even raised the lower age limit from 50 to 65 so there’s even less people able to get it for free.

permalink
report
reply
17 points

I’d be fine with paying for a booster, but £100 seems a bit steep for tiny bit of liquid in a tube. What does it think it is? Printer ink?

The flu jab’s normally less than £15, depending on where you get it (and £0 if you’re old or vulnerable enough).

permalink
report
reply
9 points

That’s the price for the US I think. It doesn’t give a price for the UK. Google tells me that flu jabs in the US cost around $70 without insurance. Like you said, flu jabs here are £10-15 for those not eligible for free ones. If the covid jabs follow the same pattern they shouldn’t be more than £20. At least I really hope that’s the case, £100 a shot will surely out-price 50%+ of people that pay for flu jabs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

You are right - I clearly missed the “in the US” bit of the paragraph!

[Edit] or I read the TLDR bot version, which omitted this information

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

Tbf, even the full version is slightly unclear unless you read it carefully.

Edit: I’m the same person you replied to, I just forgot to switch from mod account to normal account.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

NHS pays Pfizer $22-27 per dose (and that is claimed to be “most expensive” price) so can’t imagine it being more than £30

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

@fakeman_pretendname @merridew
None of them are £0
We buy them in bulk, and pay for most through general taxation, efficiently.

The COVID vaccines are made by actually more expensive and difficult techniques/ologies, which are available in new facilities of more limited extent.

Expect the products of those techs to become more plentiful and cheaper, and the difference may get below the order of magnitude. Not to parity.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

So those who have the cash can protect themselves and their families, those without just have to take the risk. And of course it’s those who travelling on public transport more often and work in big offices/hospitality/retail that won’t be able to afford, and those who work till they are older.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

Those without have to take the same risk regardless of whether or not it’s offered for sale at Boots.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I pay £8 to have a supermarket flu jab each year…is (almost) cheaper than buying a pack of sudafed. Why get ill and treat symptom if can prevent

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They’re talking about charging £100 for the covid booster jabs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

For sale?

permalink
report
reply
16 points

What better way to decide who lives and who dies than the invisible hand of the free market? \s

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

How’s this any different to flu at this point? I’ll admit, vulnerable people should get them for free like flu jabs, but everyone doesn’t need a free booster anymore.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Are flu shots not offered for free to the elderly in the UK? Do they have to actually buy them?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Yes, you know, like flu jabs are for sale…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I didn’t know.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-11 points
*

“a fool and his money are soon parted.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

That’s not an appropriate saying in this context at all, unless you are an antivaxxer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points

Why is it not appropriate?

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

The current criteria for qualifying for an NHS winter COVID vaccine are far stricter than the criteria for the NHS flu vaccine.

If you are asthmatic, you can easily be considered vulnerable enough to need the flu vaccine, but still not qualify for the COVID vaccine.

permalink
report
reply
1 point

@merridew You might find it helpful to see this as lining up the whole population, of the world, in ranks, ordered by how useful or urgent it is to immunise them.

You have enough doses for fewer ranks than are there. You have more doses of flu vaccine than of COVID.

In what order have you put your ranks?

Are the ranks identical for the 2 (and several other) vaccines?

You may care to imagine being in rank n+1
Why should you be swapped with someone in rank n?

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

No, I don’t see that as particularly helpful.

Global annual influenza vaccine manufacturing capacity is around 1.68 billion doses. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10309624/

Pfizer alone can churn out 4 billion COVID doses annually. https://www.pfizer.com/science/coronavirus/vaccine/manufacturing-and-distribution

I eat more than the minimum required to live despite others living in poverty, and I use more energy than the minimum despite others living in poverty, and I bet you do too. I’m not going to pretend that refusing to get privately vaccinated against COVID is going to change anything except my risk of serious adverse outcomes from exposure to COVID.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

@merridew Interesting paper. On COVID I didn’t see the 4 billion in there, but I didn’t do adding up, either.
I’ve ignored all the vaccines that are not mRNA for assorted reasons, but they must be potentially useful still.

On Influenza, I think the capacity is greatly more than that, but much of it is potential and/or used for other purposes. Given a 1919-like strain we could ramp it up rapidly.

permalink
report
parent
reply

United Kingdom

!unitedkingdom@feddit.uk

Create post

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think “reputable news source” needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

Community stats

  • 2.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 2K

    Posts

  • 19K

    Comments