A $500,000 sand dune collapsed in days after being erected, and residents are looking for help to protect their homes
On the border with New Hampshire and Massachusetts – about 35 miles north of Boston – is Salisbury, a coastal town and popular summer destination for tourists. But for those who live in the town year round, especially those who live on the coastline, life’s not a beach.
Last month, after a series of storms battered the area, local citizens came together to take the necessary steps to protect their homes. Volunteer organization Salisbury Beach Citizens for Change raised more than $500,000 to erect a 15,000-ton sand dune – a formidable barrier that would hopefully protect at least 15 beach houses from destruction.
Or so they thought. The sand dune was completed after one month in early March, but just three days later, the dune – and nearly half a million dollars – was wiped away.
The tragic incident made the project a laughingstock to some and angered others.
The nerve that some asshole thinks they are entitled to hundreds of thousands to millions of taxpayer money to protect their wealthy property while the average american can barely afford a run down home or rent.
They already made it clear they’re not interested in spending their own money. That nearly $600k sounds like a lot, but when you look into it, that cost was spread between numerous homes on the beach there. I was purusing the Beach Associations Facebook page trying to find details, and failed, but looking at the coastline and the number of houses on it, I’d wager it was meant to protect at least twenty homes, if not plenty more. These are multi-million dollar homes, and if it was only 20 homes involved, that’s about $30k each, which suddenly feels much more affordable to rich fucking twats.
So a group of rich twats bundled together to barely scrape together just over half a million, because all of them are too fucking cheap to pay what it would actually cost to solve this problem, and further, don’t think it’s actually a problem except to them and their homes.
What a bunch of cheap idiot fucking tools. Rich people are always so fucking cheap.
The Tom Saab mentioned in the article, unsurprisingly, owns a lot of rental properties on that beach. So it’s asking the government to protect his risky investment.
" local citizens came together to take the necessary steps to protect their homes." - the steps they took were obviously not the necessary steps, instead they were unnecessary and in fact idiotic.
The Town of Salisbury did not ‘grapple with sea rise’. An ad hoc association, Salisbury Beach Citizens for Change, basically the owners of multi-million dollar absurdly situated beach front homes, blew 500,000 dollars on one wall of a giant sand castle.
I feel bad that these homeowners are basically facing a complete loss of their properties, but I’m more than a little miffed that they expect the state to save their homes because the beach next door is a “public beach.” I’m pretty sure the public beach ends where their properties begin and the state has no duty to keep the ocean off their property.
I bet a sea wall or jetty of large boulders would help, but I imagine the residents would complain about the unsightly walls/boulders and want to have their cake and eat it too by proposing some ridiculously expensive or difficult solution funded by the taxpayers that only benefits the residents of these 15 homes. This one idea already cost $33k per home and lasted 3 days.
Massachusetts beach law is complicated due to dating back before the American revolution. Most states allow private ownership to the high water line, but Massachusetts allows private ownership all the way to the low water line. So it doesn’t really make sense for the government to maintain their private property.
Now, if they want to cede the beach to the state, I think the state would be happy to build something more permanent. Hopefully also something that would improve the ecosystem.
Personally I think the state should take the beach and tell them to fuck off somewhere that’s not going to be building houses in fragile ecosystems.
The effects of sea level rise from climate change have reached American coasts. Yet we continue to do almost nothing.
- continued reliance on fossil fuels. As of 2021, reliance on oil, coal, and natural gas at 60% worldwide [2]
- no desire to implement a diverse range of transportation options (ie, enhanced public transportation). Yet continued desire to widen highway infrastructure
- no desire to rebuild cities to be more efficient and reduce dependency on car centric transportation (no, EVs will not automagically solve the problems with car centric transportation)
- no desire to change lifestyle. The amount of meat this country consumes is fucking insane. GHGs from meat production alone account for a third of GHGs [1]
- the suburban experiment in America and the “American Dream” is a complete failure. We need to stop ripping up diverse ecosystems that help shield or mitigate effects from Mother Nature and replacing them with monoculture suburbs and highways. Case and point: Houston, TX in the aftermath of Hurricane Harvey
[1] https://www.nature.com/articles/s43016-021-00225-9
[2] https://www.iea.org/reports/key-world-energy-statistics-2021/final-consumption
Not to negate your point, but Cape Cod beaches are a stupid place to build even without those problems. The Cape is a big pile of sand, constantly being eroded and reshaped by storms. The people who built those houses right up against the beach should have known better.
Edit: I was reading too fast and got the location mixed up. Though the problem is the same.
Wealthy people are mad that the government is not spending money on protecting their luxuries from the consequences of their own actions.
Maybe they should pull their houses out of this predicament by their boot straps
