• HashiCorp is moving its products previously licensed as Open Source away from it to Business Source License (BSL) moving forward
  • Terraform is a popular Infrastructure as Code tool used for provisioning cloud resources like AWS, Azure among others
  • Terraform version 1.5.5 and earlier are still open source
  • there is a push for a community maintained open source fork if this decision is not reversed, OpenTF

Gruntwork response on the problem with BSL

2 points

Not that I’d know much about this, but can’t you easily replace terraform with some script that remotely installs NixOS?

permalink
report
reply

i dont think theyre equivalent tools since Terraform is used for things like creating cloud VMs with the selected OS image, configuring subnets and route tables among other things which i dont believe NixOS is meant for

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Terraform is great automation, but it really shines over scripts in a few ways:

  • intrinsic documentation for your infrastructure
  • much less brittle to differences in the initial state
  • changing your setup later doesn’t require any new script logic, just a simple config change
  • much better support for collaborative editing
permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

We were considering Vault, I guess we’ll look into alternatives now, are there any decent Free Software ones in the first place?

permalink
report
reply
2 points

I’ve been using Infisical recently and I like it a lot.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I’m not an infra dev, but a previous project used SOPS and it seemed alright

permalink
report
parent
reply

ive not done secrets management before but i came across this list on hackernews, a few non-cloud ones use open source license https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37133054#37151218

but another user there have mentioned that while most of them integrate with Kubernetes and AWS, short lived DB credentials are not in any of those listed

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Fuck’em. 'Nuff said.

permalink
report
reply
12 points

For the people who continue to work on the open source fork of terraform, can HashiCorp pull their commits into their closed source BSL fork?

I would assume not, but I am curious if there’s some weird workaround of their previous license that they still own contributions

permalink
report
reply
4 points

I’m not as familiar with MPLv2 but I don’t think they can with contributions to the fork. Since those contributions won’t be part of the original “we own all your work” agreement they couldn’t simply close source those contributions.

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

From the BSL FAQ:

Q: I have written a code patch to a BSL project and would like the BSL vendor to maintain the code as part of the BSL project. How do I contribute it?

A: License your code using the “new BSD” license or dedicate it to the public domain. Code contributions under “new BSD” is compatible with BSL. See BSD on Wikipedia.

That would seem to rule out the MPLv2.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

That is for continuing contributions to the commercial project, the fork should be using the old license not the BSL.

If HashiCorp is unwilling to switch Terraform back to an open source license, we propose to fork the legacy MPL-licensed Terraform

The question was if HashiCorp could take contributions to the fork and put them into their commercial product.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

When Canonical originally had such a CLA to contribute to Ubuntu it was pretty controversial (I don’t think it was common at all at the time), this situation with HashiCorp perfectly demonstrates why.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

ouch… Well, with the fork they wont have to do that anymore… so thats good.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

The integrations with other services are implemented in plugins which are separate programs, that are installed separately, and communicate with the core over RPC. I would imagine these plugins can continue to be licensed however their owners choose. I think this license change just applies to core.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I was hit aggressively by HC sales team last year, we are using TF and Vault, and were looking to add consul, now it is pretty vauge how it will all pan put

permalink
report
reply

Technology

!technology@beehaw.org

Create post

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community’s icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

Community stats

  • 2.8K

    Monthly active users

  • 2.9K

    Posts

  • 54K

    Comments