Kyle Rittenhouse abruptly departed the stage during an appearance at the University of Memphis on Wednesday, after he was confronted about comments made by Turning Point USA founder and president Charlie Kirk.

Rittenhouse was invited by the college’s Turning Point USA chapter to speak at the campus. However, the event was met with backlash from a number of students who objected to Rittenhouse’s presence.

The 21-year-old gained notoriety in August 2020 when, at the age of 17, he shot and killed two men—Joseph Rosenbaum, 36, and Anthony Huber, 26, as well as injuring 26-year-old Gaige Grosskreutz—at a protest in Kenosha, Wisconsin.

He said the three shootings, carried out with a semi-automatic AR-15-style firearm, were in self-defense. The Black Lives Matter (BLM) protest where the shootings took place was held after Jacob Blake, a Black man, was left paralyzed from the waist down after he was shot by a white police officer.

234 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
139 points
*

Yea, I bet he wished he could have illegally crossed state lines with a firearm he wasn’t legally allowed to have again to protect himself from these organized students

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

This joke gets extra dark when you realize he has another speaking engagement next month at Kent State University.

permalink
report
parent
reply
60 points

Careful, he may feel the urge to self-defend again from hecklers.

permalink
report
reply
17 points

He crossed state lines to hunt people, and now has a taste for human blood.

Your warning is legitimate.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

He has as much charisma as a Twilight vampire.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Like George Zimmerman, but less enchanting.

permalink
report
parent
reply
21 points

Can’t wait for him to wrong-turn himself into a random driveway and get a taste of his own medicine from one of his own.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-63 points

I honestly feel bad for this kid. His parents are clearly unhinged, which caused him to end up thinking he needed to defend businesses in another state from rioters, and the right using him as a tool of propaganda along with the expectations that come with that cannot be healthy for the mind.

permalink
report
reply
40 points

Fuck off with that bullshit. He is a murderer who should be rotting in jail. Instead he is gifting off those murders and deserves every misfortune that comes his way.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-16 points

Overly simplistic, but ok. I don’t think he should be walking about freely either. Just saying, we’re all products of our genetics, environment, and upbringing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

I guess you feel bad for all murderers then.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
52 points

He’s clearly making a decent living from this, all because he murdered someone and got away with it. I feel much worse about the family of the dead, or people working minimum wage trying to get by. I feel just about zero sympathy for this kid. Sure, maybe he was raised in a bad position, but it was his choice to do what he did. Do you see many other people raised in bad situations doing what he did? That’s on him, not his parents.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

His parents encouraged this bullshit. He was a young person who deserved better guidance. I’m not suggesting that he should be free, just expressing my thoughts on what a tragedy it is.

permalink
report
parent
reply
30 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
28 points

I get you on this. A lot of people really struggle to maintain empathy with people they may otherwise find despicable, but to me, increasing empathy in the world among and for literally everyone is a paramount goal. Take this example: A huge percentage of men who sexually assault children were sexually assaulted themselves as children. It’s easy to dehumanize someone in this situation, but the reality is they have been both a victimizer and a victim in their lives. People are way more complex than our present instant judgment-based society allows for.

All that said, all Kyle Rittenhouse has to do is shut his ugly goddamn mouth if he wants to stop getting lambasted by the public.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

This.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

I get what you’re saying. He was a kid and probably had a fucked up childhood that led to everything. It’s rare that people like that develop in a vacuum. But that’s an explanation of how he got here, not an excuse.

Now he’s an adult. There are definitely people on the right using him, but he made the decision to let them. He could have easily slunk into the shadows and gone on with his life. Instead, he felt the court acquittal wasn’t enough and had to continue to prove he was right for his actions on the public stage. That’s his choice and his alone.

He deserves the ridicule.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

I’m sure a significant number of people in his life told him how to do the right thing and he choose racially based violence and murdered people.

There is no reason to feel sorry for him. At best we understand how he got to be such a waste of oxygen and try to counter that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
106 points
*
Removed by mod
permalink
report
reply
21 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

I feel like the right will abandon him completely someday soon. He keeps messing up, and has zero charisma to really be a figurehead or an icon.

He will then attempt to find himself and show so much remorse in an attempt to grift the left side of politics. Something something “what happened was awful, and a 17 year old should have never been allowed to have a weapon” - and it will all be said without ever taking responsibility or admitted to wrongdoing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
247 points
*

“Charlie Kirk has said a lot of racist things,” said a student addressing Rittenhouse from the audience.

