cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/13118199

(Title shamelessly stolen from this comment in the crossposted !micromobility thread.)

35 points

The problem isn’t the class of the electric bike.

Riding on the sidewalk is extremely dangerous. Drivers will often turn (without signalling even) and not notice a bicycle coming up from behind them on a sidewalk. Driver also often back out of driveways without being able to see a bike approaching on a sidewalk.

Cyclists should be taught how to ride safely on the road and use all of the proper safety equipment.

I’ve commuted by bike for years and frequently shake my head when I see the behavior of other cyclists.

permalink
report
reply
67 points

People ride on the sidewalks for a simple reason: the roads do not feel safe enough for riding for them, because there are car drivers there behaving in a manner lethal to non-car drivers (and other drivers too fwiw).

All solutions begin with taking the lethal actor out of the equation. Anything else is needless victim blaming and can be dismissed without any more discussion.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I used to cycle on the sidewalk, but my town started enforcing cycling in the bicycle gutter instead. I did that for a while, but then I got hit and run by a car. As a 16 year old. I don’t ride my bike anymore unless it’s a trail or something.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

You can be both a victim AND an abuser. Being a victim does not excuse your actions that put OTHER PEOPLE at risk.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

I don’t disagree that roads can feel unsafe. But there’s an important detail about sidewalk riding: you can be traveling against the direction of traffic. This is demonstrably dangerous at any kind of lot entry or any time cars can traverse the sidewalk path, because there should not be vehicle traffic moving in a different direction.

So I’d say both parts are true. Bikers may feel unsafe and may be unsafe on congested roads (or especially roads without dedicated bike paths), but riding on sidewalks is actually demonstrably unsafe for the biker (not to mention unsafe for anyone walking on the sidewalk).

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

This is demonstrably dangerous at any kind of lot entry or any time cars can traverse the sidewalk path, because there should not be vehicle traffic moving in a different direction.

It depends on the sidewalks. They should be on a different grade, and separated from the road by some distance. Although part of the problem is that SUVs jump kerbs more easily, and this type of “car” has become dominant in recent years.

permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

Cyclists should have safe infrastructure instead of riding with vehicle traffic. Don’t try to shift the responsibility.

I’m saying that as an experienced cyclist as well.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Not having safe infrastructure doesn’t make bikers any less dangerous to be around. My specific citation is the bay area, other places I’ve lived have not had the sheer quantity of bikers (and drivers) with a death wish/complete lack of spatial awareness.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Cyclists are more likely to die on the sidewalk than sharing the road. Given the choice, use the road 99% of the time.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Any sources to support your claim?

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I dunno, the sidewalk on the six lane stroad near me seems much safer than the fast, congested road with lane-hopping cars and low visibility.

I get it, and I use sidewalks sparingly, but it really is circumstantial (it’s legal to ride a footpath where I live). For example, slow riding a footpath is much safer than fast riding a footpath because you have more time to react to cars entering/exiting driveways. If you’re riding somewhere nearby that’s actually quite a nice experience. But if you are trying to get somewhere more than a kilometre away, slow footpath riding would obviously slow you down a lot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

I think we really should enforce backing into spaces. As you apoproach the spot/driveway you can confirm it is clear then safely back in. When you go to leave again you have better visbility than if you pulled in and have to back out.

Anyone who says they arent comfortable enough backing into a space shouldn’t be driving.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

It’s so easy to back into spaces now with rear view cameras as standard. Always surprises me that more people don’t do it

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I hear so many people say people are dumb for backing into spaces, it makes me want to back into spaces more 😈

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I don’t understand how this is not common sense. If I’m not able to back in, I should probably not go in there. I can’t think of anything more stressful than backing out of a driveway and onto incoming traffic that I might not be able to see.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

No. Just no.

What cyclists need is dedicated infrastructure. Take it away from the car infrastructure, there is so so so so so too much car infrastructure already, convert it into much cheaper cycle infrastructure instead. Add more Public transportation infrastructure while we’re at it. THAT will make it safer, not just blaming cyclists anyway

Take an example from the Netherlands.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I started riding on the road and was promptly rewarded with a nail in my tire. I’ll stick to my area’s multi use path.

Though admittedly if the speed limit and design limit are is 35mph or less I don’t mind the road since I’m on an ebike.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

To be fair, I’ve been rewarded more than once with a nail in my tire for driving my car on the road too.

But agree, it sucks and is good reason to use multiuse paths where they exist.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-2 points

I see so many inexperienced or uneducated cyclists in my city, I almost want to make some sort of “safe cycling” video tutorial. Stuff like not riding on sidewalks (especially on stroads), Idaho stops, how to navigate intersections safely, when to take the lane, how to find routes that are safer for cycling rather than just using the route you’d take in a car, etc.

I actually feel safer on my bike than as a pedestrian in my city, but people don’t know the basics of safe cycling and get frightened by all the close calls they get when/if they try cycling. They then proceed to never cycle again because it’s “dangerous”, when really most of the danger can be avoided with smart, conscious riding.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

I think that anyone who bicycles around motor vehicles is going to have a frightening moment or close call at some point. Riding on roads where one feels most comfortable will hopefully help keep them riding, and when they feel comfortable and experienced enough, move to more “active” roads.

