Pornhub has disabled its site in Texas to object to a state law that requires the company to verify the age of users to prevent minors from accessing the site.

Texas residents who visit the site are met with a message from the company that criticizes the state’s elected officials who are requiring them to track the age of users.

The company said the newly passed law impinges on “the rights of adults to access protected speech” and fails to pass strict scrutiny by “employing the least effective and yet also most restrictive means of accomplishing Texas’s stated purpose of allegedly protecting minors.”

218 points

What kind of “small government” legislates morality?

permalink
report
reply
105 points

They want to ban it nationwide

Pornography, manifested today in the omnipresent propagation of transgender ideology and sexualization of children, for instance, is not a political Gordian knot inextricably binding up disparate claims about free speech, property rights, sexual liberation, and child welfare. It has no claim to First Amendment protection. Its purveyors are child predators and misogynistic exploiters of women. Their product is as addictive as any illicit drug and as psychologically destructive as any crime. Pornography should be outlawed. The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned. Educators and public librarians who purvey it should be classed as registered sex offenders. And telecommunications and technology firms that facilitate its spread should be shuttered

-A Promise to America", Mandate for Leadership: The Conservative Promise, p. 5, Project 2025

permalink
report
parent
reply
37 points

as psychologically destructive as any crime.

…what? Just because something is a crime doesn’t make it “psychologically destructive.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
29 points

Removing tags on mattresses has left me a shell of a man.

permalink
report
parent
reply
68 points

Remember, one of the defining traits of right-wing political movements is the redefining of words. When a Conservative says “small government” what they really mean is “a government that can enforce our morals and values, but is incapable of enforcing rights, regulations, or equality.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

Pretty sure “government” is what they call their dicks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

They are definitely “small government conservatives” then.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

A theocracy (an autocratic one if they get their way)

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

The least moral of them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
154 points
*

I sure hope all porn sites follow Porn Hub’s lead. Just block Texas from viewing porn. Then I hope all broadband and cable TV operators follow suit as well, can’t have transexual cock on VOD or PPV. Let’s see how quickly Texas falls back in line. It won’t happen, but I can dream.

permalink
report
reply
60 points

Oh porn will be accessible it’ll just be worse.

permalink
report
parent
reply
41 points

Yep, I do agree with that part of the statement. The only porn they’ll have access to will be completely unregulated and a haven for revenge porn and CP.

Pornhub themselves weren’t amazing on that front to begin with, but they made more of an effort than most to try and clean that up due to regulatory pressures.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

The kind of sites who won’t bother complying with Texas’ age verification law because they already hosted all kinds of illegal shit are just going to explode in popularity further entrenching a depraved and violent subset of sexual abusers.

Anyway, I’m glad to see this sentiment echoed on Lemmy. Everywhere else it feels like people are thoughtlessly praising Pornhub and thinking this is a “big win.”

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Yes. I don’t explicitly like that you have to be verified to post content but it’s very nice to have the default porn site to be much better protected.

permalink
report
parent
reply
25 points

I do wonder how this kind of thing will mesh with sites that arent for porn but do allow posting of it. Like reddit or for that manner any lemmy instance federated with one of the instances with nsfw subs

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

If I remember there was a content percentage threshold that would probably keep things like reddit and federated instances allowed, the strictly porn instances however might also have to ban Texas.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Texas AG will likely get to them eventually…

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

“Why are you stuck in a dishwasher, Step Bro?”

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

“I thought it was broken but the power grid is just down because it’s cold :(”

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Everything’s bigger in Texas, even the botnets.

permalink
report
parent
reply
33 points

I’m in North Carolina and the porn has been blocked since New Year’s. The hentai websites are the only ones I have access to. (E621 is also blocked).

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

It’s not a NC thing, so I have to ask:

Are you at work or some common access?

Do you have a shared access at home, like parent/roommates/apartment/school?

Some other parental type control in force?

ISPs don’t care what you look at, they only get involved with copyright stuff because someone is hassling them to do something about it. Someone has filters at the local point to keep you from getting to places. VPN could help get past, depending on how the filters work. Interestingly I’ve gotten out with a VPN before when my ISP had my direct connection in suspension.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

It’s not blocked at layer 4 or anything. The website simply geolocates you and denies application access for users geolocated to NC. VPN gets around it fine.