“What racist things has Charlie Kirk said?” Rittenhouse challenged. “We’re gonna have a little bit of a dialogue of what racist things that Charlie Kirk said.”

The student responded of Kirk: “He says that we shouldn’t celebrate Juneteenth, we shouldn’t celebrate Martin Luther King day—we should be working those days—he called Ketanji Brown Jackson an affirmative action hire, he said all this nonsense about George Floyd, and he said he’d be scared if a Black pilot was on a plane. Does that not seem racist?”

“I don’t know anything about that,” Rittenhouse said from the stage, prompting jeers among the audience.

“Does that seem racist is a yes or no question, Kyle,” yelled one attendee.

“Well, after all the things I just told you, would you consider that hate speech,” the student asked Rittenhouse, who had a dog with him onstage.

“I’m not gonna comment on that,” Rittenhouse said, sparking more noise from the crowd.

Seconds later, Rittenhouse abruptly exited the stage to cheers from the crowd. The attendees were then promptly ordered to depart the venue.

permalink
report
reply
154 points

They fly him around the country, but the media outfit he’s working for didn’t bother to invest in media training for their homicidal poster boy?

So much for standing your ground.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

Or seat fillers.

permalink
report
parent
reply
77 points

Fuck yeah, make that piece of shit feel bad. Pure uncut Colombian schadenfreude.

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

What is Colombian schadenfreude?

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Probably still schadenfreude, since we use the German word in English.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

“Uncut Colombian” is a drug reference for cocaine. He’s just trying to say it’s the “best of the best”.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*

And schadenfreude is the leftover discharge from anal sex. Named after former US senator and moral crusader Rick Schadenfreude.

permalink
report
parent
reply
50 points

“I don’t know anything about that,”

This seems to be the canned response to all “uncomfortable” topics.

It seems that right-wing “debates” are not about arguing a point or another, but bringing up the “right” talking points, and backing out the wrong ones.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-56 points
*

Please don’t normalizing hating on people for not knowing something. If you think he actually knows kirk said these things, then please provide the proof. But if you are simply attacking him for admitting he doesn’t know something, then you’re part of the problem.

permalink
report
parent
reply
46 points

There’s a very simple way to answer this sort of question that was posed — by condemning the blatant racism of the statements themselves while acknowledging he didn’t know if Kirk had said them — and he decided not to do that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

Asking whether those things are hate speech is a yes/no question. Pretending to not know Kirk is a racist sack of shit was obvious deflection. Good on the students for calling out this bs.

permalink
report
parent
reply
32 points

You’re telling me that the guy who showed up to counter protest with a gun, who provoked protestors while holding a gun, is actually a coward who’s too afraid to comment on the racist remarks of his shitty friend.

Who’da’thunk’it

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

They haven’t yet taught him how to deflect the truth. Teach him that what he believes is bullshit, but profitable. Teach him how to understand and ignore the truth. Teach him how to just be louder than opposition. Have him memorize talking points and teach him to always retreat to them (especially when not appropriate). Give him 15 years of practice doing that, then he’ll be great at owning college libs, preferably on camera.

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points

“We’re gonna have a little bit of a dialogue of what racist things that Charlie Kirk said.”

“I don’t know anything about that,”

Not much of a dialogue lol

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Someone taught him how to have the aesthetics of a rational argument, but forgot the part about the substance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Benny bitch-boy’s made a whole career out of doing that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-15 points

I mean that seems fair that he wouldn’t comment on something he doesn’t know about

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

I’m sure the people he killed would disagree

permalink
report
parent
reply
-5 points

What?

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

“I haven’t heard those quotes before. Presented without context, they sound pretty bad but I will reserve judgement until I’ve had a chance to do more research.”

That wasn’t that hard of a question to duck.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-6 points

That’s easy to say in retrospect but a lot of people can’t think of something to say when asked something unexpected on the spot. Even if they know the answer.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

You know at work when I can’t give a firm answer to a question I will just say so and promise to find out. Turns out when you are not a murderer people cut you slack

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

lol.

What a bitch.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@lemmy.world

Create post

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That’s all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

Community stats

  • 13K

    Monthly active users

  • 13K

    Posts

  • 388K

    Comments