A First Amendment group sued Texas Governor Greg Abbott and others on Thursday over the state’s TikTok ban on official devices, arguing the prohibition – which extends to public universities – is unconstitutional and impedes academic freedom.

24 points

If it’s a work device, why should you be allowed to install any app you want? Security+ fundamentals state that employer owned mobile devices should be managed and only approved apps deployed, it’s a huge security risk otherwise.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

Of all the First Amendment violations caused by Governor Abbott’s office, and this is the one they choose to fight? There’s nothing academic on TikTok that isn’t available somewhere not scammy. How stupid. Fight for trans kids, jesus christ.

permalink
report
reply
-2 points

Y’all should read the article. The issue is that a professor who studies digital media can’t search TikTok, and can’t have her grad students search videos on TikTok. This ends her research because TikTok is where people post videos.

permalink
report
reply
14 points

Hmmm allow spyware on government owned devices, or let some grad student do his thesis on TikTok. Decisions decisions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

For real, this is one of the very few things right-wingers are correct about. Of course they’re correct because they’re hawkish on China rather than because it’s bad to let authoritarian countries have literal spyware on the devices of your citizens, but something something broken clocks. That being said, I think a carve out for universities studying media would make sense at least, but hopefully the whole thing doesn’t get overturned.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yeah it’s very confusing to agree with them because they are right for the wrong reasons.

TikTok is a security nightmare - I work in IT so I know a little about this. But the idea that a work owned device has restrictions about what can be installed is nothing new. Now I do work in IT but also in academia, so you know how you get around this? Grant money. Go buy whatever device you want and it’s not university/state government owned.

This looks like a cherry picked problem to make a stink about something not important. Texas has much bigger issues that need dealt with.

But with that being said fuck TikTok.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Should create a process allowing them to set up a test environment as a digital equivalent of a biological weapons research lab (just not as leaky as that one in Wuhan) and play with the CCP spyware from there.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I think the lawsuit is absurd, but the University professor in question did apply for an exemption for herself and her students in the classroom, and she was denied without review because the ban is absolute.

Fwiw I don’t see why it wouldn’t be possible to simply use personal devices for such research. But the argument that the ban goes too far doesn’t seem completely unreasonable in this narrow use case.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’d like to see TikTok banned from all devices across the US (personal or otherwise) but I don’t make the rules. It’s among the worst of a bad bunch of applications and under the control of the Chinese Communist Party. To me, that sets it apart from the ones owned by US-based companies because at least those companies can get dragged into court for doing something wrong or grossly negligent. It’s not as easy to go after a Chinese company, particularly if (/when) the instruction to collect data comes from their government.

My other concerns are too tin-foil-hat to bring up here which should say something given what I wrote above. Short version is that none of them can be trusted but that goes double (at least) for anything connected to the CCP.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Oh jeez, people are still doing lab leak conspiracy theories? Maybe someday we’ll have evidence of that and the years of conspiracies will finally pay off.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s not something I’d stake my life on but if I were to place it in a range from “aliens visit Earth to butt-probe rednecks” to “OJ murdered Ron and Nicole”, it’d be much closer to the OJ end. More information is needed.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

TikTok can get absolutely fucked, there’s nothing in the first amendment in regards to protecting yourself from foreign enemies.

Also, fuck China.

permalink
report
reply

Agree

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to “Mom! He’s bugging me!” and “I’m not touching you!” Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 14K

    Monthly active users

  • 16K

    Posts

  • 466K

    Comments