There’s a road where I live that’s 25mph speed limit, very busy with cars, pedestrians, shops, intersections, crosswalks, and lots of people looking for on street parking. I’ve been cycling for years and that road still requires ALL of my attention and lightning reflexes to navigate safely.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

I’ve been cycling on the road for a good 25+ years at this point… and sorry but, you’re full of shit. No matter what I do to “cycle safely”, I still get close passed, cut off, left hooked, raged at for taking the lane (as is safe to do so)… The issue isn’t my cycling, its the cars and the idiots driving them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Yep, was at a 4 way stop the other day, let 2 cars go through the intersection, go myself and nearly get run over and the driver tried to tell me to wait my turn. Old fuck never even looked. I’m 6’0" on a fat tire ebike wearing a safety jacket and was standing the entire time

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

I guess I didn’t express myself properly, because I did not in any way want to suggest that safe cycling practices would necessarily protect you from the hoards of ignorant and inattentive drivers on the roads. IMO the best advice for cycling is ride as if everyone in a car is actively trying to hurt you.

That being said, I do see a lot of cyclists in my city do stuff which puts them in risky situations more often than they need to be, which is what I was trying (and apparently failed, judging from the downvotes) to get at. No amount of safe cycling practices will make up for improper infrastructure or lack of proper driver training, that much I’m sure we agree on.But I’d hope you’ll agree that one’s not putting the odds in their favour if they’re, for example, riding down the wrong side of the road on the sidewalk at night without lights. If you’ve been cycling for 25+ years, I’ve no doubt you already follow most if not all of the safe cycling practices I wish I could share with my fellow cyclists, the intent of my comment was not to victim-blame cyclists but rather expressing my wish to help educate noobie cyclists to reach the level of knowledge and comfort on the road that more experienced cyclists like us take for granted.

Of course you’ll still face road conflicts no matter what, the majority of drivers are a menace to public safety. It’s not a matter of eliminating risk, it’s about minimizing points of potential conflict in order to minimize risk.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

If you’ve been doing it this long you know that you’re the outlier. Bicyclists are terrifying to be near.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

The fact that I’ve seen so few cyclists wearing high visibility gear is astounding. That was the first thing I bought after buying my bike, was a high-vis retro-reflective vest. Probably also helps that my bike has running lights, but still.

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points

People shouldnt need to be neon colored to not be killed on their commute.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

I agree, but we don’t live in that world. Until our governments start giving a shit, we gotta do what we gotta do. If we’re going to be forced to share the road with two ton death machines, it only makes sense to ensure that they can at least see us.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-9 points

I’m not following your line of thinking.

If we banished all cars, and people where on dedicated E-Bike/Bike roads, you assume dangerous collisions at night would just disappear?

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I consider lights to be a necessity. I have a bright 1800 lumen Niterider headlight that I love and (I think) a 350 lumen Cygolite taillight. I never ride on the road without at least the taillight flashing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

My state law considers them to be a necessity as well (at night). Sadly about half the bicycle riders I see riding at night have no lights. Occasionally I see them in a local news article once they get struck by a car.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Go for ankle straps over vests. It’s far more important for the reflective materials to be moving than the amount of body coverage you have.

GCN recently covered this topic with interviews of optometry and psychology professors: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=33GpfTWdk8U

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Makes sense, thanks!

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Absolutely baffling that you’re being downvoted. Anyone using the road needs plenty of ways that other road-users can see them easily. Cars and motorcycles have lights and reflectors, bicycles need them too!

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

You’re ignoring that the cyclist is being blamed instead of any other thing. Say like the terrible infrastructure for starters.

permalink
report
parent
reply
24 points

When does an E-Bike become a motorcycle that someone is just riding down a sidewalk?

God forbid they formulate some laws/rules that would allow people to safely use something other than a car.

permalink
report
reply
7 points

Most larger cities already have this kind of law in place anyway, limiting the power of the motors on e-bikes. For instance, mine is a Class-2 with a max speed of around 14mph and motor rated at 500w. It’s actually got a 1000w motor in it so it’s up to that speed really quickly, but it struggles to go faster because the bike is 70lbs with a 300lb rider (I bought it to lose weight and commute to work).

Makes perfect sense in my eyes to limit the speeds like this. Bike lanes are usually shit anyway, with crap all over ‘em from the road. No point in having an accident because some idiot had a blowout and nobody cleaned up the tire.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

14mph? That’s like 20km/h. What’s the point unless you live somewhere really hilly?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

It’s faster than walking, I don’t have to buy gas, it’s far cheaper to maintain, and it’s getting me active again.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Insanity. It’s not like this kid going too fast was even the issue, nothing about what they’re proposing would have avoided the incident.

permalink
report
reply
10 points

He was one month shy of his 16th birthday when he died. Now he’d have to wait a month or get his learner’s permit before being allowed to get killed by a car on an e-bike.

permalink
report
reply
2 points

How can anyone be so stupid?

I do cycle quite often (on stiff roads here, man…) and this reads to me like favoritism.

permalink
report
reply

Fuck Cars

!fuckcars@lemmy.world

Create post

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let’s explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be Civil

You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speech

Don’t discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass people

Don’t follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don’t doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topic

This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No reposts

Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

  • [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
  • [article] for news articles
  • [blog] for any blog-style content
  • [video] for video resources
  • [academic] for academic studies and sources
  • [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
  • [meme] for memes
  • [image] for any non-meme images
  • [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories

Recommended communities:

Community stats

  • 5.1K

    Monthly active users

  • 906

    Posts

  • 25K

    Comments