The bigger issue is that plenty of other sites still allow access… So it’s effectively punishing the rule followers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

How Dare They Block E621! Now I have to become an armchair warrior and get mad over something that doesn’t affect me in the slightest because I still have access! All while doing nothing about it!

In all honesty, fuck these types of people for blocking sites that try to a degree to try and stop illegal porn on their platforms.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Specifically, e621 has geoip blocking in place. Not ISPs or anyone else

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Get yourself a VPN or learn to sail the high seas!

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

TIL there are people still paying for PPV porn on cable after we invented an entire worldwide network of porn you can access for free.

permalink
report
parent
reply
115 points

I’m a woman in Texas and if this has anything positive to come out of it, I hope a lot of the men here who don’t care about women’s reproductive rights will finally wake up to the Christian Nationalism really taking hold here, realize it may impact them, and help to do something about it.

permalink
report
reply
42 points
*

I’m with you, but I can’t imagine any other outcome than an increasingly large group of sexually-frustrated men taking this out on women / men / animals around them. Particularly as other porn sites follow suit.

What’s worse, I imagine this is either by design or a very welcome byproduct. In other words, one step closer to y’all qaeda.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

The end goal is more babies. Unwanted, uneducated and poor babies. They’ll get there by any means possible.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I can. VPN subscriptions up 60%, no measurable change in society.

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points

Porn reduces the incident of rape. Combine that with the inability to access abortion. This is going to get worse. If vulnerable people have the ability to leave, they should.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Sooooo all according to plan then right?

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Yes, more naive teens with low social economic status they can coerce into fighting their wars

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Unfortunately, vulnerable people tend not to have the ability to leave.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

This all sucks, but to be realistic it’s probably not going to change anything for anybody. Pornhub is not the only porn site, there are more options than any human being could ever make use of out there, and plenty of sites will not recognize the laws of TX.

What realistically will happen is the porn consumers will go “oh no Pornhub is down, I’ll have to go to another site” and within 5 minutes they’ll be masturbating with porn from an unblocked site. For all we know, they might even visit lemmynsfw communities, which all do not give a fuck about these laws.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

You underestimate the lengths people will go, in order to watch that perfect/favorite video that is now blocked. It’s why the porn industry makes so much money in the first place

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
2 points

You keep commenting this, and yet your source doesn’t provide any evidence other than quotes…

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Something something strange bedfellows.

permalink
report
parent
reply
84 points

At least this’ll probably push more people to hate Republicans. Like, fucking with a man’s porn supply is just political suicide. At least I hope it is.

permalink
report
reply
47 points

Don’t worry they’ll find a way to blame Biden.

Anything is possible when logic, facts, and reality don’t matter.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Maybe… I would have thought treating women like chattel would do it… But apparently not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

cattle ? or is chattel a thing ? not american speaker

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Chattel is a specific type of slavery:

In chattel slavery, the slave is legally rendered the personal property (chattel) of the slave owner.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavery

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

They should have also added a bit about big government intrusion into their personal privacy rights. They have to speak the conservative language to conservatives to really get them riled up.

permalink
report
parent
reply
78 points

Just tried it. Yep, no access. Just a long message lambasting Texas politicians.

I tried all the other regular sites, no issues.

They’re gonna need an industry wide cooperation to successfully combat this.

permalink
report
reply
48 points

I tried it, got the block message, and then tried it with a Kansas City VPN just to see if it would work. It did.

I really liked the message though. Texas legislators are dumb af if they don’t think that this is going to push people to use websites without ID requirements and less stringent rules on content creation/safety.

I mean, they were dumb af before this, but they’re extra dumb now too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Ironically, I just tried accessing PH with a VPN based in Dallas (I’m not in Texas) and got the normal site.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I wonder if they do it by ISP.

I always wonder how they do these types of blocks. Sure you can get a city from an IP record, mine reports me as several counties away.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

Sometimes it’s a good thing that the boomers don’t know how the cyber works.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The thing is, there’s hundreds, thousands, possibly millions of porn sites out there. There is no way any state is going to be able to block them all. Even if, by some miracle, they did manage to block them all - it won’t matter, people will still just use a VPN anyway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I turned off my VPN and same. I talked to a buddy and found out they’re doing it in NC and Virginia too.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Same lol. Pretty interesting read - Phub advocates for age verification on the device level rather than an individual website level.

permalink
report
parent
reply

News

!news@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

Community stats

  • 15K

    Monthly active users

  • 18K

    Posts

  • 468K

    Comments